Sun Jan 12, 2014 3:59 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:02 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:02 pm
keith pontin wrote:Can anyone glean this information from the financial statement ?
Is it Hammam, Borley, Guy, etc?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:10 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:12 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:17 pm
wez1927 wrote:Owed to other clubs transfer fees liabilities also the account didn't include Langstone payment that's this year's it's all now owed to tan
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:20 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:22 pm
Lawnmower wrote:wez1927 wrote:Owed to other clubs transfer fees liabilities also the account didn't include Langstone payment that's this year's it's all now owed to tan
There is still £7m owed to Sam, but all the others have been paid off since these accounts, some of the items in the debts are down to accounts anomolies- like they have to show season ticket sales as a debt -as the money has been paid in advance etc..and now it's just the £100m+ (plus a lot) owed to Tan, £7m to Sam to be paid £1m a year with no interest.good news in that we haven't got loads of people after the club's money, bad news that we are still reliant on VTs support.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:25 pm
wez1927 wrote:Lawnmower wrote:wez1927 wrote:Owed to other clubs transfer fees liabilities also the account didn't include Langstone payment that's this year's it's all now owed to tan
There is still £7m owed to Sam, but all the others have been paid off since these accounts, some of the items in the debts are down to accounts anomolies- like they have to show season ticket sales as a debt -as the money has been paid in advance etc..and now it's just the £100m+ (plus a lot) owed to Tan, £7m to Sam to be paid £1m a year with no interest.good news in that we haven't got loads of people after the club's money, bad news that we are still reliant on VTs support.
I'm sure next year's accounts will look 100% better
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:26 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:28 pm
keith pontin wrote:Thanks for the answers.
What is confuses me is that these accounts are a snapshot of June 2013 when the Hammam note had not been agreed. Could the 52 million include this amount as well as the loans owed to Guy and Borley
at the time?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:34 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:36 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:46 pm
BobbyBlue wrote:Will they look better tho if we get relegated?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:47 pm
Forever Blue wrote:keith pontin wrote:Can anyone glean this information from the financial statement ?
Is it Hammam, Borley, Guy, etc?
None of them. All our latest debts have occurred in the last 3 years.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:27 pm
bluecityblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:keith pontin wrote:Can anyone glean this information from the financial statement ?
Is it Hammam, Borley, Guy, etc?
None of them. All our latest debts have occurred in the last 3 years.
I don't get it, how can we rack up over £50m of debt with a billionaire owner? Hamman spent a fortune, not his own money though, the Riddler robbed Peter to pay Paul and now we got a loaded owner yet we still rack up huge debts. Something doesn't add up.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:30 pm
bluecityblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:keith pontin wrote:Can anyone glean this information from the financial statement ?
Is it Hammam, Borley, Guy, etc?
None of them. All our latest debts have occurred in the last 3 years.
I don't get it, how can we rack up over £50m of debt with a billionaire owner? Hamman spent a fortune, not his own money though, the Riddler robbed Peter to pay Paul and now we got a loaded owner yet we still rack up huge debts. Something doesn't add up.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:15 pm
Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:16 pm