Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:58 am
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:58 am
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:11 am
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:30 am
Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:34 am
Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:20 pm
Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:33 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
No creativity
Weve scored 10 in the last 4 games and are creating plenty, its stopping them at the other end is the problem but give me that over sticking 11 men in your own half any day.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:38 pm
Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
No creativity
Weve scored 10 in the last 4 games and are creating plenty, its stopping them at the other end is the problem but give me that over sticking 11 men in your own half any day.
Your myths about how defensive Mackay was bore me.
If Mackay lost 3 nil to the Jacks you'd be crying about it for weeks. Under Ole it seems to have been forgotten.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:42 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
No creativity
Weve scored 10 in the last 4 games and are creating plenty, its stopping them at the other end is the problem but give me that over sticking 11 men in your own half any day.
Your myths about how defensive Mackay was bore me.
If Mackay lost 3 nil to the Jacks you'd be crying about it for weeks. Under Ole it seems to have been forgotten.
So Malky being defensive was a "myth".
OK
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:46 pm
Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
No creativity
Weve scored 10 in the last 4 games and are creating plenty, its stopping them at the other end is the problem but give me that over sticking 11 men in your own half any day.
Your myths about how defensive Mackay was bore me.
If Mackay lost 3 nil to the Jacks you'd be crying about it for weeks. Under Ole it seems to have been forgotten.
So Malky being defensive was a "myth".
OK
Are you laughing though?.
You moan about people going on about Mackay, then you bring him up just to discredit him.
No result under Ole has been as good as Fulham, Man City, Man United or the Jacks.
Those are the games I will remember after the seasons end.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:50 pm
Mario wrote: I won't think "Oh what a lovely battering we got against Liverpool, defensively clueless but fabio did a few runs up the wing, that was great".
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:25 pm
Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:43 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:50 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
How do you work that out?
I was only speaking on behalf of myself, and I am sure Jinks was too.
It was hyperthetical on my behalf anyway as I wont be there next season whatever the division. Tans not getting another penny of mine. Putting season tickets up 16% then offering the extra money to the players as a bonus. Disgusting.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:51 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:53 pm
Forever Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
How do you work that out?
I was only speaking on behalf of myself, and I am sure Jinks was too.
It was hyperthetical on my behalf anyway as I wont be there next season whatever the division. Tans not getting another penny of mine. Putting season tickets up 16% then offering the extra money to the players as a bonus. Disgusting.
Chris, because if fans would prefer to watch exciting/attacking football which I agree it is at this moment, in the Championship next season, than watch what u say would be boring Premier League Football under Tony Pulis, Big Sam etc then they will all turn up next season and we wont have a problem in getting 28,000 plus crowds.
The truth is the minute we are relegated our support will go down by at least 10,000 every home game, which proves my point.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:57 pm
Forever Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
How do you work that out?
I was only speaking on behalf of myself, and I am sure Jinks was too.
It was hyperthetical on my behalf anyway as I wont be there next season whatever the division. Tans not getting another penny of mine. Putting season tickets up 16% then offering the extra money to the players as a bonus. Disgusting.
Chris, because if fans would prefer to watch exciting/attacking football which I agree it is at this moment, in the Championship next season, than watch what u say would be boring Premier League Football under Tony Pulis, Big Sam etc then they will all turn up next season and we wont have a problem in getting 28,000 plus crowds.
The truth is the minute we are relegated our support will go down by at least 10,000 every home game, which proves my point.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:07 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:09 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:55 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Forever Blue wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
![]()
If your both right then City will at least get over 28,000 Crowds next season as the stadium will hold 33,000.
How do you work that out?
I was only speaking on behalf of myself, and I am sure Jinks was too.
It was hyperthetical on my behalf anyway as I wont be there next season whatever the division. Tans not getting another penny of mine. Putting season tickets up 16% then offering the extra money to the players as a bonus. Disgusting.
Chris, because if fans would prefer to watch exciting/attacking football which I agree it is at this moment, in the Championship next season, than watch what u say would be boring Premier League Football under Tony Pulis, Big Sam etc then they will all turn up next season and we wont have a problem in getting 28,000 plus crowds.
The truth is the minute we are relegated our support will go down by at least 10,000 every home game, which proves my point.
As I said I was only speaking on behalf of myself, not anybody else, and I wouldnt expect the majority of people to think like that but thats the way I feel.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:00 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:03 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:I know you are not clued up Annis but someone who does know how to do this should change the word "Natman" to read "Tan Man Red".
The same as Noone changes to No one.
Get Owain on it
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:18 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:50 pm
Mario wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Mario wrote:Jinks wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Rather be in the championship watching Oles style of football than in the premiership watching the brand of football employed by Pulis / Malky / Big Sam.
Same here i want to see games as entertainment not punishment
Don't know what you are watching but we have been playing total shit football for weeks. 5 at the back and hardly any creativity apart from lucky goals like Saturday.
Losing is not entertaining.
No creativity
Weve scored 10 in the last 4 games and are creating plenty, its stopping them at the other end is the problem but give me that over sticking 11 men in your own half any day.
Your myths about how defensive Mackay was bore me.
If Mackay lost 3 nil to the Jacks you'd be crying about it for weeks. Under Ole it seems to have been forgotten.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:56 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:29 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:39 pm
Mario wrote:How do you come up with that stat. When he was sacked we werent in the relegation zone.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:41 pm
Jinks wrote:Mario wrote:How do you come up with that stat. When he was sacked we werent in the relegation zone.
We were just outside the relegation zone with arsenal , man city and man united away please don't tell me malky would have got something out of those games after we made norwich look like real madrid and palace barcelonacheck the stats for Stoke away to
Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:46 pm
Kenfig Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:Mario wrote:How do you come up with that stat. When he was sacked we werent in the relegation zone.
We were just outside the relegation zone with arsenal , man city and man united away please don't tell me malky would have got something out of those games after we made norwich look like real madrid and palace barcelonacheck the stats for Stoke away to
Its amazing aint it, i dont expect this guy to be very bright, but certain posters on here you would think would realise with those teams coming up there was only one way we were heading, the relagation zone! like you said, palace looked like barca against us
Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:05 pm
Jinks wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Jinks wrote:Mario wrote:How do you come up with that stat. When he was sacked we werent in the relegation zone.
We were just outside the relegation zone with arsenal , man city and man united away please don't tell me malky would have got something out of those games after we made norwich look like real madrid and palace barcelonacheck the stats for Stoke away to
Its amazing aint it, i dont expect this guy to be very bright, but certain posters on here you would think would realise with those teams coming up there was only one way we were heading, the relagation zone! like you said, palace looked like barca against us
Norwich had something like 31 shots to our 1