Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:02 am

Think he got them spot on. Although surely Cala is not active until after the ball hit Begovic?

We created some good chances yesterday, Mutch, caulker twice, Whitts free kick. Decent point in the end. If Chelsea make the champions league final they will rest players against us. Beat Newcastle or Sunderland and draw the other 2 and we should be fine.

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:54 pm

KBK-13 wrote:Think he got them spot on. Although surely Cala is not active until after the ball hit Begovic?

We created some good chances yesterday, Mutch, caulker twice, Whitts free kick. Decent point in the end. If Chelsea make the champions league final they will rest players against us. Beat Newcastle or Sunderland and draw the other 2 and we should be fine.

im glad both were given or not given as i thought they were both soft....very unfair if 1 was and 1 wasnt ....i thought we done well and enjoyed the game... :ayatollah:

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:29 pm

At the time I was fumming about Odemwingie pen but Kim definitely catches him, as does N'zonzi with Campbell. Thought we lost control of the game when Dhaeli went off, should have been Mutch

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:37 pm

KBK-13 wrote:At the time I was fumming about Odemwingie pen but Kim definitely catches him, as does N'zonzi with Campbell. Thought we lost control of the game when Dhaeli went off, should have been Mutch

id rather mutch making his direct runs at defence.. :ayatollah:

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:11 pm

1. Kim doesn't do enough for him to fall over.
2. he's facing away from the goal and the ball is going away from the goal
3. its not even in the box

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:17 pm

aderynglas2 wrote:1. Kim doesn't do enough for him to fall over.
2. he's facing away from the goal and the ball is going away from the goal
3. its not even in the box



What has going away from goal got to do with it? It's still a foul

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:39 pm

KBK-13 wrote:
aderynglas2 wrote:1. Kim doesn't do enough for him to fall over.
2. he's facing away from the goal and the ball is going away from the goal
3. its not even in the box



What has going away from goal got to do with it? It's still a foul


Never in a million years was that a pen...he fell down like a plank from a standing position...never enough contact to put him down...good job i don't fall down like that every time someone nudges me on the bus or pavement.

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:54 pm

KBK-13 wrote:
aderynglas2 wrote:1. Kim doesn't do enough for him to fall over.
2. he's facing away from the goal and the ball is going away from the goal
3. its not even in the box



What has going away from goal got to do with it? It's still a foul


Well if you add that fact that it wasn't in any way a goal scoring opportunity with the fact it may well have been outside the box and WASN'T A FOUL, then its clear that it should never have been a penalty.

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:55 pm

KBK-13 wrote:
aderynglas2 wrote:1. Kim doesn't do enough for him to fall over.
2. he's facing away from the goal and the ball is going away from the goal
3. its not even in the box



What has going away from goal got to do with it? It's still a foul


Well if you add that fact that it wasn't in any way a goal scoring opportunity with the fact it may well have been outside the box and WASN'T A FOUL, then its clear that it should never have been a penalty.

Re: Both were pens

Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:43 pm

The one for Stoke, I wouldn't even say it's one that swing either way, not a penalty for me.

Ours was clear as day, Campbell knew what he was doing.

Re: Both were pens

Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:48 am

Like the Sunderland penalty later that day Odemwingie's foot landed on Kim's, no penalty