Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:14 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:41 pm
stuey1965 wrote:Anyone watching jacks? See his name on shirt jaccanus . That's about right
Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:48 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:11 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:16 pm
PremierJacks wrote:stuey1965 wrote:Anyone watching jacks? See his name on shirt jaccanus . That's about right
Think a trip to Specsavers is in order in the near future for you, you muppet
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:05 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:stuey1965 wrote:Anyone watching jacks? See his name on shirt jaccanus . That's about right
Think a trip to Specsavers is in order in the near future for you, you muppet
Could correct more grammatical errors here.![]()
As for the opening post - as pathetic as Premier Jacks posts.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:07 pm
PremierJacks wrote:So you've been through all my posts looking for grammatical errors?
Weren't you the one who said I couldn't get a bite out of you?
normally, I wouldn't care, but seeing as you made such a meal out of other errors made by some on here, it's only fair to redress the balance. Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:13 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:So you've been through all my posts looking for grammatical errors?
Weren't you the one who said I couldn't get a bite out of you?
No, I read your post & spotted another grammatical error.normally, I wouldn't care, but seeing as you made such a meal out of other errors made by some on here, it's only fair to redress the balance.
![]()
Oh & I've said nothing of the sort.
PS - lucky you getting that thread deleted. You were getting humiliated in it. Hopefully nobody else noticed.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:14 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:So you've been through all my posts looking for grammatical errors?
Weren't you the one who said I couldn't get a bite out of you?
No, I read your post & spotted another grammatical error.normally, I wouldn't care, but seeing as you made such a meal out of other errors made by some on here, it's only fair to redress the balance.
![]()
Oh & I've said nothing of the sort.
PS - lucky you getting that thread deleted. You were getting humiliated in it. Hopefully nobody else noticed.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:15 pm
PremierJacks wrote:
"normally" should have a capital "N" as it follows a full stop. You missed that one!
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:24 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
"normally" should have a capital "N" as it follows a full stop. You missed that one!
Oh dear me.you're still doing that? I'm afraid I couldn't give a shit.
But seeing as you're doing it, normally should have a capital letter at the start of your post.
Having a go at someone for something, then doing exactly the same yourself.![]()
![]()
![]()
The poster that just keep giving.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:26 pm
PremierJacks wrote:
You couldn't give a shit, but then go on to tell me that my post is grammatically incorrect! Couldn't make that up! Brilliant!
By the way, the word "normally" at the start of my post is in quote marks, meaning I'm quoting something verbatim from your post. Therefore, in this instance, the starting of my sentence with a lower case letter is actually correct
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:28 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
You couldn't give a shit, but then go on to tell me that my post is grammatically incorrect! Couldn't make that up! Brilliant!
By the way, the word "normally" at the start of my post is in quote marks, meaning I'm quoting something verbatim from your post. Therefore, in this instance, the starting of my sentence with a lower case letter is actually correct
Only returning the favour. As I said, normally, I don't care.. But when you make such a hypocrite of yourself, I find it quite funny to do so.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:29 pm
PremierJacks wrote:
Apology accepted.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:42 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
Apology accepted.
No apology there or necessary.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 7:46 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:06 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:06 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:Actually, to be pedantic, they are not quote marks! They are in fact quotation marks!
Sorry, but it appears a pedantic discussion.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:10 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:29 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You also under no circumstances can you start a sentence without a capital letter! Sorry, but pedantry seems to be infectious!
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:31 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You also under no circumstances can you start a sentence without a capital letter! Sorry, but pedantry seems to be infectious!
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:34 pm
PremierJacks wrote:Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You also under no circumstances can you start a sentence without a capital letter! Sorry, but pedantry seems to be infectious!
You might also wish to look at your first sentence. You appear to have one too many "you" in it!
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:39 pm
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:39 pm
Bluebird_87 wrote:PremierJacks wrote:Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You also under no circumstances can you start a sentence without a capital letter! Sorry, but pedantry seems to be infectious!
You might also wish to look at your first sentence. You appear to have one too many "you" in it!
You are sad, strange little man.. And you have my pity.
Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:43 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:I agree with the one too many "you's", typing errors can occur! However, are you insistent that you can start a sentence without a capital letter?