Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:16 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:20 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:21 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:22 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 5:29 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:30 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:54 pm
Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:08 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:01 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:06 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:11 pm
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:41 am
popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:35 am
Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:06 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Both superb players and may well play for England together one day. That being said Barley is really exciting and makes things happen, Mutch has a lot of dross playing around him so it's more difficult.
Mutch is a future international and will not be staying with us in the Championship should we go down.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:54 am
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:07 am
popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:50 am
Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:05 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:This is why you don't rely purely on stats to rate a player/compare players.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:58 am
Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:22 am
Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:29 am
popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:34 am
Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:49 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Actually, go and get the stats for the whole season and Barkley has a the better stats. Better pass, dribble and cross percentage than Mutch, gets fouled more, gets more shots off.etc so if you are going to use stats at least use the whole season, and not their last 4 games.
Pathetic piece of blogging by that Dan Lewis fella.
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/43742
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/92547/
If you want to claim grey areas like the teams they are playing in, then assists are also a massively grey are as you are reliant on somebody else finishing off the chances you create.
I think Barkley is a far better player because hes faster, more powerful and better technically.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:57 pm
popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Actually, go and get the stats for the whole season and Barkley has a the better stats. Better pass, dribble and cross percentage than Mutch, gets fouled more, gets more shots off.etc so if you are going to use stats at least use the whole season, and not their last 4 games.
Pathetic piece of blogging by that Dan Lewis fella.
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/43742
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/92547/
If you want to claim grey areas like the teams they are playing in, then assists are also a massively grey are as you are reliant on somebody else finishing off the chances you create.
I think Barkley is a far better player because hes faster, more powerful and better technically.
Much is 62nd and Barkley is 65th in the EPL player rankings when all the matches are used, so he is still ahead.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:17 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Actually, go and get the stats for the whole season and Barkley has a the better stats. Better pass, dribble and cross percentage than Mutch, gets fouled more, gets more shots off.etc so if you are going to use stats at least use the whole season, and not their last 4 games.
Pathetic piece of blogging by that Dan Lewis fella.
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/43742
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/92547/
If you want to claim grey areas like the teams they are playing in, then assists are also a massively grey are as you are reliant on somebody else finishing off the chances you create.
I think Barkley is a far better player because hes faster, more powerful and better technically.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:25 pm
Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:38 pm
popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Actually, go and get the stats for the whole season and Barkley has a the better stats. Better pass, dribble and cross percentage than Mutch, gets fouled more, gets more shots off.etc so if you are going to use stats at least use the whole season, and not their last 4 games.
Pathetic piece of blogging by that Dan Lewis fella.
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/43742
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/92547/
If you want to claim grey areas like the teams they are playing in, then assists are also a massively grey are as you are reliant on somebody else finishing off the chances you create.
I think Barkley is a far better player because hes faster, more powerful and better technically.
When considering assists, then as Everton have scored 49 to CCFC's 29 then it is obviously easier to get an assist playing for
Everton with their much higher finishing rate, yet Barkley has no assists because he dribbles too much and is selfish with the ball. Mutch on the other hand has more assists and more through balls, yet fewer assists and less pass completion as he goes for the killer ball through to a team mate. Hence, more goals and assists for Mutch and more points for his team. A far better player.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:42 pm
CardiffBatman888 wrote:ross barkley plays for a better team with better players! So therefore it makes him look better...
If Barkley played for Cardiff..he wont look as good as he is!
Wed Apr 02, 2014 4:58 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:popeye21 wrote:CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barkley is a far better player than Mutch
THE STATS SHOW THAT MUTCH IS THE BETTER PLAYER:-
http://www.shoot.co.uk/mutch-key-to-cardiff-survival/
Football is played on grass not on a PC
The stats just back up my view of both players. I see Barkley as a more selfish player which is backed up by his stats on assists and passing, whereas Mutch is a more complete player, hence the good stats across the board. Also, when you take into consideration that Mutch has achieved this playing for a team fighting against relegation as opposed to a team fighting for a Champion's League place, then his performance and stats could be considered to be even better.
Actually, go and get the stats for the whole season and Barkley has a the better stats. Better pass, dribble and cross percentage than Mutch, gets fouled more, gets more shots off.etc so if you are going to use stats at least use the whole season, and not their last 4 games.
Pathetic piece of blogging by that Dan Lewis fella.
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/43742
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/92547/
If you want to claim grey areas like the teams they are playing in, then assists are also a massively grey are as you are reliant on somebody else finishing off the chances you create.
I think Barkley is a far better player because hes faster, more powerful and better technically.
When considering assists, then as Everton have scored 49 to CCFC's 29 then it is obviously easier to get an assist playing for
Everton with their much higher finishing rate, yet Barkley has no assists because he dribbles too much and is selfish with the ball. Mutch on the other hand has more assists and more through balls, yet fewer assists and less pass completion as he goes for the killer ball through to a team mate. Hence, more goals and assists for Mutch and more points for his team. A far better player.
Barkley is faster, more powerful, better passer and better with the ball at his feet.![]()
Thats why he will be going to the World Cup and Mutch wont