Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:53 pm

Simple as that :(
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Same old same old

Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:55 pm

its like deja vu all the f*cking time mun

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:56 pm

Why even bring Zaha on he's shit

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:57 pm

You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:58 pm

We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:14 pm

TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:18 pm

G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.

We got a lucky goal from a set piece to today but that's how we score in 90percent of games, you make your own luck and today was nothing to do with luck. We got beat and that's why we are where we are in the league sadly.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:18 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


I think your talking a load of crap TBH

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:20 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:20 pm

Dylanthomas wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


I think your talking a load of crap TBH

Marshall didn't make 7-8 saves then and we didn't lose 2-1 maybe you was watching another game and result because that's what happened fact.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:24 pm

Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:24 pm

Some harsh comments here. We've definitely improved over the past 3 games.

But we were admittedly dreadful before that and I just don't think we're good enough.

A miracle over Liverpool and I'll start believing again!

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:29 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:29 pm

If it finished 1 - 1 the forum would be completely different.

Out of the remaining games, Everton I had down as unwinnable.

The home games are where it counts and against lower level teams.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:30 pm

Halifax93 wrote:Some harsh comments here. We've definitely improved over the past 3 games.

But we were admittedly dreadful before that and I just don't think we're good enough.

A miracle over Liverpool and I'll start believing again!

Your not allowed to say what you feel as if we are not good enough you know or the world class football watches will tell you diffrent. If we was to get a miracle vs liverpool then maybe but I think that's never going to happen tbh.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:30 pm

Were you at the game? I need to know before I rip the f**k into you!

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:33 pm

Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:36 pm

Taff on the Mersey wrote:Were you at the game? I need to know before I rip the f**k into you!

You carnt rip a phone or pc apart its just words on a screen and opinions and mine is we concead tomany late goals and we are not good enough to stay up.
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:36 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.

Your talking out of your arse.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:41 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.


Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits :wave:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:46 pm

Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.


Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits :wave:

Keeping it real as always, we lost and we aint good enough to stay up if that hurts some tough shit that's my opinion. As for hits I couldn't gouldnt give two hoots how many people come on here.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:08 pm

:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.


Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits :wave:

Keeping it real as always, we lost and we aint good enough to stay up if that hurts some tough shit that's my opinion. As for hits I couldn't gouldnt give two hoots how many people come on here.


:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5: :thumbup:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:14 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Halifax93 wrote:Some harsh comments here. We've definitely improved over the past 3 games.

But we were admittedly dreadful before that and I just don't think we're good enough.

A miracle over Liverpool and I'll start believing again!

Your not allowed to say what you feel as if we are not good enough you know or the world class football watches will tell you diffrent. If we was to get a miracle vs liverpool then maybe but I think that's never going to happen tbh.


I remember you saying we'd lose 5-0 at home to Man City :thumbup:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:30 pm

stop feeding the trolls.

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:55 pm

Bluebird1977 wrote:
G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.

We got a lucky goal from a set piece to today but that's how we score in 90percent of games, you make your own luck and today was nothing to do with luck. We got beat and that's why we are where we are in the league sadly.


Unscrambling this I think it says that our goal was lucky but Everton's mishit winner was not luck? Seriously? :lol:

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:36 pm

alexc wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
G3vans wrote:We were good enough today, we were denied a stone wall penalty once again and they scored a lucky deflected goal and a totally scuffed volley.

We got a lucky goal from a set piece to today but that's how we score in 90percent of games, you make your own luck and today was nothing to do with luck. We got beat and that's why we are where we are in the league sadly.


Unscrambling this I think it says that our goal was lucky but Everton's mishit winner was not luck? Seriously? :lol:

A deflected shot and a mishit shot..no luck there.. LOL
Cala went for the header yet that was lucky..

Pointless reading this fellas posts Alex..

Re: Same old same old - Not good enough

Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:16 am

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Arrow wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
TripleD wrote:You must be looking for bites. Deserves at least a draw so your comment is bullshit. Idiot.

If marshall didn't make 7-8 good saves and we lost 6-1 I would have said the same but we didn't deserve anything from the game BECAUSE we lost meaning we are not good enough. Nothing to do with bites we create 1-2 chances a game and expect are keeper to make half a dozen top saves and still lose in most cases that also means we are not good enough.


But that's why we have a Goal Keeper to make saves, and ffs it was Everton we just played

Yes that's why they are there if we lost 6-1 I'd have still sad we wasn't good enough and some would still say I'm talking crap :laughing6:


But we didn't lose 6-1 it was 2-1 with a very lucky miss hit for the winner :thumbup:

yep so its the same old then we lost. We don't have a good enough squad or manager imo nothing to do with luck as we scored from luck if that's the case.


Ian I use to enjoy reading your posts now you are just a boring doom and gloom poster who is just after hits :wave:

Keeping it real as always, we lost and we aint good enough to stay up if that hurts some tough shit that's my opinion. As for hits I couldn't gouldnt give two hoots how many people come on here.

Still just a load of negative shit as far as I read. Still its your opinion.