FAO Annis

Other thread got a bit messy so in-case you missed it I've copied and pasted below;

I honestly believe if Tans advisors had some balls and those who work within our club, Tan would actually listen.

I chatted to Tan for 3hrs and he respected me and listened, but was later told I was only 10% of the fans who believed in BLUE.

The problem for them is now if we went back BLUE and Tan became say liked or even a hero, Tan would then believe he was then originally ill advised, even though he wasnt, they just arse licked him, I believe Tan would then sack them all.

Just my strong opinion


As to not liking Tan, its because he takes the mick out of our identity and has made us a laughing circus.

Tan has not also stuck to his promise nearly 2 years ago to change the debt which is 90% his own making in to equity.
When he does that a lot of fans will at least feel relieved including myself and dare I say you Nat


As to Ole, I feel for him and I just believe he is out of his depth at this current moment.

Good luck to him next season, we should all give him a chance

Annis, that seems at complete odds with the other stuff you've been putting out about Tan the last few years. From your stance now, it is as if you're almost saying he is an innocent victim. he made a bold move to change our colour (for whatever reason, could say a bold business decision) but has been given further bad advice which has not allowed him to be informed enough to change it back. Whereas before you've always used quite abrasive language when describing him!

I will breath a lot easier too once the debt to equity has occurred. but as in my post the other night, you can't say he hasn't stuck to his promise (or as previous, called him a liar). He will only break his promise if he doesn't complete it by the time he comes to leave the club. That's my view; "judge not, less ye be judged".

Because Natman, due to the stripping of our identity it has hurt me and it has never ever felt the same watching City, so I have taken it out on the person at the top which is Tan, who at the end of the day, has to take the final blame.

so have you changed your opinion on him now? As, like I said, he could have been doing it for the right reasons. It may be proving to be a mistake but unless his people who live the club day to day feed that to him he's not necessarily going to know or realise that.

Other thread got a bit messy so in-case you missed it I've copied and pasted below;

I honestly believe if Tans advisors had some balls and those who work within our club, Tan would actually listen.

I chatted to Tan for 3hrs and he respected me and listened, but was later told I was only 10% of the fans who believed in BLUE.

The problem for them is now if we went back BLUE and Tan became say liked or even a hero, Tan would then believe he was then originally ill advised, even though he wasnt, they just arse licked him, I believe Tan would then sack them all.

Just my strong opinion


As to not liking Tan, its because he takes the mick out of our identity and has made us a laughing circus.

Tan has not also stuck to his promise nearly 2 years ago to change the debt which is 90% his own making in to equity.
When he does that a lot of fans will at least feel relieved including myself and dare I say you Nat


As to Ole, I feel for him and I just believe he is out of his depth at this current moment.

Good luck to him next season, we should all give him a chance

Annis, that seems at complete odds with the other stuff you've been putting out about Tan the last few years. From your stance now, it is as if you're almost saying he is an innocent victim. he made a bold move to change our colour (for whatever reason, could say a bold business decision) but has been given further bad advice which has not allowed him to be informed enough to change it back. Whereas before you've always used quite abrasive language when describing him!

I will breath a lot easier too once the debt to equity has occurred. but as in my post the other night, you can't say he hasn't stuck to his promise (or as previous, called him a liar). He will only break his promise if he doesn't complete it by the time he comes to leave the club. That's my view; "judge not, less ye be judged".

Because Natman, due to the stripping of our identity it has hurt me and it has never ever felt the same watching City, so I have taken it out on the person at the top which is Tan, who at the end of the day, has to take the final blame.

so have you changed your opinion on him now? As, like I said, he could have been doing it for the right reasons. It may be proving to be a mistake but unless his people who live the club day to day feed that to him he's not necessarily going to know or realise that.

Are we seriously to believe Tan hasnt got more than a 10% clue as to wtf the majority of fans now feel towards HIS rebrand ?!

That's one helluva spliff lads !

Other thread got a bit messy so in-case you missed it I've copied and pasted below;

I honestly believe if Tans advisors had some balls and those who work within our club, Tan would actually listen.

