Alan hansen on MOTD

he said Cardiff were in free fall under malky and ole gunnar has somewhat steadied the ship but still in massive danger, so some people besides Cardiff fans could see how bad we become towards end of malkys tenure at the club

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

I hope we shut that woman savage up. He's doing my head in now. Match of the day went downhill ages ago. Much prefer match choice on sky.

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

you mean alan Hansen seems to forgotten and yeah not all malkys games in prem was bad defensively but some was shocking and we conceded hell of a lot towards the end, I agree the Swansea game was shocking under ole, im more encouraged under ole on an attacking sense but the defense defo needs to tighten up

Personally I didnt feel we had any chance of staying up under Malky, we were found out pretty quickly and in free fall.

Ole has had tough fixtures to start but I can see clear improvements, we now need to pick up some wins thought. I believe we have a fighting chance of staying up now.

Personally I didnt feel we had any chance of staying up under Malky, we were found out pretty quickly and in free fall.

Ole has had tough fixtures to start but I can see clear improvements, we now need to pick up some wins thought. I believe we have a fighting chance of staying up now.

my exact feelings

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

you mean alan Hansen seems to forgotten and yeah not all malkys games in prem was bad defensively but some was shocking and we conceded hell of a lot towards the end, I agree the Swansea game was shocking under ole, im more encouraged under ole on an attacking sense but the defense defo needs to tighten up

No, you seem to have forgotten.

We will never know if we would have stayed up under Mackay, so talking about it is pointless. As saying we 'definitely would have gone down' is just plain wrong.

The fact of the matter is, our best players were bought by Mackay.

Solksjaer has been spending for fun and if we go down, it will be his fault.

Tony Pulis has had less funds and the same time at Palace, look at them. Stop blaming Mackay for the failings of the current manager.

There is still time for ole, so all is not lost.

Solksjaer has been spending for fun and if we go down, it will be his fault.

Sorry, I struggled to take you seriously after you made that statement.

I hate pundits.............most of them have never had the guts to have a go at management........why dont they get people on there who have actually tried it.....and have a bit of charachter.......id rather see barry fry and that nutter who used to manage millwall than that lot.

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

you mean alan Hansen seems to forgotten and yeah not all malkys games in prem was bad defensively but some was shocking and we conceded hell of a lot towards the end, I agree the Swansea game was shocking under ole, im more encouraged under ole on an attacking sense but the defense defo needs to tighten up

No, you seem to have forgotten.

We will never know if we would have stayed up under Mackay, so talking about it is pointless. As saying we 'definitely would have gone down' is just plain wrong.

The fact of the matter is, our best players were bought by Mackay.

Solksjaer has been spending for fun and if we go down, it will be his fault.

Tony Pulis has had less funds and the same time at Palace, look at them. Stop blaming Mackay for the failings of the current manager.

There is still time for ole, so all is not lost.

how have I forgotten then? i just said what alan Hansen said and i agreed but doesn't mean i don't agree about all the games, in my opinion we would of went down under malky and we could very well go down under ole, mackay bought a lot of our best players but also a lot of the shit players, and how have ole been spending for fun? wtf was mackay doing then? buying players on f*cking credit cards?

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

we were 3-0 down at half time in liverpool or have you forgotten that ?

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

you keep spouting this totally unfounded nonsense every time the topic comes up. You seem convinced we would have just waltzed to victories over West ham and villa if malky was in charge and im not sure why.

Personally I didnt feel we had any chance of staying up under Malky, we were found out pretty quickly and in free fall.

Ole has had tough fixtures to start but I can see clear improvements, we now need to pick up some wins thought. I believe we have a fighting chance of staying up now.

my exact feelings

You seem to have forgotten.

Personally I didnt feel we had any chance of staying up under Malky, we were found out pretty quickly and in free fall.

Ole has had tough fixtures to start but I can see clear improvements, we now need to pick up some wins thought. I believe we have a fighting chance of staying up now.

my exact feelings

You seem to have forgotten.

not forgotten anything, results don't lie, by the way theres a typo in your name its "willy-wanka" not "willy-wonka

Personally I didnt feel we had any chance of staying up under Malky, we were found out pretty quickly and in free fall.

Ole has had tough fixtures to start but I can see clear improvements, we now need to pick up some wins thought. I believe we have a fighting chance of staying up now.

my exact feelings

You seem to have forgotten.

not forgotten anything, results don't lie, by the way theres a typo in your name its "willy-wanka" not "willy-wonka

But why have you forgotten.

He also seems to have conveniently forgotten that Malky was in the ring with both hands tied behind this back. Revisionism stinks.

StT.

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

you keep spouting this totally unfounded nonsense every time the topic comes up. You seem convinced we would have just waltzed to victories over West ham and villa if malky was in charge and im not sure why.

So it was nonesense Tan interfered? Malky should have been left alone to get on with it as it is now looking a better option than where we are now.

