So Frustrating.

So should've been 3points but that's football. Well done Turner. All I can say is Aston Villa were poor tonight.

So should've been 3points but that's football. Well done Turner. All I can say is Aston Villa were poor tonight.

Feck me they battered you second half.

Was you watching the same game tHen??? In the end we were lucky to escape with a point

Watched a different game to me then.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Running out of steam again in the last 20 minutes.

Was you watching the same game tHen??? In the end we were lucky to escape with a point

or maybe he trying to stay positive and not being a negative tw*t

Watched a different game to me then.

closet Cardiff fan

Was you watching the same game tHen??? In the end we were lucky to escape with a point

or maybe he trying to stay positive and not being a negative tw*t

By lying to himself?

Realism is always the best way to deal with anything.

Villa were shit mun, but still out played scumdiff

So should've been 3points but that's football. Well done Turner. All I can say is Aston Villa were poor tonight.

Feck me they battered you second half.

Exactly, we need to be better. The diagonal should have been stamped out early in the second half.

Villa were shit mun, but still out played scumdiff

bet that put a smile on your face saying scumdiff how old are you

Was you watching the same game tHen??? In the end we were lucky to escape with a point

or maybe he trying to stay positive and not being a negative tw*t

Not being negative at all just trying to point out the obvious to people trying to gloss over yet another poor performance
I don't know why we are so poor I can summise but people probably won't like what I'm saying

We were told ole will play attacking football I've yet to see any of that on offer, we've maybe tried using the wings a bit more but our problem remains that we just cannot get hold of the ball, we lose the midfield battle game after game and lost it again tonight and get overrun for it, in order to build good attack you need a midfielder who can be calm and cool in the centre of attack to build play up we just ain't got one, Eikrem looks a possibility with some nice passing and calmness forst 15 mins after he came on but he was non existent second half, we were too deep which doesn't help and at one point I had to check of we were home or away

Medel is overweight hadn't really noticed t before but he got skinned a few times by players who weren't that quick

The only player I thought showed any spirit was Ben turner he was absolutely brilliant today showed what he was made of after a poor game at Swansea where he was made a scapegoat for an all round poor team effort today he was a rock not the quickest but his positioning and will to win each tackle today showed a guy with spirit and commitment to our cause blocked everything and covered for John and caulker more than he should have needed to tonight

Well done ben

We had the first half, they had the second.

Watched a different game to me then.

OK, out of all those shots Villa had, how many times in your opinion was Marshall troubled?

Watched a different game to me then.

OK, out of all those shots Villa had, how many times in your opinion was Marshall troubled?

More troubled than Guzan was.

It wasnt just Marshall it was last minute blocks. Agbonlahor completely through on goal 6 yards out and KTC put in a worldy tackle to take it off his toes, similar with Benteke and Delph had another gilt edged chance which was taken away in a last ditch effort.

I dont really remember Guzan or the defenders having to do crazy things to keep it level. Where as I can think of 4 or 5 you guys had to pull off.

Watched a different game to me then.

OK, out of all those shots Villa had, how many times in your opinion was Marshall troubled?

More troubled than Guzan was.

It wasnt just Marshall it was last minute blocks. Agbonlahor completely through on goal 6 yards out and KTC put in a worldy tackle to take it off his toes, similar with Benteke and Delph had another gilt edged chance which was taken away in a last ditch effort.

I dont really remember Guzan or the defenders having to do crazy things to keep it level. Where as I can think of 4 or 5 you guys had to pull off.

really? Marshall stopped anything that was required of him. Guzan was well beaten but saved by the bar. Beaten again but our player was offside.

Its clear you jacks are just on a wind up with this one.

Villa were shit mun, but still out played scumdiff

bet that put a smile on your face saying scumdiff how old are you

Mental age of 12 had too many bad experiences at the hands of ccfc fans back in the day

Watched a different game to me then.

OK, out of all those shots Villa had, how many times in your opinion was Marshall troubled?

More troubled than Guzan was.

It wasnt just Marshall it was last minute blocks. Agbonlahor completely through on goal 6 yards out and KTC put in a worldy tackle to take it off his toes, similar with Benteke and Delph had another gilt edged chance which was taken away in a last ditch effort.

I dont really remember Guzan or the defenders having to do crazy things to keep it level. Where as I can think of 4 or 5 you guys had to pull off.

really? Marshall stopped anything that was required of him. Guzan was well beaten but saved by the bar. Beaten again but our player was offside.

Its clear you jacks are just on a wind up with this one.

