Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:14 pm
Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:18 pm
Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:19 pm
Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:24 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:This time last season they were slating Southampton's Nicola Cortese for sacking Adkins and his "lack of football knowledge" they are wanking him off at the moment claiming how brilliant he is for sacking Adkins.......funny old game.....what a difference a year and some good results make. This time in 12 months.....who knows
Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:48 pm
JB39. wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:This time last season they were slating Southampton's Nicola Cortese for sacking Adkins and his "lack of football knowledge" they are wanking him off at the moment claiming how brilliant he is for sacking Adkins.......funny old game.....what a difference a year and some good results make. This time in 12 months.....who knows
Bunch of old has beens. The only 2 people worth listening to are Neville and Carragher as they've just come out of the modern game. Neville seems to be above and beyond but Jamie is still worth listening to. The rest are so out of touch with football these days its enough to make anyone cringe.
They're pundits (media people), not managers, and they haven't a clue, which was proven by them saying Malky didn't deserve the sack when it was quite clear towards the end of his time here he did. The media like to build them up and knock them down and had Malky taken us down it would have been no different. He would have got slated as a manager who's out of his depth etc. but by then it would have been too late for us.
I hate the media and its entire culture - vultures. Id rather have a pint with Neville and listen to him talk. The guy oozes class and knowledge when it comes to the game. The rest ain't got a clue.
Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:54 pm
Blue_Always wrote:If you're posts on here in the last year are any measure then Gary Neville would have to visit you in a mental institute for this hypothetical meeting of football minds to happen.
I'd pay to watch it on pay per view.
Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:06 pm
JB39. wrote:Blue_Always wrote:If you're posts on here in the last year are any measure then Gary Neville would have to visit you in a mental institute for this hypothetical meeting of football minds to happen.
I'd pay to watch it on pay per view.
Got to love people on the internet who think they know people. It's laughable. Judging by how you follow me around on the forum to quote me and take sly digs I'd say its quite possible you suffer from an obsessive/compulsive disorder yourself.
People in glass houses..............
Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:22 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Got to love people who read into a statement only the parts they want to see, ignoring the full picture, thus distorting their own perception of reality. a very worrying characteristic and a possible precursor to a delusional mental disorder which definitely is treated with a stay on a psychiatric unit. Barnett I clearly stated that *IF* you were anything like in real life, what your posts here suggest. that means I don't claim to know you and give the benefit of doubt.
O.C.D is largely an anxiety disorder not of the nature to be treated in a mental institute. Nor is it the mental illness associated with stalking an individual. As an example, Roathie is an obsessive but doesn't have O.C.D (in my opinion) Roathie does have the profile of a stalker, that's not to say he is a stalker or he is a malicious man. I do believe there;s potential for him to stalk somebody like citygent. One of the main difference in obsessives. Somebody with O.C.D regard there Obsessive thoughts as unwelcome & intrusive. somebody like roathie with an obsessive personality see nothing wrong with their obsessive behaviour.
Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:26 pm
Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:51 pm
JB39. wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Got to love people who read into a statement only the parts they want to see, ignoring the full picture, thus distorting their own perception of reality. a very worrying characteristic and a possible precursor to a delusional mental disorder which definitely is treated with a stay on a psychiatric unit. Barnett I clearly stated that *IF* you were anything like in real life, what your posts here suggest. that means I don't claim to know you and give the benefit of doubt.
Im perfectly fine thanks and always have been. I just come on here for a bit of a laugh and to talk about football. I don't get emotional over the internet like Barry Chuckles etc. because i don't really care enough to do so.O.C.D is largely an anxiety disorder not of the nature to be treated in a mental institute. Nor is it the mental illness associated with stalking an individual. As an example, Roathie is an obsessive but doesn't have O.C.D (in my opinion) Roathie does have the profile of a stalker, that's not to say he is a stalker or he is a malicious man. I do believe there;s potential for him to stalk somebody like citygent. One of the main difference in obsessives. Somebody with O.C.D regard there Obsessive thoughts as unwelcome & intrusive. somebody like roathie with an obsessive personality see nothing wrong with their obsessive behaviour.
I just think Roathie comes on here because he's bored in Australia. Thats my opinion. Its not a massive footballing nation so he probably wants to discuss football with people from Britain or those with as much an active interest as him.
Again, I don't really care enough. I have enough people to care about in my day to day life without worrying about people on the internet i've never met.
Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:18 pm
Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:44 pm
JB39. wrote:Im perfectly fine. Thanks for your concern but its truly laughable. I have self awareness and I know that but I just don't take the internet as seriously as you and can have a laugh. My offering to meet Polo was a joke thread that some just took way too seriously. Polo is one of the few people on this forum who is up for a laugh and doesn't take things too seriously but he's also very opinionated when it comes to football because he sees through all the nonsense like me.
Also, as for criticising BU, I have done, and I have even told Sian I have criticised BU because I'm a straight up person. I now respect them for what they're doing. Does that mean I support them? No, but I respect them for standing up for what they believe is right for them.
I offered to meet and talk with you. Nothing wrong with that. Im not and never have been a violent person and never will be if thats what you're getting at. I used to box but I see that as a sport, not violence. I don't enjoy fighting for the sake of it and I see fighting on the street or for no reason as infantile, daft and pointless. What does it solve? I don't agree with our hooligan past either and find it cringeworthy and embarrassing but those were the times and its part of our history and the history of many other clubs.
Again, stop thinking you know people over the internet because you don't. I also find it illogical that you try and diagnose somebody (a person you've never met by the way) with an array of disorders yet you seem to be quite happy to live out your fantasy of playing internet detective online. You remind me of the main character in Shutter Island.
Ive done well in life thanks - get on well with family, good education, clean criminal record, never had an addiction to anything - very rarely drink and never done drugs, good ambitions, good relationships both in my personal and professional life etc. - I'm fine. I have arthritis but it don't get me down as I've had many years of disappointment as a City fan so theres not a chance I'm going to let arthritis get me down.![]()
Anyway, the offer is still on the table if you wish to meet for a civilised talk and drink. I have admitted to winding people up online but I'm totally different in person. You can never judge anyone entirely online because the internet leaves out so many variables - body language, interpretation and so on. Its inherently daft to think you can do so. Do I have a disorder? No. Can I be a bit of a self opinionated arse at times? Yes I can. I'll admit that.
Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:51 pm
Blue_Always wrote: I often think internet anonymity can disinhibit and shine light on a deeper truth within ones human psyché. I've probably whitnessed a side to your character that close work colleagues & friends have not. All the things you describe about being a good person hint at somebody fully at home adhering to rules and structure, seeking the security and certainty of a tried and tested social formula. The epitomy of Asperger's. Barnett it's hard to accept your take on reality as the truth because you can't accept that your past year on here has been up and down with periods of being extremely annoying and offensive.
I'm more proud of the hooligan past than I am of the red roll-over I've witnessed thius past year. Are you?
Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:09 am
BlueWhite&Yellow wrote:Nearly as fickle as some of you lot!
Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:13 am
JB39. wrote:My offering to meet Polo was a joke thread that some just took way too seriously. Polo is one of the few people on this forum who is up for a laugh and doesn't take things too seriously .
.
Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:14 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:JB39. wrote:My offering to meet Polo was a joke thread that some just took way too seriously. Polo is one of the few people on this forum who is up for a laugh and doesn't take things too seriously .
.
Spot on Barney![]()
Probably the best / funniest thread this site has ever seen and likely to see![]()
Not as fun as it used to be
Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:16 pm