Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:40 pm

Improvement on turner or?

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:42 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:Improvement on turner or?

no hes f*cking shit what a f*cking donkey :old:

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:44 pm

GrangeBlue wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:Improvement on turner or?

no hes f*cking shit what a f*cking donkey :old:


Fair enough :lol:

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:46 pm

f**k no worst defensive display and simply cause tyrner wasnt in our side

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:11 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:Improvement on turner or?


Not at all convinced

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:18 pm

Played it into midfield and didnt hoof it like Turner. So on that score an improvement.

Cole was strong though, gave Hudson a tough time.

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:20 pm

Not sure on the partnership, Cole made him look silly at times, calm on the ball though, think Turner's more suited to the PL, would rather we buy a CB, Steven Taylor linked

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:39 pm

PartyWithOle wrote:Not sure on the partnership, Cole made him look silly at times, calm on the ball though, think Turner's more suited to the PL, would rather we buy a CB, Steven Taylor linked


Definelty, Hudson is calmer on the ball than Turner but defensively we were awful today and Hudson got bullied by Cole today it was embarrassing. It was the worst defensive display in awhile and it showed when we missed Turner. We really need a new CB.

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:32 pm

Second half he marked cole and things changed for the better

For all the caulker arse lickers on here , Cole ripped him a new arse first half , just couldn't cope with him, end of !!

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:39 pm

I don't understand how we can say it's the worst defensive display. Their first goal was part of a counter attack, their second was in the 90th min when we were only three at the back, when you do that it's only going to go two ways, you score with the extra striker or your conced as you only really have one defender with the two full backs pressing.
If that was the worst defensive display, people didn't see our game against Southampton... That was the worst I think.
Today, we were just unlucky and not clinical.

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:44 pm

The topic is not about how clinical we were , it's about Hudson !'

I just wish people would stop thinking the sun shines out of Caulkers arse , he was piss poor today !

But, hey! Let's all blame his partner because he didn't cost the money Caulker did!

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:47 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:Improvement on turner or?


both not premiership quality. you need two new CH

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:50 pm

mr moose wrote:I don't understand how we can say it's the worst defensive display. Their first goal was part of a counter attack, their second was in the 90th min when we were only three at the back, when you do that it's only going to go two ways, you score with the extra striker or your conced as you only really have one defender with the two full backs pressing.
If that was the worst defensive display, people didn't see our game against Southampton... That was the worst I think.
Today, we were just unlucky and not clinical.

Their first goal wasnt a counter attack. We had plenty behind the ball.

KTC switched off (again) and Cole got in front of him.

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:51 pm

CjBluebird17 wrote:
PartyWithOle wrote:Not sure on the partnership, Cole made him look silly at times, calm on the ball though, think Turner's more suited to the PL, would rather we buy a CB, Steven Taylor linked


Definelty, Hudson is calmer on the ball than Turner but defensively we were awful today and Hudson got bullied by Cole today it was embarrassing. It was the worst defensive display in awhile and it showed when we missed Turner. We really need a new CB.

Fully agree, Turner is more suited in terms of pace but has made a lot of mistakes lately, Hudson was shown up by an average striker, wish we signed Curtis Davies to go alongside Caulks

Re: Hudson

Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:52 pm

PartyWithOle wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:
PartyWithOle wrote:Not sure on the partnership, Cole made him look silly at times, calm on the ball though, think Turner's more suited to the PL, would rather we buy a CB, Steven Taylor linked


Definelty, Hudson is calmer on the ball than Turner but defensively we were awful today and Hudson got bullied by Cole today it was embarrassing. It was the worst defensive display in awhile and it showed when we missed Turner. We really need a new CB.

Fully agree, Turner is more suited in terms of pace but has made a lot of mistakes lately, Hudson was shown up by an average striker, wish we signed Curtis Davies to go alongside Caulks

How is Caulker innocent in all of this? It wasn't just Hudson that Cole dominated!

Re: Hudson

Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:24 am

We need a new CB. Someone who is comfortable in possession and who is able to bring the ball out of defence. :ayatollah:

Re: Hudson

Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:19 am

mr moose wrote:I don't understand how we can say it's the worst defensive display. Their first goal was part of a counter attack, their second was in the 90th min when we were only three at the back, when you do that it's only going to go two ways, you score with the extra striker or your conced as you only really have one defender with the two full backs pressing.
If that was the worst defensive display, people didn't see our game against Southampton... That was the worst I think.
Today, we were just unlucky and not clinical.


Spot on. They managed 3 shots on target all game

Re: Hudson

Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:32 am

Daya wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:Improvement on turner or?


both not premiership quality. you need two new CH


What and relegation king roger is? :lol:

Re: Hudson

Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:37 am

moonboots wrote:We need a new CB. Someone who is comfortable in possession and who is able to bring the ball out of defence. :ayatollah:

Agreed. If Ole wants to play football then this is a must cos Caulker isnt the best with ball at feet either.