Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:28 pm
Id have rather lost 4-3 and had a go, yet another game where it looks like we couldnt score vs a non league team as we dont create anything in the final 3rd this sitting back lark dont help either how do we expect two 5ft 7 guys to win headers vs 6ft 2 spurs center backs off the long balls, its down we go Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:53 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:57 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:04 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:23 pm
Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:05 pm
Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:43 am

Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:50 pm
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:22 pm
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:38 pm
Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:41 pm
Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:43 pm
JimmyJazz wrote:at the moment we couldn't score in a brothel - and when we do, we end up leaving our PIN with the girl on the desk so they can just help themselves at the back...
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:43 pm
daleccfcmapley wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
how about when caulker hit the crossbar?
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:44 pm
daleccfcmapley wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
how about when caulker hit the crossbar?
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:45 pm
Kenfig Blue wrote:daleccfcmapley wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
how about when caulker hit the crossbar?
This. Maybe if malky signed a top striker he would of gone round loris and scored.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:47 pm
Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:daleccfcmapley wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
how about when caulker hit the crossbar?
This. Maybe if malky signed a top striker he would of gone round loris and scored.
Ye. Maybe if Ole didn't sign a load of shit we would have competed yesterday.
Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:49 pm
Willy-Wonka wrote:daleccfcmapley wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Kenfig Blue wrote:Much better than under malky, did we have a shot against spurs at home? I know it was like 27 shots against.
Can you remember when Fraizer went one on one with Lloris v Spurs a few months ago? Probably not. It was 0 - 0 until the 93rd minute.
We could have won that game, unlike yesterday, when we wilted to defeat again.
how about when caulker hit the crossbar?
True. To say that was better than losing to a last minute goal is wrong imo.
That miss was shit though. Alot of people of here said he was unlucky, I just thought it was one of the worst misses I've ever seen.