Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:27 pm
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:02 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:07 am
Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:14 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:27 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:38 am
AJ1927 wrote:Sometimes you must take a step back to take a bigger step forward.
Get into championship.
Get into a good rhythm and gain some much needed confidence.
Then return to the top flight with some actual momentum.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:59 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:43 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:32 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 8:42 am
CraigCCFC wrote:2nd worse defensive record when Malky left proves that we were infact.....not hard to beat.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:06 am
CraigCCFC wrote:2nd worse defensive record when Malky left proves that we were infact.....not hard to beat.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:08 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:00 am
CraigCCFC wrote:2nd worse defensive record when Malky left proves that we were infact.....not hard to beat.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:03 am
Jinks wrote:Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!
I'm happy because i can see the way Ole wants to set the team out to play. a few players in the next window and we will be fine.
f**k the dreadfull to watch 10 behind the ball and hoofing it rubbish
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:06 am
Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:I wanted Malky Out....Because his relationship with Tan was untenable.
it would have never worked under that strain.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:13 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:I wanted Malky Out....Because his relationship with Tan was untenable.
it would have never worked under that strain.
I got news for you, tans relationship with ole is also not delivering on the pitch either. The common denominator is........I'll let you work that one out.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:18 am
JonCCFC wrote:I can't stand these fans who keep saying "we would be doing better if Malky was in charge" etc, none of you know that. Get over it, he's gone. Stop moaning about Malky and start supporting Ole because the team really needs our support right now.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:20 am
Bluebird64 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:2nd worse defensive record when Malky left proves that we were infact.....not hard to beat.
In all fairness the last few losses were when Malky was trying to run a team and being undermined by Tan.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:26 am
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:42 am
Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:32 pm
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:45 pm
Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:56 pm
Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!
Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:22 am
Brezza wrote:Never in the bottom 3 under Malky. End of.
Tue Mar 04, 2014 10:21 am
Jinks wrote:Brezza wrote:Never in the bottom 3 under Malky. End of.
That old chestnut
Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:28 pm
Brezza wrote:Many were pissed off when we were not playing the free flowing football you wanted under Malky. Yet he made us hard to beat. I remember the criticism for the goalless draw at Stoke which at the time I thought was a great result. This was the team that beat Arsenal yesterday. Now Palace and Stoke under Hughes and Pullis are clawing their way to safety. So would we under Malky? Of course we would because we would have had a system in place with everyone knowing what they were doing. So no bullshitters on here please about free flowing football which you wanted but which Malky knew could not be done in the maiden year. Hope all those who were strong in their opinion are there to supportthe boys next year in if we go down. Mmmm!