Good Turnout For The Protest

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138411

Well done for everyone who went it was a great atmosphere and no violence or racism about looked to be about 3500-4000 thsre

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138411

Well done for everyone who went it was a great atmosphere and no violence or racism about looked to be about 3500-4000 thsre

Yes well done to all. The blue on display inside and outside the ground looked great.

I bet redordead is gutted that there was no trouble. He was waiting to get on his high horse.

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

The police stated 4000 and that is a fact.

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138411

Well done for everyone who went it was a great atmosphere and no violence or racism about looked to be about 3500-4000 thsre

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138411

Very Proud today

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

The police stated 4000 and that is a fact.

Ian its 100% a Fact

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

The police stated 4000 and that is a fact.

It may be a fact that they said it, but it is probably not a fact in terms of the truth.

As i told you on another thread, crowd control protocol in the police force means the police must take into consideration the normal match goers that happen to be on the same route too.

Although 4000 is still 14%-15% - it hardly changes anything.

26,000 home supporters were in the same area, yet only 8%-15% (depending on who you believe) felt it of utmost importance to march for the blue back.

When we marched against Petty we had 2500 then, which was 60% of the match going crowd back then.

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

The police stated 4000 and that is a fact.

It may be a fact that they said it, but it is probably not a fact in terms of the truth.

As i told you on another thread, crowd control protocol in the police force means the police must take into consideration the normal match goers that happen to be on the same route too.

Although 4000 is still 14%-15% - it hardly changes anything.

26,000 home supporters were in the same area, yet only 8%-15% (depending on who you believe) felt it of utmost importance to march for the blue back.

When we marched against Petty we had 2500 then, which was 60% of the match going crowd back then.

The truth is in life/society, most British people dont protest, they moan all week and dont do anything about things, thats the truth and that is in all walks of life.

It was Brilliant/Proud today

Tan will see it as a good turnout for him too.

10% oppose it he said, and 10% is the figure most people are stating. 2500-3000.

The police stated 4000 and that is a fact.

It may be a fact that they said it, but it is probably not a fact in terms of the truth.

As i told you on another thread, crowd control protocol in the police force means the police must take into consideration the normal match goers that happen to be on the same route too.

Although 4000 is still 14%-15% - it hardly changes anything.

26,000 home supporters were in the same area, yet only 8%-15% (depending on who you believe) felt it of utmost importance to march for the blue back.

When we marched against Petty we had 2500 then, which was 60% of the match going crowd back then.

The great Tom petty march, A world of football remembers it well

Agree with that Annis.

But when people are in the same vicinity, going to the same event which the march should indeed be their cause too... You have to be hoping to prove tans 10% theory wrong, nit just that but ruin it and leave him in no doubt.

I questioned the march a few days ago as it wasnt anti tan and couldnt see the point in it as you would be blue with him in charge. In fairness Carl made a good point and said "it is our chance to show Tan that more than 10% oppose the rebrand". And I then said "fair enough and good luck".

So to me, that was the point today. Did you do it? Not for me.

Figures ranging from 8% - 15% of fans marched against the rebrand today and tan will look at that and say "85%-90% dont oppose what im doing as I thought".

Agree with that Annis.

But when people are in the same vicinity, going to the same event which the march should indeed be their cause too... You have to be hoping to prove tans 10% theory wrong, nit just that but ruin it and leave him in no doubt.

I questioned the march a few days ago as it wasnt anti tan and couldnt see the point in it as you would be blue with him in charge. In fairness Carl made a good point and said "it is our chance to show Tan that more than 10% oppose the rebrand". And I then said "fair enough and good luck".

So to me, that was the point today. Did you do it? Not for me.

Figures ranging from 8% - 15% of fans marched against the rebrand today and tan will look at that and say "85%-90% dont oppose what im doing as I thought".

When all four sides of the ground looked this this:



I don't think Tan saw it as a victory.

The great Tom petty march, A world of football remembers it well

It certainly was. It was the catalyst to oust him and propel us to the premier league, although it wasnt done for "people to remember" it was done for the good of our club.

I made a point a few days ago stating that this march seems to be more about looking good for the cameras than actually looking fir blue back. Your comment seems that may not be too far wide of the mark.

Agree with that Annis.

