Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:23 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:25 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:30 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:40 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:33 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:I think its safe to say Malky did not use the summer budget as well as he could have and Tan no doubt thought that was a risk going into January.
Personally I think Malky was taking us down anyway. Ultimately we have to get wins on the board to stay up and Malkys set up to not lose rather than to win the games wouldnt have amassed us enough points IMO.
Its a roll of the dice whichever way you look at it but where Malky struggled was our attacking play and hopefully that is what Solksjaer can bring to the table.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:43 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:I think its safe to say Malky did not use the summer budget as well as he could have and Tan no doubt thought that was a risk going into January.
Personally I think Malky was taking us down anyway. Ultimately we have to get wins on the board to stay up and Malkys set up to not lose rather than to win the games wouldnt have amassed us enough points IMO.
Its a roll of the dice whichever way you look at it but where Malky struggled was our attacking play and hopefully that is what Solksjaer can bring to the table.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:07 pm
CardiffBatman888 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:I think its safe to say Malky did not use the summer budget as well as he could have and Tan no doubt thought that was a risk going into January.
Personally I think Malky was taking us down anyway. Ultimately we have to get wins on the board to stay up and Malkys set up to not lose rather than to win the games wouldnt have amassed us enough points IMO.
Its a roll of the dice whichever way you look at it but where Malky struggled was our attacking play and hopefully that is what Solksjaer can bring to the table.
Yep you going to love OGS then Polo. "i want them to run forward, play forward, that's my brand of style..forward forward..forward passing, forwarding running!"
Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:09 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:11 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:13 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:30 pm
AJ1927 wrote:Or inability to attract big name players?
Does he think (or be advised) that Someone like Ole Gunnar Solskjear will attract bigger named players?
Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:31 pm
soulofthesea wrote:i missed Chelsea,and Fulham, seen the other 7 away............scored 2 f*cking goals, ive seen some shit City sides over the years,but never one as toothless.. we are back on the rollercoaster which is football. win, lose,up or down. real football again.
yippee
Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:33 pm
CardiffBatman888 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:I think its safe to say Malky did not use the summer budget as well as he could have and Tan no doubt thought that was a risk going into January.
Personally I think Malky was taking us down anyway. Ultimately we have to get wins on the board to stay up and Malkys set up to not lose rather than to win the games wouldnt have amassed us enough points IMO.
Its a roll of the dice whichever way you look at it but where Malky struggled was our attacking play and hopefully that is what Solksjaer can bring to the table.
Yep you going to love OGS then Polo. "i want them to run forward, play forward, that's my brand of style..forward forward..forward passing, forwarding running!"
Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:36 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Was Tan Fearful of Malkys Ability..........
Ability to defend every week is all he offered in the prem meaning 99% of the time you go down come may
Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:37 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:I think its safe to say Malky did not use the summer budget as well as he could have and Tan no doubt thought that was a risk going into January.
Personally I think Malky was taking us down anyway. Ultimately we have to get wins on the board to stay up and Malkys set up to not lose rather than to win the games wouldnt have amassed us enough points IMO.
Its a roll of the dice whichever way you look at it but where Malky struggled was our attacking play and hopefully that is what Solksjaer can bring to the table.