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

we were 3-0 down at half time in liverpool or have you forgotten that ?

and 3 -0 down at half time in the next game against southampton. second worst defence in the premiership as well but we were competitive and defensively sound though

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

we were 3-0 down at half time in liverpool or have you forgotten that ?

and 3 -0 down at half time in the next game against southampton. second worst defence in the premiership as well but we were competitive and defensively sound though

it was time for malky to go but tbh i think tan should of got rid when moody went think ole would of sorted us out by now just hope its not too late

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

you keep spouting this totally unfounded nonsense every time the topic comes up. You seem convinced we would have just waltzed to victories over West ham and villa if malky was in charge and im not sure why.

So it was nonesense Tan interfered? Malky should have been left alone to get on with it as it is now looking a better option than where we are now.

he didnt interfer with the obscene amount of money that Malky wasted this season, not until it was too late.

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

you keep spouting this totally unfounded nonsense every time the topic comes up. You seem convinced we would have just waltzed to victories over West ham and villa if malky was in charge and im not sure why.

So it was nonesense Tan interfered? Malky should have been left alone to get on with it as it is now looking a better option than where we are now.

he didnt interfer with the obscene amount of money that Malky wasted this season, not until it was too late.

Thats football for you. History shows that.

You listen to pundits?

I still don't know how anyone think Malky would have taken us down. 7 of our 9 home games under Malky were against teams currently in the top 9 of the table and despite Tan's interference and disruption, he still kept us above the relegation zone. It's pretty obvious looking at our home games over the second half of the season, Malky would have got us enough results to keep us n the Premiership, without any shadow of the doubt.

Malky always made us very good at home and we beat Swansea and West Brom 1-0, the only 2 teams we played in the bottom half at home under Malky's reign. Malky deserved the chance to get us results against the rest of the bottom half teams we have left at home and I'm positive Malky would have got us enough results in these games to not only keep us in the Premiership, but finish the second half of the season stronger than the first half of the season to push us towards mid table.

you keep spouting this totally unfounded nonsense every time the topic comes up. You seem convinced we would have just waltzed to victories over West ham and villa if malky was in charge and im not sure why.

So it was nonesense Tan interfered? Malky should have been left alone to get on with it as it is now looking a better option than where we are now.

he didnt interfer with the obscene amount of money that Malky wasted this season, not until it was too late.

The money Malky "wasted" this season helped keep our team above the relegation zone.

Solksjaer has been spending for fun and if we go down, it will be his fault.

Sorry, I struggled to take you seriously after you made that statement.

Me to Ole spent around 6 mil on 7 players, malky spent between 40-50 mil on players and only 2 of them really play, caulker and Medel eikrem looks a quality buy to me, some of the tackles and passes he was making against villa were quality, he could do a good job sitting in front of the defence. You could see daelhi has quality as well, when he develops more he will be a city star. With cala and possibly guerra to come ole has brought in top players on the cheap, looking forward to seeing what he can do in a full summer, not just a few weeks in jan which is known to be a hard time to buy.

he said Cardiff were in free fall under malky and ole gunnar has somewhat steadied the ship but still in massive danger, so some people besides Cardiff fans could see how bad we become towards end of malkys tenure at the club

If therewas a decsent into free fallit startedAFTER Tan began playing games with Malky and his staff.

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

Remind me again, how many points did we get from those games?

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

Remind me again, how many points did we get from those games?

We were in a higher league position

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

Remind me again, how many points did we get from those games?

Beat Fulham (my favourite moment of this season) , Man City, Swansea, West Brom.

Drew to Man United, close game v Spurs. Drew against Everton. Got bummed against newcastle, Saints, Arsenal, Chelsea but what did we expect?.

I'm more in favour of giving a manager time in the top flight. We would have been in a better position now if we still had mackay imo.

You seem to have forgotten how up the players were for the game at Anfield. We were competitive and defensively ok in every single game.

I have never seen defending like that at Swansea.

We played well against Man City, that is it so far under Ole.

you mean alan Hansen seems to forgotten and yeah not all malkys games in prem was bad defensively but some was shocking and we conceded hell of a lot towards the end, I agree the Swansea game was shocking under ole, im more encouraged under ole on an attacking sense but the defense defo needs to tighten up

Wrong when Mackay left we had the second worst defensive record in the league and worst scoring record, for a manager that prided himself on strong back line up and parking the bus not to concede he wasn't really do a good job of it
We were losing anyway so making the change was necessary

No, you seem to have forgotten.

We will never know if we would have stayed up under Mackay, so talking about it is pointless. As saying we 'definitely would have gone down' is just plain wrong.

The fact of the matter is, our best players were bought by Mackay.

Not really our line up most of this season is still 90% of what it was in the championship and the only reason it's like that is because what he bought was worse than what we already had so he had no choice but to stick with what he had already bought for the championship season prior

Solksjaer has been spending for fun and if we go down, it will be his fault.

£6m out

£3m in

£3 spent good value for seven players

£10m lost on Cornelius alone without Bradford etc (BITH MALKY SIGNINGS)

Tony Pulis has had less funds and the same time at Palace, look at them. Stop blaming Mackay for the failings of the current manager.

Pulis has had far more time and games since arriving at palace in October not December you gimp

There is still time for ole, so all is not lost.

I'm sure you are a jack on a wind up

If not your just a complete whopper who has absolutely no idea what your on about!