Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:09 pm

Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:23 pm

No the mans an idiot anyway

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:33 pm

Stupid question. Its like saying would hitler be a good leader is he didnt kill the jews

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:49 pm

You've just said why the rumours are complete bullshit. If he had taken backhanders, he would have resigned, saved face and been able to continue his career. He wouldn't let himself be sacked then drag it through the courts if he was in the wrong, only a complete moron would do that.

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:04 pm

bluesince62 wrote:Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?


He needs to change us back to blue thats my only thing im not happy with regarding Tan.. Most other things off the field don't really interest me..

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:35 pm

Jinks wrote:
bluesince62 wrote:Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?


He needs to change us back to blue thats my only thing im not happy with regarding Tan.. Most other things off the field don't really interest me..

Turning the debt to equity and turning us back blue for me Jinks.

Re: re-brand aside

Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:44 pm

carlccfc wrote:
Jinks wrote:
bluesince62 wrote:Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?


He needs to change us back to blue thats my only thing im not happy with regarding Tan.. Most other things off the field don't really interest me..

Turning the debt to equity and turning us back blue for me Jinks.


explain the importance of debt to equity............its often said but never explained

Re: re-brand aside

Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:10 am

Its all hypothetical of course,I was just wondering would the hostility towards tan ease at all,and judging by some responses so far,I am not sure.I agree jinks,that a return to blue would go a long way in easing the pain for me,cant see the hitler reference as being relevant personally,although I agree he is doing his damned best to "kill off"the hardcore fans remaining.I promised myself at the end of last season,that I will enjoy our first season of top flight football,no matter what,In the main I have,although It has been a struggle at times to ignore the media coverage.I still think we could survive,and will be kicking every ball with the boys on the pitch,Bloooooooooobirds!!

Re: re-brand aside

Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:13 am

carlccfc wrote:
Jinks wrote:
bluesince62 wrote:Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?


He needs to change us back to blue thats my only thing im not happy with regarding Tan.. Most other things off the field don't really interest me..

Turning the debt to equity and turning us back blue for me Jinks.

Add the proper badge into the equation as well

Re: re-brand aside

Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:28 am

carlccfc wrote:
Jinks wrote:
bluesince62 wrote:Would people change their minds,if at the end of the season,tan came out and gave the reason for moody and malky's sackings were,they were both taking bungs/backhanders.bearing in mind the rumour circulating regards that possibility would opinions change regards tan? Imo it seemed strange that tan asked him to resign,or face the sack,because if malky had resigned,signed a gagging order,he would retain his marketability? Whereas if tan says bungs were taken,malkys marketability would plummet! Therefore giving malky a chance to preserve his future in management? Not in any way saying this is true,but if it was would people change opinions regards tan?


He needs to change us back to blue thats my only thing im not happy with regarding Tan.. Most other things off the field don't really interest me..

Turning the debt to equity and turning us back blue for me Jinks.





^^^^^THIS^^^^^ :thumbup: :thumbup: