Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:23 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:26 pm
bluebird66 wrote:Anyone else slightly concerned by this? Thought he was very reluctant to discuss the details in press conference.
No great in terms of long term stability !
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:27 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:28 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:28 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:why? be more concerened if he had a long term contract with a stupid pay off is sacked! dont think Tan fancies another £4m pay off if we do go down!
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 pm
CantonG wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:why? be more concerened if he had a long term contract with a stupid pay off is sacked! dont think Tan fancies another £4m pay off if we do go down!
Spot on gd bit of business by Tan
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:51 pm
bluebird66 wrote:CantonG wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:why? be more concerened if he had a long term contract with a stupid pay off is sacked! dont think Tan fancies another £4m pay off if we do go down!
Spot on gd bit of business by Tan
If it was Tans idea!
They were desperate to get him as manager and I would imagine they dangled a huge carrot to secure him, not a rolling contract .
Based on this I believe the rolling contract was his preference!