Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:53 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:55 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:56 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:57 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:58 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:14 pm
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:18 pm
G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:18 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:20 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:20 pm
Dylanthomas wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
I think your talking a load of crap TBH
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:24 pm
Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:24 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:29 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:29 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:30 pm
Halifax93 wrote:Some harsh comments here. We've definitely improved over the past 3 games.
But we were admittedly dreadful before that and I just don't think we're good enough.
A miracle over Liverpool and I'll start believing again!
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:30 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:33 pm
Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:36 pm
Taff on the Mersey wrote:Were you at the game? I need to know before I rip the f**k into you!
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:36 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:41 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner
yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:46 pm
Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner
yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.
Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits
Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:08 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner
yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.
Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits
Keeping it real as always, we lost and we aint good enough to stay up if that hurts some tough shit that's my opinion. As for hits I couldn't gouldnt give two hoots how many people come on here.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:14 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Halifax93 wrote:Some harsh comments here. We've definitely improved over the past 3 games.
But we were admittedly dreadful before that and I just don't think we're good enough.
A miracle over Liverpool and I'll start believing again!
Your not allowed to say what you feel as if we are not good enough you know or the world class football watches will tell you diffrent. If we was to get a miracle vs liverpool then maybe but I think that's never going to happen tbh.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:30 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:55 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.
We got a lucky goal from a set piece to today but that's how we score in 90percent of games, you make your own luck and today was nothing to do with luck. We got beat and that's why we are where we are in the league sadly.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:36 pm
alexc wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.
We got a lucky goal from a set piece to today but that's how we score in 90percent of games, you make your own luck and today was nothing to do with luck. We got beat and that's why we are where we are in the league sadly.
Unscrambling this I think it says that our goal was lucky but Everton's mishit winner was not luck? Seriously?
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:16 am
Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Arrow wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.
If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.
But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played
Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap
But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner
yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.
Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits
Keeping it real as always, we lost and we aint good enough to stay up if that hurts some tough shit that's my opinion. As for hits I couldn't gouldnt give two hoots how many people come on here.