S4C investiages Tan

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138939
I'm sure there was a story about this on here yesterday but in case anyone missed it here it is again.

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138939

I'm sure there was a story about this on here yesterday but in case anyone missed it here it is again.

Yes mate. But because I pointed out the following;

Why is this an announcement?

Because it suggest there could be something negative about Tan and the club and this board has an agenda to undermine Tan at any cost (even the club's future existence) and will do what they can (regardless of any truth in it) in order to achieve that.

There was a post last week practically guaranteeing that Tan would spit his dummy out after the march and that he would release some potentially damaging news in order to destabilize the club prior to the WBA game. But guess what, nothing happened! Yet no-one on here will apologise for putting that out there (and I strongly believe they knew wholeheartedly what they were doing) and now the fans will add more junk on to their false opinions of Tan (dictator, despot etc) and harbour more ill feeling because they thought something will/had happened which never actually did!

It was quickly taken off the announcement and sticky section and rapidly made its way down the threads.

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138939

I'm sure there was a story about this on here yesterday but in case anyone missed it here it is again.

Yes mate. But because I pointed out the following;

Why is this an announcement?

Because it suggest there could be something negative about Tan and the club and this board has an agenda to undermine Tan at any cost (even the club's future existence) and will do what they can (regardless of any truth in it) in order to achieve that.

There was a post last week practically guaranteeing that Tan would spit his dummy out after the march and that he would release some potentially damaging news in order to destabilize the club prior to the WBA game. But guess what, nothing happened! Yet no-one on here will apologise for putting that out there (and I strongly believe they knew wholeheartedly what they were doing) and now the fans will add more junk on to their false opinions of Tan (dictator, despot etc) and harbour more ill feeling because they thought something will/had happened which never actually did!

It was quickly taken off the announcement and sticky section and rapidly made its way down the threads.

If I recall right was this not an article where the author claimed Tan would react in 10/14 days?

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138939
I'm sure there was a story about this on here yesterday but in case anyone missed it here it is again.

Yes mate. But because I pointed out the following;

Why is this an announcement?

Because it suggest there could be something negative about Tan and the club and this board has an agenda to undermine Tan at any cost (even the club's future existence) and will do what they can (regardless of any truth in it) in order to achieve that.

There was a post last week practically guaranteeing that Tan would spit his dummy out after the march and that he would release some potentially damaging news in order to destabilize the club prior to the WBA game. But guess what, nothing happened! Yet no-one on here will apologise for putting that out there (and I strongly believe they knew wholeheartedly what they were doing) and now the fans will add more junk on to their false opinions of Tan (dictator, despot etc) and harbour more ill feeling because they thought something will/had happened which never actually did!

It was quickly taken off the announcement and sticky section and rapidly made its way down the threads.

If I recall right was this not an article where the author claimed Tan would react in 10/14 days?[/quote]

Nope. That one was about a week before the West Brom game and it was said along the lines of something happening before that match.

The one this guy is on about is the one about the S4C investigation which was made an announcement either yesterday or the day before. Someone else questioned why this had happened, i posted the above and it quickly came off and became a normal thread

Because it suggest there could be something negative about Tan and the club and this board has an agenda to undermine Tan at any cost (even the club's future existence) and will do what they can (regardless of any truth in it) in order to achieve that.

There was a post last week practically guaranteeing that Tan would spit his dummy out after the march and that he would release some potentially damaging news in order to destabilize the club prior to the WBA game. But guess what, nothing happened! Yet no-one on here will apologise for putting that out there (and I strongly believe they knew wholeheartedly what they were doing) and now the fans will add more junk on to their false opinions of Tan (dictator, despot etc) and harbour more ill feeling because they thought something will/had happened which never actually did!

Why should anyone apologise for the content of someone else's article? You accused Carl of writing it first and demanded apologies off him too.

Because it suggest there could be something negative about Tan and the club and this board has an agenda to undermine Tan at any cost (even the club's future existence) and will do what they can (regardless of any truth in it) in order to achieve that.

There was a post last week practically guaranteeing that Tan would spit his dummy out after the march and that he would release some potentially damaging news in order to destabilize the club prior to the WBA game. But guess what, nothing happened! Yet no-one on here will apologise for putting that out there (and I strongly believe they knew wholeheartedly what they were doing) and now the fans will add more junk on to their false opinions of Tan (dictator, despot etc) and harbour more ill feeling because they thought something will/had happened which never actually did!

Why should anyone apologise for the content of someone else's article? You accused Carl of writing it first and demanded apologies off him too.

Yes, selective reading is definitely a trait on this board!

Failed to answer my question I see...

Why should this board apologise for the content of someone else's article? If you're that upset that your beloved Tan was given a nasty ride in an article, why not chase the actual author?

Failed to answer my question I see...

Why should this board apologise for the content of someone else's article? If you're that upset that your beloved Tan was given a nasty ride in an article, why not chase the actual author?

Nope, i answered it in the other thread where you said exactly the same thing, again, like you like to do!

SO can't be bothered to answer it yet again, because answers are never good enough for you as you like to always drag up the same points over and over and over and over and over again.

You're wrong, you're making things up. You know it, I know it. Anybody who has read the others threads knows it.

Still no answer then.

Still no answer then.

Barry

Still no answer then.

Barry

Still no answer... Not even in the original thread, like you claimed.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138447&p=1449184#p1449184