Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:46 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:57 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:58 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:01 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:05 pm
Green Arrow wrote:The right decision and a win for common sense. Chico could have died.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:06 pm
Green Arrow wrote:The right decision and a win for common sense. Chico could have died.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:06 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Green Arrow wrote:The right decision and a win for common sense. Chico could have died.
#prayforchico
Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:18 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:14 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Ridicolous decision but at least it helps us.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:17 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:20 pm
PremierJacks wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ridicolous decision but at least it helps us.
Why is it a ridiculous decision?
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:24 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:24 pm
welshrarebit wrote:As much as I think Chico was ridiculous with his over reaction, does anyone else think he has done us a favour?? West Ham are undoubtedly better with Carol than without. So West Ham are now weaker for the next 3 games and that's 3 games less than he has to get more match fitness/sharpness.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:25 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:PremierJacks wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:Ridicolous decision but at least it helps us.
Why is it a ridiculous decision?
Because it was never a red in the first place
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:26 pm
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:33 pm
Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:35 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
That's "measles" you illiterate
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:39 pm
Aramore wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
That's "measles" you illiterate
Thank you for improving my spelling
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:40 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
That's "measles" you illiterate
Thank you for improving my spelling
My pleasure. The standard of spelling on here is truly appalling. Are most of you skipping school?
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:41 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
That's "measles" you illiterate
Thank you for improving my spelling
My pleasure. The standard of spelling on here is truly appalling. Are most of you skipping school?
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:42 pm
Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Aramore wrote:Should be a 12 match ban.
Send out the wrong message from the FA here, this was way worse than Suarez biting Ivanovic ffs.
Players need to realise there's a health and safety issue here. touching a Jack b*stard could have caused him to transport measels to everyone in London.
That's "measles" you illiterate
Thank you for improving my spelling
My pleasure. The standard of spelling on here is truly appalling. Are most of you skipping school?
Just as bad as your grammar. Where's the full stop on the end of illiterate?
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:43 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:45 pm
Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:46 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Hmmmmm,!
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:47 pm
Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:57 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Surely your not suggesting that!
Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:59 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Surely your not suggesting that!
Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:01 pm
City Slicker wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Green Arrow wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Actually, a full stop is punctuation, not grammar.
Same thing.
Surely your not suggesting that!
If you were "punctual" at school and listened what your "Gramma" told you, you'd realise punctuation is a necessary grammatical construct. Mot wishing to "puncture" your ego of course, but that's a fact ...full stop!
Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:02 pm
pcs1963 wrote:Hey pineman