I chatted to Tan for 3hrs and he respected me and listened, but was later told I was only 10% of the fans who believed in BLUE.

The problem for them is now if we went back BLUE and Tan became say liked or even a hero, Tan would then believe he was then originally ill advised, even though he wasnt, they just arse licked him, I believe Tan would then sack them all.

Just my strong opinion


As to not liking Tan, its because he takes the mick out of our identity and has made us a laughing circus.

Tan has not also stuck to his promise nearly 2 years ago to change the debt which is 90% his own making in to equity.
When he does that a lot of fans will at least feel relieved including myself and dare I say you Nat


As to Ole, I feel for him and I just believe he is out of his depth at this current moment.

Good luck to him next season, we should all give him a chance

Annis, that seems at complete odds with the other stuff you've been putting out about Tan the last few years. From your stance now, it is as if you're almost saying he is an innocent victim. he made a bold move to change our colour (for whatever reason, could say a bold business decision) but has been given further bad advice which has not allowed him to be informed enough to change it back. Whereas before you've always used quite abrasive language when describing him!

I will breath a lot easier too once the debt to equity has occurred. but as in my post the other night, you can't say he hasn't stuck to his promise (or as previous, called him a liar). He will only break his promise if he doesn't complete it by the time he comes to leave the club. That's my view; "judge not, less ye be judged".

Because Natman, due to the stripping of our identity it has hurt me and it has never ever felt the same watching City, so I have taken it out on the person at the top which is Tan, who at the end of the day, has to take the final blame.

so have you changed your opinion on him now? As, like I said, he could have been doing it for the right reasons. It may be proving to be a mistake but unless his people who live the club day to day feed that to him he's not necessarily going to know or realise that.

I have still got my opinion of him, he is use to getting what he wants, so has no respect. But Tan gives more respect to people who spk out, Ive seen that for myself in person

Other thread got a bit messy so in-case you missed it I've copied and pasted below;

I honestly believe if Tans advisors had some balls and those who work within our club, Tan would actually listen.

I chatted to Tan for 3hrs and he respected me and listened, but was later told I was only 10% of the fans who believed in BLUE.

The problem for them is now if we went back BLUE and Tan became say liked or even a hero, Tan would then believe he was then originally ill advised, even though he wasnt, they just arse licked him, I believe Tan would then sack them all.

Just my strong opinion


As to not liking Tan, its because he takes the mick out of our identity and has made us a laughing circus.

Tan has not also stuck to his promise nearly 2 years ago to change the debt which is 90% his own making in to equity.
When he does that a lot of fans will at least feel relieved including myself and dare I say you Nat


As to Ole, I feel for him and I just believe he is out of his depth at this current moment.

Good luck to him next season, we should all give him a chance

Annis, that seems at complete odds with the other stuff you've been putting out about Tan the last few years. From your stance now, it is as if you're almost saying he is an innocent victim. he made a bold move to change our colour (for whatever reason, could say a bold business decision) but has been given further bad advice which has not allowed him to be informed enough to change it back. Whereas before you've always used quite abrasive language when describing him!

I will breath a lot easier too once the debt to equity has occurred. but as in my post the other night, you can't say he hasn't stuck to his promise (or as previous, called him a liar). He will only break his promise if he doesn't complete it by the time he comes to leave the club. That's my view; "judge not, less ye be judged".

Because Natman, due to the stripping of our identity it has hurt me and it has never ever felt the same watching City, so I have taken it out on the person at the top which is Tan, who at the end of the day, has to take the final blame.

so have you changed your opinion on him now? As, like I said, he could have been doing it for the right reasons. It may be proving to be a mistake but unless his people who live the club day to day feed that to him he's not necessarily going to know or realise that.

Are we seriously to believe Tan hasnt got more than a 10% clue as to wtf the majority of fans now feel towards HIS rebrand ?!

That's one helluva spliff lads !

