Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:48 am
Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:52 am
MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:57 am
MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:22 am
Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:23 am
wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:29 am
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:32 am
Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:57 pm
Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:06 pm
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:11 pm
wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:17 pm
JB39. wrote:People need to realise we're entering admin sooner or later. Its not a case of if the bubble is going to burst but when its going to burst.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:20 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:JB39. wrote:People need to realise we're entering admin sooner or later. Its not a case of if the bubble is going to burst but when its going to burst.
Dalman said we are in process of converting debt to equity and it will be done by end feb. How and why would Tan put us in admin?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:24 pm
Castro wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:JB39. wrote:People need to realise we're entering admin sooner or later. Its not a case of if the bubble is going to burst but when its going to burst.
Dalman said we are in process of converting debt to equity and it will be done by end feb. How and why would Tan put us in admin?
Why would tan write off all that money? Makes no sense.
He wont put you into admin while he owns you. However if relegated the company wont generate the money needed to keep it affloat which means we will need to cover it or try and get his money back.
I know what I would do.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:33 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Castro wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:JB39. wrote:People need to realise we're entering admin sooner or later. Its not a case of if the bubble is going to burst but when its going to burst.
Dalman said we are in process of converting debt to equity and it will be done by end feb. How and why would Tan put us in admin?
Why would tan write off all that money? Makes no sense.
He wont put you into admin while he owns you. However if relegated the company wont generate the money needed to keep it affloat which means we will need to cover it or try and get his money back.
I know what I would do.
He is in too deep to send us into admin. He would bankroll us to the prem again.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:37 pm
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:43 pm
JB39. wrote:Nobody is going to buy us FFS.![]()
Either Tan stays and we keep adding debt or Tan goes, asset strips and we enter admin.
Why would a buyer purchase all that debt when they can wait for us to enter admin and buy us at the 11th hour for next to nothing?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:49 pm
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:58 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Expected profits 0f £30million this season.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:06 pm
Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:07 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Don't know why you are bothering arguing with the wind up boy. He hasn't got a clue
Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:33 pm
Castro wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Don't know why you are bothering arguing with the wind up boy. He hasn't got a clue
Don't think anybody is arguing in this thread pal.
If you disagree then speak up, if not then you aren't really adding anything to the thread are you.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:55 pm
Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:37 pm
wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
and considering he is a swans fan he likes to think he is expert on our clubs finances! Sun Jan 19, 2014 7:14 pm
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
its funny wez he never responds when he knows he cannot substanciate his figures, no one knows presise figures so anything quoted on here are guess work at best!and considering he is a swans fan he likes to think he is expert on our clubs finances!
Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:39 pm
wez1927 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
its funny wez he never responds when he knows he cannot substanciate his figures, no one knows presise figures so anything quoted on here are guess work at best!and considering he is a swans fan he likes to think he is expert on our clubs finances!
Got him fucked just on the tv money Allen ,the guy hasn't got a clue our premier club money is more than the Jack's season ticket monies ,bigger club more in come than the Jack's lol
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:16 pm
wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:18 pm
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
its funny wez he never responds when he knows he cannot substanciate his figures, no one knows presise figures so anything quoted on here are guess work at best!and considering he is a swans fan he likes to think he is expert on our clubs finances!
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:20 pm
Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:wez1927 wrote:Castro wrote:MalkyandBlueIN wrote:New Chinese business man named Wang Jianlin will bid to buy Southampton football club. They didn't struggle to find a new buyer so why do many people argue that if Tan was to leave a new owner wouldn't be interested. IMO we are much more of an attractive club than Soton being the Capital. Opinions?
Fulham are based in a capital too arent they? Makes little difference.
Southampton have a cracking squad, little debt and sit in the top 10. They have a history of Premier League experience and are quite well known.
Cardiff have a poor squad, about £200m of debt, been in the top flight once in 50 years and sit bottom of the league.
So to buy Tans share of maybe £100m and take on the £200m debt you are looking at a similar price as you would expect to pay for a European club let alone relegation favourites.
200 million of debt are you having a laugh ?
You think its less?
yes much less we are not in the championship anymore this years income will top 100 million mark not 18 million like in the champion ship to say there will be a jump of 80 million in the debt is wrong as we would of lost 180 miliion in a one season the debt will be around the same level of 118 or maybe a bit less
not a chance. Income will be about £65m this year.
You were in £118m of debt prior to the season starting.
You have since spent circa £60m on players, the wage budget will be pushing £40-45m, you still have costs to be covered such as amortised transfer fees from the £12m spent last year on top of extras such as stadium expansion and running costs.
You are on course to post an extra debt of £55m this year. Transfer fees will be amortised but you will still owe the whole amount, just spread out.
So thats £173m debt by season end and thats just off the top of my head.
its 63 million just in tv money to finish bottom this year you moronwith gates all premier seats income and increased sponsorship ie 6 million just from Malaysian government it will more likey around the 100 million mark but yor a jack and you know better
Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.
Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:25 pm
Aramore wrote:Castro wrote:
Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.
Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-6107698
"The Minister revealed the deal was worth £7.35m in total,"
Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:29 pm
Castro wrote:Aramore wrote:Castro wrote:
Your season ticket money was included in your accounts for last year. The only thing that we can count is the walk up, but that will probably just cover the costs of policing, staff etc.
Yes you do have whatever the Malaysian Government pay for ONE year. But I dont think its £6m is it?
Your figure is wild.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-6107698
"The Minister revealed the deal was worth £7.35m in total,"
From the link:-
International accountant Keith Morgan, a director of Mazars as well as of Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust, said: “To be honest, when I saw the figures for sponsorship quoted in the Malaysian Parliament, they didn’t appear to tally with figures that have already been announced in connection with Cardiff City. A sum of £500,000 has been mentioned, which actually seems a bit low. Maybe the sums mentioned in Malaysia are to be spread over more than one season.