Hammam Hypocrisy

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

Sam bought ice cream though

Agree

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

im no fanof his bazza.him and tan=piss pot sharers

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

Eating ice cream

I personally think he is upto something!His pockets must be being lined with money.

The sooner people realise the role of the chairman the better.

A good chairman is someone who decides how best to spend the money the club earns... Not a chairman that writes endless loan notes in the clubs name.

Hammam and Tan are equally as guilty of this. I remember having a discussion with someone who was attempting to tell me that Huw Jenkins was a terrible chairman because he wasn't rich.

I find the whole episode of Tan and Sam difficult to work out.

At first they were friends then next thing enemies with Tan bringing in forensic accountants. Next thing the club are saying Sam will not be coming back in any shape or form to the club. Now we have him as a Life Presidency whatever that is.

My immediate impressions are that Sam has Tan by the bollocks on something. Then I think a billionaire never gets held to ransom so why is Sam here. Tan must be using Sam for something and I would say it is a lot stronger than just getting him to write a few supportive words in a rag.

The sooner people realise the role of the chairman the better.

A good chairman is someone who decides how best to spend the money the club earns... Not a chairman that writes endless loan notes in the clubs name.

Hammam and Tan are equally as guilty of this. I remember having a discussion with someone who was attempting to tell me that Huw Jenkins was a terrible chairman because he wasn't rich.

Hammam was more wise to public opinion from the fan base. A showman

The sooner people realise the role of the chairman the better.

A good chairman is someone who decides how best to spend the money the club earns... Not a chairman that writes endless loan notes in the clubs name.

Hammam and Tan are equally as guilty of this. I remember having a discussion with someone who was attempting to tell me that Huw Jenkins was a terrible chairman because he wasn't rich.

Jenkins is a failed businessman while Tan is a billionaire international business magnate.

I would say Jenkins has learn't from his mistakes while Tan is learning.

The sooner people realise the role of the chairman the better.

A good chairman is someone who decides how best to spend the money the club earns... Not a chairman that writes endless loan notes in the clubs name.

Hammam and Tan are equally as guilty of this. I remember having a discussion with someone who was attempting to tell me that Huw Jenkins was a terrible chairman because he wasn't rich.

Jenkins is a failed businessman while Tan is a billionaire international business magnate.

I would say Jenkins has learn't from his mistakes while Tan is learning.

Both histories are irrelevant in reality.

The business doesnt have to be created, it is already there, the football club. Past non footballing business success or failure is completely irrelevant. The job of builders merchant and football chairman are completely different, as is Facebook shareholder and convenience store owners.

The job if chairman is to make the best footballing decisions, his bank balance should be irrelevant, in fact it shouldn't even come into it. Huw Jenkins probably has one of the greatest track records for "good decisions" in football.

The minute the chairman starts writing cheques that THE CLUB cannot afford is the minute alarm bells should start ringing. The worry for you guys is that these "chairmen" that write cheques the club cant afford see, to be the ones most desired meaning the Tans and Hammams are the start of a long line of idiot chairmen.

the mans a football parasite he nearly bankrupt the club once and will do it again,didnt he create the problems in the begining.yet some of you think hes a god beware.

Sam bought ice cream though

Did he have a Hull stub aswell

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

Certain posters were on his payroll and part of the inner circle jinks once Sam had his money things changed

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

spot on Jinks............but we all stuck with it.............so the divide in our fans now?
the people that stood firm and strong behind that owner..are the very ones revolting against this one

The sooner people realise the role of the chairman the better.

A good chairman is someone who decides how best to spend the money the club earns... Not a chairman that writes endless loan notes in the clubs name.

Hammam and Tan are equally as guilty of this. I remember having a discussion with someone who was attempting to tell me that Huw Jenkins was a terrible chairman because he wasn't rich.

Jenkins is a failed businessman while Tan is a billionaire international business magnate.

I would say Jenkins has learn't from his mistakes while Tan is learning.

Both histories are irrelevant in reality.

The business doesnt have to be created, it is already there, the football club. Past non footballing business success or failure is completely irrelevant. The job of builders merchant and football chairman are completely different, as is Facebook shareholder and convenience store owners.

The job if chairman is to make the best footballing decisions, his bank balance should be irrelevant, in fact it shouldn't even come into it. Huw Jenkins probably has one of the greatest track records for "good decisions" in football.

The minute the chairman starts writing cheques that THE CLUB cannot afford is the minute alarm bells should start ringing. The worry for you guys is that these "chairmen" that write cheques the club cant afford see, to be the ones most desired meaning the Tans and Hammams are the start of a long line of idiot chairmen.

Simon Lim wrote the cheque yet gets no criticism from the board.

When you work out the common demoninator between Lim and the board you will see where the problem lies.

Absolutely. Both as inept as eachother.

As I said, the minute someone writes a cheque the club cant afford is the minute to panic.

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

spot on Jinks............but we all stuck with it.............so the divide in our fans now?
the people that stood firm and strong behind that owner..are the very ones revolting against this one

The difference is Tan doesn't want an inner circle like Sam did.. If Tan starts inviting fans to high profile events etc you can bet they would be clambering for an invite..

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

spot on Jinks............but we all stuck with it.............so the divide in our fans now?
the people that stood firm and strong behind that owner..are the very ones revolting against this one

The difference is Tan doesn't want an inner circle like Sam did.. If Tan starts inviting fans to high profile events etc you can bet they would be clambering for an invite..

Some fans leaders have had there nose put out

I find it incredible that Hammam jumps into the debate about Malky wasting the clubs money, when his own actions very nearly drove this club into oblivion & his financial actions have clouded the club ever since.

He told loads of lies
He wasted silly amounts of money which he claimed was his? (not loan notes)
He changed the badge
He was going to change the kit colour
He took money from the club even though we were on the brink of oblivion
And still wanted millions in a pay off
He interfered with team selections
Where were these anti Ridsdale anti Tan leaders then

spot on Jinks............but we all stuck with it.............so the divide in our fans now?
the people that stood firm and strong behind that owner..are the very ones revolting against this one

The difference is Tan doesn't want an inner circle like Sam did.. If Tan starts inviting fans to high profile events etc you can bet they would be clambering for an invite..

Some fans leaders have had there nose put out

Some Fans, Have Pride and Want our Identity back above all money,glory and Arse licking Tan.