Just under 2yrs ago Tan was told that and was led to believe it, but of course thankfully now our fans as each game has gone by have increased the BLUE

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

great idea..why not egg him.........do you realise,the longer we remain red,the less chance there is we will revert to blue,every new /young fan we get will feel for the red as we do for the blue,and the only person that can change this is Tan...........the sea of blue is great........red makes no business sense,and he is good at business decisions..so i know lets turn it into a pissing contest......i wonder sometimes if people really want the blue or just want to rebel.

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

great idea..why not egg him.........do you realise,the longer we remain red,the less chance there is we will revert to blue,every new /young fan we get will feel for the red as we do for the blue,and the only person that can change this is Tan...........the sea of blue is great........red makes no business sense,and he is good at business decisions..so i know lets turn it into a pissing contest......i wonder sometimes if people really want the blue or just want to rebel.

Or indeed detest Tan so badly for rebranding the club & dividing the fan base they just want him out !?!

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

What's changed?
Someone's had a word with annis and asked or told him to ease up with his campaign against Vincent Tan.

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

What's changed?
Someone's had a word with annis and asked or told him to ease up with his campaign against Vincent Tan.

Why's that? ????? Hmmmmm

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

It could also be argued you are one sad, boring tw*t as well Natman.

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

It could also be argued you are one sad, boring tw*t as well Natman.

But that's not what we're discussing here!

He has made mistakes but he is an interesting character and certainly not the evil dictator some would have him as. There is some humanity in his character (e.g. the £1m charity donations every year we stay up).

I honestly believe if blue is argued for in a less aggressive fashion towards Tan then we might get both the colour back and Tan to stay onboard.

Aggressive. not you as well.

Aggressive. not you as well.

Do you allways close you eyes toward your enviorment? Do you feel safe walking home at night, knowing you grassed up so many people, yet no one made any threats? Do you know this is a passive agressive message just to prove a trolling point? But it is.

So its gone from evil dictator and someone who only likes yes men to wrongly advised and not to bad after all
Whats in it for you a foot in the door or a 99 ice cream

Really feel we need to up the ante here Annis, the despot needs targetting week in , week out, keep the high profile blue at games & add the anti-Tan element !

You've exemplified my point perfectly! Annis has constantly referred to him as a dictator and you've just called him a despot. Yet it could be argued that Annis' current description of Tan is completely contradictory to the image he's previously tried to portray of him. So whats changed?

What's changed?
Someone's had a word with annis and asked or told him to ease up with his campaign against Vincent Tan.

If I was Vincent Tan i would off course change Cardiff City back to Blue!

But at the same time, I would bribe Annis to mellow down with the re-brand with a family season ticket plus two mods of his choice, and a lucky prize draw winner for a AAMB member.

Wonder if Carl or Annis know who the mole is

Wonder if Carl or Annis know who the mole is

We do Jinks and yes he is a junior coach and 2 others involved who City are still trying to prove they were involved all will be out soon, once proven, so 3 in total, end off.

Very Sad for our club.

Wonder if Carl or Annis know who the mole is

We do Jinks and yes he is a junior coach and 2 others involved who City are still trying to prove they were involved all will be out soon, once proven, so 3 in total, end off.

Very Sad for our club.

biting the hands that feeds them hope the lowlife get sacked and their photos in the papers ( if they are guilty )

Wonder if Carl or Annis know who the mole is

We do Jinks and yes he is a junior coach and 2 others involved who City are still trying to prove they were involved all will be out soon, once proven, so 3 in total, end off.

Very Sad for our club.

biting the hands that feeds them hope the lowlife get sacked and their photos in the papers ( if they are guilty )

Jinks We both 100% agree on that without a doubt

Wonder if Carl or Annis know who the mole is

We do Jinks and yes he is a junior coach and 2 others involved who City are still trying to prove they were involved all will be out soon, once proven, so 3 in total, end off.

Very Sad for our club.

biting the hands that feeds them hope the lowlife get sacked and their photos in the papers ( if they are guilty )

Jinks We both 100% agree on that without a doubt

Why is moody's name popping up any truth he was involved to?