Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:11 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:13 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:23 pm
PartyWithOle wrote:64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
You may be right there, how many mins was it added time in the first half?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:23 pm
PartyWithOle wrote:64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
You may be right there, how many mins was it added time in the first half?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:23 pm
caerblue wrote:Who cares
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:31 pm
64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:34 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:37 pm
Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:39 pm
ccfc blue wrote:thanks for putting that up ill be able to sleep tonight now mate
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:41 pm
64JACK wrote:ccfc blue wrote:thanks for putting that up ill be able to sleep tonight now mate
Good for you! Just make sure you log off so that your 'brother' can't post in your name ok!
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:45 pm
64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:51 pm
64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:17 pm
Dan234 wrote:64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
When the board said 4 minuets I was completely overcome with shock. The Sunderland Game had 5 minuets and there wasn’t anyone walking off the pitch, taking ages to take a goal kick and no injuries in that game.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:50 pm
64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:24 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
tippy tappy
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:34 pm
64JACK wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
tippy tappy
You mean tika taka ga. I notice you had 63% possession yesterday but failed to score! It's tough at the top ain't it!
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:42 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:51 pm
Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
tippy tappy
You mean tika taka ga. I notice you had 63% possession yesterday but failed to score! It's tough at the top ain't it!
Yeah,but 10% of that was whilst the hammers lad was laid out on the stretcher.
Anyway, i don't get why we are still on the same points this morning ?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:54 pm
cmorris1927 wrote:The article is from October 2012.. so a bit outdated..
Sun Jan 12, 2014 7:59 pm
Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
tippy tappy
You mean tika taka ga. I notice you had 63% possession yesterday but failed to score! It's tough at the top ain't it!
Yeah,but 10% of that was whilst the hammers lad was laid out on the stretcher.
Anyway, i don't get why we are still on the same points this morning ?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:04 pm
64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:64JACK wrote:Lawnmower wrote:64JACK wrote:caerblue wrote:Who gives a f**k
people who enjoy stats!
For that 10 minutes 4-5 of our players kept the ball, just passing back and forth aimlessly to each other, whilst the West ham players just milled around - now, who did that remind me of![]()
Yeah, I noticed that watching online. I thought at the time that it was nice too see you getting a bit of a treat!
tippy tappy
You mean tika taka ga. I notice you had 63% possession yesterday but failed to score! It's tough at the top ain't it!
Yeah,but 10% of that was whilst the hammers lad was laid out on the stretcher.
Anyway, i don't get why we are still on the same points this morning ?
are we?
Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:45 pm
64JACK wrote:PartyWithOle wrote:64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
You may be right there, how many mins was it added time in the first half?
10 first, 4 second.
Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:07 pm
64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:17 am
Dan234 wrote:64JACK wrote:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/manchester-city-1-0-swansea-match-1291323
12 extra mins added due to injury to Michael Vorm. I'm pretty sure there were 14 mins added yesterday, 10 first half and 4 second?
When the board said 4 minuets I was completely overcome with shock. The Sunderland Game had 5 minuets and there wasn’t anyone walking off the pitch, taking ages to take a goal kick and no injuries in that game.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()