First goal lucky second offside

:shock:

thats what i watched.................

First goal because we were all over the place after the Marshall save and nobody bothered to pick up Huddlestone
Second goal on side and nobody bothered to pick up the run of Jelovic.

First goal because we were all over the place after the Marshall save and nobody bothered to pick up Huddlestone
Second goal on side and nobody bothered to pick up the run of Jelovic.

Spot on!

First goal because we were all over the place after the Marshall save and nobody bothered to pick up Huddlestone
Second goal on side and nobody bothered to pick up the run of Jelovic.

Spot on!

it took quite a deflection, and once its deflrcted to end up in the net has to be lucky?

3rd Goal - Bad Marking

4th Goal - Stray Pass

Let's be fair Hull's front 2 - looked liked they played upfront together all season .

First goal because we were all over the place after the Marshall save and nobody bothered to pick up Huddlestone
Second goal on side and nobody bothered to pick up the run of Jelovic.

Spot on!

it took quite a deflection, and once its deflrcted to end up in the net has to be lucky?

True, but you make your own luck. We gave him all the time in the world whilst our useless back 4 were busy organising themselves after the Marshall save, ignoring the fact that play hadn't stopped. Someone (Taylor?) should have got out to him quicker and blocked the shot or our midfield tracked him.

Lucky red

Was never offside.

I think that's the first game caulker have had an absolute mare. Worst possible game for him to have one imo. Not sure Taylor is let near a top flight game of football and then there's fabio...

* not sure why Taylor is let near a top flight game

Never offside

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Never offside

The rule states "if any part of your body other than your arms" So why are you lining up the feet you mug?
The players top half of his body is clearly offside from your own evidence.
Still think we would have lost mind as we can't score and can't defend at the moment.

Good to watch at times mind.

Never offside

The rule states "if any part of your body other than your arms" So why are you lining up the feet you mug?
The players top half of his body is clearly offside from your own evidence.
Still think we would have lost mind as we can't score and can't defend at the moment.

Good to watch at times mind.

Ok.

Never offside.

Mug

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

he isnt offside regardless where i measure from

After reading it again, it says anything OTHER than your arms. So arms are ok, i assume because you cant score with your arms.

Ill be back....

Clearly onside.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

First goal lucky second offside

Clutching at straws to say the least

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

he isnt offside regardless where i measure from

yopuve cut his hand off and the ball hasnt left the foot

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

he isnt offside regardless where i measure from

yopuve cut his hand off and the ball hasnt left the foot

What do you mean ive cut his hand off?

Didnt you just tell me to read the rules? Arms and hands cannot be offside. Maybe you should read them?

Hes onside by quite a distance, it isnt even level. And yes the ball has left his foot, hence the blur - its starting its forward motion. Its a frezze frame from sky technology which stops the frame as the ball leaves the foot

Last edited by Roath_Magic_ on Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

First goal lucky second offside

Clutching at straws to say the least

facts, but dont leave that get in the way..............we didnt score and that in itself means we didnt deserve to win, but how about a bit of sense
our players really did try..dominated stats.which is impossible if they were couldnt give a shit lazy bastards.
our fans like to blame tan but truth is,our fans get worse game by game,and those saying most about history and identity are the 1st to be negative........try supporting the team THAT is our history and identity

First goal lucky second offside

Clutching at straws to say the least

facts, but dont leave that get in the way..............we didnt score and that in itself means we didnt deserve to win, but how about a bit of sense
our players really did try..dominated stats.which is impossible if they were couldnt give a shit lazy bastards.
our fans like to blame tan but truth is,our fans get worse game by game,and those saying most about history and identity are the 1st to be negative........try supporting the team THAT is our history and identity

Which part of him was offside then? Do you have your glasses on?

First goal lucky second offside

Clutching at straws to say the least

Its amazing what people convince themselves of when grieving a loss, there is clearly half a yard of space between his upper body and the cardiff defenders foot for gods sake

It's always an excuse with us, why don't we get any offside or lucky goals? That's because we are not creating them, you make your own luck in this game and we just don't have the quality to do so.

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

Why do people argue with Roath and make themselves look idiots in the process? Long is quite clearly ON SIDE, the 4 goals were not lucky or flukes and City were Shiite and embarrassing

It's always an excuse with us, why don't we get any offside or lucky goals? That's because we are not creating them, you make your own luck in this game and we just don't have the quality to do so.

agree. its not lack of effort its a poor squad.
loads of players that are not good enough.

but to have 3 first half attacks and score twice has to have an element of fortune.
we dominate territory.possesion, had more shots and corners..BUT FAILED TO SCORE....AGAIN.....

Never offside

shit angle but even in this he is offside..try reading the rules

Why do people argue with Roath and make themselves look idiots in the process? Long is quite clearly ON SIDE, the 4 goals were not lucky or flukes and City were Shiite and embarrassing

Id say the first one was some what lucky as it wasnt intended by huddlestone. But it was a good strike anyway, a deflection is always one of the possibilities when striking through bodies. Its not like its never happened before.

But yes, long is clearly onside whether you measure from his head, foot, arse or elbow makes no difference.

It's always an excuse with us, why don't we get any offside or lucky goals? That's because we are not creating them, you make your own luck in this game and we just don't have the quality to do so.

agree. its not lack of effort its a poor squad.
loads of players that are not good enough.

but to have 3 first half attacks and score twice has to have an element of fortune.
we dominate territory.possesion, had more shots and corners..BUT FAILED TO SCORE....AGAIN.....

Jelavic and Long are better versions of Campbell and Jones, and them two are nothing special. They will do the job in the champ but are far from good enough for the prem. You would of thought Sunderland getting rid of them both would be a sign they are not good enough for the prem.

Never offside

The rule states "if any part of your body other than your arms" So why are you lining up the feet you mug?
The players top half of his body is clearly offside from your own evidence.
Still think we would have lost mind as we can't score and can't defend at the moment.

Good to watch at times mind.

Ok.

Never offside.

Mug

Draw as many lines as you like. To the naked eye from that shot the players top half of his body is clearly nearer to the goal.
You fucked up by thinking it was foot to foot which is why you erroneously highlighted this.
Like I said mug.
PS. Who didn't know the offside rule.

Never offside

The rule states "if any part of your body other than your arms" So why are you lining up the feet you mug?
The players top half of his body is clearly offside from your own evidence.
Still think we would have lost mind as we can't score and can't defend at the moment.

Good to watch at times mind.

Ok.

Never offside.

Mug

Draw as many lines as you like. To the naked eye from that shot the players top half of his body is clearly nearer to the goal.
You fucked up by thinking it was foot to foot which is why you erroneously highlighted this.
Like I said mug.
PS. Who didn't know the offside rule.

so he is offside because it looks like he is "to the naked eye".... Thats a new one

It makes no difference whether its his foot, head, arse or shoulders... Hes on side, by some distance (mug)