Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:35 pm

When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:42 pm

Agreed. We need 6 in midfield.

Great idea mate! :ayatollah:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:46 pm

TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:52 pm

Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:52 pm

We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:53 pm

Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:54 pm

TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on


NO :thumbup:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:54 pm

TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on

Armchair manager :roll:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:56 pm

Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on


NO :thumbup:

Not sure what point you are trying to prove you numpty :lol:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:56 pm

TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:59 pm

TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on


NO :thumbup:

Not sure what point you are trying to prove you numpty :lol:


Big ears :laughing5:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:00 pm

llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:00 pm

Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively

Absolutely shocking display so far


same old TRose always moaning :ole:


They all think they are managers Jinks :roll:


I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager? :lol:

Jog on


NO :thumbup:

Not sure what point you are trying to prove you numpty :lol:


Big ears :laughing5:


Exactly :thumbup:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:01 pm

My formation:

Marshall

Fabio
Caulker
Medel

Whitts
Mutch

Zaha
Daehli
Campbell
Berget
Bellamy

3-2-5

:ayatollah:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:01 pm

TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield


The large midfield is to stifle them and so far its working,

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:06 pm

TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:08 pm

TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:


At this time we are not losing :thumbup:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:09 pm

Jinks wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:


At this time we are not losing :thumbup:


Fantastic

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:10 pm

llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


Spot on. This guy rose is clueless.

4 2 f*cking 4 indeed :roll:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:13 pm

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


Spot on. This guy rose is clueless.

4 2 f*cking 4 indeed :roll:



Sounds like he's been playing too much Football Manager so all of a sudden he thinks he's Mourinho.

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:18 pm

llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:23 pm

I am turning my back on this thread due to the ignorance spouted by the OP.

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:25 pm

TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:


Are you trying to deny that if wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it isn't 4-3-3? :lol: Okay then, you know best.

But if we tried to attack Southampton and got tonked 5-0 then no doubt you and others would have tore into Ole for being naive. You can get 3 points without possession as well, you know?

Hard to pass the ball well when Southampton have their defensive line on the half way line and are all over us. If you've ever played a game of football you'd know that you need space to pass the ball effectively.

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:26 pm

Aramore wrote:I am turning my back on this thread due to the ignorance spouted by the OP.



Crack on - you haven't contributed anything :lol:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:26 pm

TRose69 wrote:
Aramore wrote:I am turning my back on this thread due to the ignorance spouted by the OP.



Crack on - you haven't contributed anything :lol:


Bye Mr Kettle

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:28 pm

TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:


You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football :lol: :lol:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:32 pm

Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:


You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football :lol: :lol:


You sound like someone who is to scared to voice a valid opinion on football and is content to slate other peoples opinions without offering anything constructive :thumbup:

And f**k me an unbelievable long shot by cala!

Let's hope we can hold on eh :thumbright:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:46 pm

TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:


You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football :lol: :lol:


You sound like someone who is to scared to voice a valid opinion on football and is content to slate other peoples opinions without offering anything constructive :thumbup:

And f**k me an unbelievable long shot by cala!

Let's hope we can hold on eh :thumbright:


5 man midfield seems to be working at the moment :thumbup: Marshall helps though :ayatollah:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:50 pm

Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5

And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit :lol:

Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning :thumbup:



You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?


34% possession first half has proved my point for me

No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front :thumbup:

I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield



Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.

And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.

I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.


If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3

I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously :thumbup:

We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic

They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward

We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing

And I expect us to be able to pass the ball :thumbup:


You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football :lol: :lol:


You sound like someone who is to scared to voice a valid opinion on football and is content to slate other peoples opinions without offering anything constructive :thumbup:

And f**k me an unbelievable long shot by cala!

Let's hope we can hold on eh :thumbright:


5 man midfield seems to be working at the moment :thumbup: Marshall helps though :ayatollah:


Because they have started stringing passes together

And i will agree with you on that :ayatollah:

Re: What is the point in having 5 in midfield

Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:02 pm

Guess its back to the drawing board for you mr cm manager :ayatollah: :ole: