malky v ole rubbish

Yes under malky we were more solid at the back but we were poor atacking under ole defensively we are worse but we are better goin forward looking more likely to score overall we aint good enough poor transfers etc ole needs time tan messed up he wanted malky out he should have done it earlier n maybe we wud be in a better position if ole had more time... looking unlikely but we aint down yet need 3 points sat allthough I think palace result today maybe the nail in coffin sunderland home on monday to west ham and there game in hand is home to west brom but they got tough games away .. hope it doesnt come down to las game of season chelsea home sunderland got jacks away ..... personallly I think its too late but we will fight to the end and hope they prove me wrong where cardiff city where always be blue

You have probably made a good point but I stopped reading after the first few words.

We were never solid at the back under MM in the Premier League. That myth needs to stop now because it's a load of crap. Playing defensive doesn't mean you're solid at the back

Under Malky we conceded one less goal than him, 6 games to go under Ole so will obviously concede more but it puts to bed the myth that we were solid at the back under him

The stat proving that myth wrong was posted a while back. ill dig it up later when time

The stat proving that myth wrong was posted a while back. ill dig it up later when time

Ahh ok I must have missed that I stand corrected