Yes you hit the woodwork twice. Ive not denied you had the better of the first half. Not sure how you can say he was beaten though, neither shot went in so how could he be beaten. Cant we say any shots that go wide "beat the keeper"?

Not sure how you can count the disallowed goal either, Zaha was 6 yards offside

They destroyed you in the second half though, take a look at the stats. They had double the goalscoring chances you had. Why would I be winding you up? I think the majority of cardiff fans have also said this.

So why "should" you have won exactly?

Watched a different game to me then.

OK, out of all those shots Villa had, how many times in your opinion was Marshall troubled?

More troubled than Guzan was.

It wasnt just Marshall it was last minute blocks. Agbonlahor completely through on goal 6 yards out and KTC put in a worldy tackle to take it off his toes, similar with Benteke and Delph had another gilt edged chance which was taken away in a last ditch effort.

I dont really remember Guzan or the defenders having to do crazy things to keep it level. Where as I can think of 4 or 5 you guys had to pull off.

really? Marshall stopped anything that was required of him. Guzan was well beaten but saved by the bar. Beaten again but our player was offside.

Its clear you jacks are just on a wind up with this one.

Yes you hit the woodwork twice. Ive not denied you had the better of the first half.

Not sure how you can count the disallowed goal though Zaha was 6 yards offside

They destroyed you in the second half though, take a look at the stats. They had double the goalscoring chances you had. Wy would I be winding you up? I think the majority of cardiff fans have also said this.

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Neither team did enough to win it, end of

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Im saying neither side dominated, we were better in the first, they were better in the 2nd. Draw was a fair result. Arsenal destroyed us at home. Aston Villa didnt.

But because Villa had more shots of which only 2 actually troubled Marshall the same amount of shots that troubled Guzman btw, you think they did. So by your logic anytime a team has more shots overall than the other side they have destroyed them. So say for you, Norwich away you were destroyed purely because they had more shots than you.

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Im saying neither side dominated, we were better in the first, they were better in the 2nd. Draw was a fair result. Arsenal destroyed us at home. Aston Villa didnt.

But because Villa had more shots of which only 2 actually troubled Marshall the same amount of shots that troubled Guzman btw, you think they did. So by your logic anytime a team has more shots overall than the other side they have destroyed them. So say for you, Norwich away you were destroyed purely because they had more shots than you.

I said they destroyed you IN THE SECOND HALF. Which they did.

Im not saying what you are suggesting at all. You rarely got the ball out of your half in the second half, it was an onslaught. Last ditch challenges, world class saves and poor finishing was the only reason they didnt break through.

Same with you game against Norwich. They completely destroyed you, yet it was 0-0. They had 30 shots on goal didnt they? Yet by your logic it was an even game

Ive not once said you deserved to lose so im not quite sure what you are taking issue with me for. Surely you should be directing these questions at the OP that seems to think you deserved to win. As it seems we both disagree with him.

Neither team did enough to win it, end of

Never said otherwise.

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Im saying neither side dominated, we were better in the first, they were better in the 2nd. Draw was a fair result. Arsenal destroyed us at home. Aston Villa didnt.

But because Villa had more shots of which only 2 actually troubled Marshall the same amount of shots that troubled Guzman btw, you think they did. So by your logic anytime a team has more shots overall than the other side they have destroyed them. So say for you, Norwich away you were destroyed purely because they had more shots than you.

I said they destroyed you IN THE SECOND HALF. Which they did.

Im not saying what you are suggesting at all. You rarely got the ball out of your half in the second half, it was an onslaught. Last ditch challenges, world class saves and poor finishing was the only reason they didnt break through.

Same with you game against Norwich. They completely destroyed you, yet it was 0-0. They had 30 shots on goal didnt they? Yet by your logic it was an even game

Ive not once said you deserved to lose so im not quite sure what you are taking issue with me for. Surely you should be directing these questions at the OP that seems to think you deserved to win. As it seems we both disagree with him.

You used the match stats to back up 6 fingers claim that we were battered. So im using match stats to claim you were destroyed by Norwich away. Am i right?

Marshall was troubled by villa twice, out of all those shots. Defenders made blocks and tackles but thats what they get paid to do.

You say your not on a wind up.

So if a team has more shots than their opponents then they have destroyed them?

So anytime any team has had more shots than swansea by your logic you were destroyed?

Im not entirely sure what you are getting at. Are you saying you were not dominated in the second half? Or didnt dominate in the first?

Are you saying nobody deserved to win because everybody did what they were paid to do and nobody scored?

If so then why are you disagreeing with me that you didnt deserve to win. You are being quite contradictory at the moment. Why did you deserve to win and Villa didnt?

Im saying neither side dominated, we were better in the first, they were better in the 2nd. Draw was a fair result. Arsenal destroyed us at home. Aston Villa didnt.

But because Villa had more shots of which only 2 actually troubled Marshall the same amount of shots that troubled Guzman btw, you think they did. So by your logic anytime a team has more shots overall than the other side they have destroyed them. So say for you, Norwich away you were destroyed purely because they had more shots than you.

I said they destroyed you IN THE SECOND HALF. Which they did.

Im not saying what you are suggesting at all. You rarely got the ball out of your half in the second half, it was an onslaught. Last ditch challenges, world class saves and poor finishing was the only reason they didnt break through.

Same with you game against Norwich. They completely destroyed you, yet it was 0-0. They had 30 shots on goal didnt they? Yet by your logic it was an even game

Ive not once said you deserved to lose so im not quite sure what you are taking issue with me for. Surely you should be directing these questions at the OP that seems to think you deserved to win. As it seems we both disagree with him.

You used the match stats to back up 6 fingers claim that we were battered. So im using match stats to claim you were destroyed by Norwich away. Am i right?

No I didnt. I used the stats to show you didn't deserve to win, it had nothing to do with bysedds comments, in fact i think we posted our posts simultaneously.

My opinion that you were destroyed in the second half was based on the fact you could barely get out of your half while Villa had several gilt edged chances.

Similarly like we destroyed you in the second half. We still would have destroyed you in the second half irrespective of if we scored or not.

No I didnt. I used the stats to show you didn't deserve to win, it had nothing to do with bysedds comments, in fact i think we posted our posts simultaneously.

My opinion that you were destroyed in the second half was based on the fact you could barely get out of your half while Villa had several gilt edged chances.

Similarly like we destroyed you in the second half. We still would have destroyed you in the second half irrespective of if we scored or not.

You still used the stats as if they explain everything about a football match. Only 2 of those shots had Marshall worried. The stats can be misleading.

We were not destroyed yesterday at all. We were under pressure but were never getting destroyed. Like I said Arsenal at home we were destroyed.

We deserved a point yesterday, if we had been destroyed like you claim then we wouldnt have deserved f*ck all.

No I didnt. I used the stats to show you didn't deserve to win, it had nothing to do with bysedds comments, in fact i think we posted our posts simultaneously.

My opinion that you were destroyed in the second half was based on the fact you could barely get out of your half while Villa had several gilt edged chances.

Similarly like we destroyed you in the second half. We still would have destroyed you in the second half irrespective of if we scored or not.

You still used the stats as if they explain everything about a football match. Only 2 of those shots had Marshall worried. The stats can be misleading.

No i didnt. We all saw the match, my stats assisted what we all saw and were not based on what we all saw. Im yet to see a match were someone deserved to win a match after having half as many goalscoring chances as the other side. Can you name one?

We were not destroyed yesterday at all. We were under pressure but were never getting destroyed. Like I said Arsenal at home we were destroyed.

you were certainly destroyed in the second half. There isnt getting around it, you were.

We deserved a point yesterday, if we had been destroyed like you claim then we wouldnt have deserved f*ck all.

you are missing out "second half". If the whole match went the same way as the first half then you would have deserved anything. Luckily for you, you showed enough in the first half to warrant a point as it was Villa clinging on.

Not sure what you are arguing about really.

No I didnt. I used the stats to show you didn't deserve to win, it had nothing to do with bysedds comments, in fact i think we posted our posts simultaneously.

My opinion that you were destroyed in the second half was based on the fact you could barely get out of your half while Villa had several gilt edged chances.

Similarly like we destroyed you in the second half. We still would have destroyed you in the second half irrespective of if we scored or not.

You still used the stats as if they explain everything about a football match. Only 2 of those shots had Marshall worried. The stats can be misleading.

No i didnt. We all saw the match, my stats assisted what we all saw and were not based on what we all saw. Im yet to see a match were someone deserved to win a match after having half as many goalscoring chances as the other side. Can you name one?

We were not destroyed yesterday at all. We were under pressure but were never getting destroyed. Like I said Arsenal at home we were destroyed.

you were certainly destroyed in the second half. There isnt getting around it, you were.

We deserved a point yesterday, if we had been destroyed like you claim then we wouldnt have deserved f*ck all.

you are missing out "second half". If the whole match went the same way as the first half then you would have deserved anything. Luckily for you, you showed enough in the first half to warrant a point as it was Villa clinging on.

Not sure what you are arguing about really.

Disagree.

I know.