But when people are in the same vicinity, going to the same event which the march should indeed be their cause too... You have to be hoping to prove tans 10% theory wrong, nit just that but ruin it and leave him in no doubt.

I questioned the march a few days ago as it wasnt anti tan and couldnt see the point in it as you would be blue with him in charge. In fairness Carl made a good point and said "it is our chance to show Tan that more than 10% oppose the rebrand". And I then said "fair enough and good luck".

So to me, that was the point today. Did you do it? Not for me.

Figures ranging from 8% - 15% of fans marched against the rebrand today and tan will look at that and say "85%-90% dont oppose what im doing as I thought".

When all four sides of the ground looked this this:



I don't think Tan saw it as a victory.

So you are confident he will change you back?

So you are confident he will change you back?

That wasn't the point. My point was that the large majority were wearing blue today, and there was hardly any red on show.

Just disproving your point that only 10% are against the red.

Agree with that Annis.

But when people are in the same vicinity, going to the same event which the march should indeed be their cause too... You have to be hoping to prove tans 10% theory wrong, nit just that but ruin it and leave him in no doubt.

I questioned the march a few days ago as it wasnt anti tan and couldnt see the point in it as you would be blue with him in charge. In fairness Carl made a good point and said "it is our chance to show Tan that more than 10% oppose the rebrand". And I then said "fair enough and good luck".

So to me, that was the point today. Did you do it? Not for me.

Figures ranging from 8% - 15% of fans marched against the rebrand today and tan will look at that and say "85%-90% dont oppose what im doing as I thought".

When all four sides of the ground looked this this:



I don't think Tan saw it as a victory.

So you are confident he will change you back?

AWSOME PICTURE

' WELL DONE ALL WHO MARCHED/SO PROUD OF EVERYONE '
' OVER 4,000 CARDIFF CITY FANS MARCH TODAY FOR THEIR TRUE IDENTITY BACK '
Full Report
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138411

So you are confident he will change you back?

That wasn't the point. My point was that the large majority were wearing blue today, and there was hardly any red on show.

Just disproving your point that only 10% are against the red.

But not against ot enough to warrant attending the protest a couple of hundred yards away.

Thats the type of fan Tan wants.

So you are confident he will change you back?

That wasn't the point. My point was that the large majority were wearing blue today, and there was hardly any red on show.

Just disproving your point that only 10% are against the red.

But not against ot enough to warrant attending the protest a couple of hundred yards away.

Thats the type of fan Tan wants.

Nobody on here gives a toss of what you think!

Nobody on here gives a toss of what you think!

And Tan doesnt give a toss what the minority think although its always good to be heard

The thing with me is, im pretty much always right so ignore at your peril

Annis why do you let this guy in here? Joke.

We want to be blue

Annis why do you let this guy in here? Joke.

We want to be blue

Always happy to discuss a point..

Which part of only 10% - 15% bothered to go on the march is a "joke" then? Or is this one of these where people want an obvious fact hushed to the point they want someone banned?

Annis why do you let this guy in here? Joke.

We want to be blue

Always happy to discuss a point..

Which part of only 10% - 15% bothered to go on the march is a "joke" then? Or is this one of these where people want an obvious fact hushed to the point they want someone banned?

So you know exactly how many people protested?

So you know exactly how many people protested?

Are you suggesting the figures of 2500 - 4000 are incorrect?

Thats 10%-15%.

So you know exactly how many people protested?

Are you suggesting the figures of 2500 - 4000 are incorrect?

Thats 10%-15%.

No idea what the figure is?

No idea what the figure is?

So if you have no idea what the figure is and im going on a spectrum of what police and actual protesters are saying... Then how come what im saying isnt being accepted by yourself?

No idea what the figure is?

So if you have no idea what the figure is and im going on a spectrum of what police and actual protesters are saying... Then how come what im saying isnt being accepted by yourself?

So you don't know how many
Random.

No idea what the figure is?

So if you have no idea what the figure is and im going on a spectrum of what police and actual protesters are saying... Then how come what im saying isnt being accepted by yourself?

So you don't know how many
Random.

Between 3500 and 4000 according to what police told Annis.

Do you have an actual point here or are you, like most others, happy to castigate someones posts yet less forthcoming when having to actually explain why.