VT 'converting loans to equity'

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

Things like this take time not weeks, any business person would know this

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

Things like this take time not weeks, any business person would know this

If daya is to be believed Michael Isaacs holding everything up not selling his shares

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

Things like this take time not weeks, any business person would know this

If daya is to be believed Michael Isaacs holding everything up not selling his shares

This well could be the reason, but lets just all blame Tan as usual ffss

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

He's been stalling, true. The significance of it is he can walk away with his losses at a minimum - and City straight into administration.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

He's been stalling, true. The significance of it is he can walk away with his losses at a minimum - and City straight into administration.

Atleast we would go back to blue then so why moan

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

And in that time he has been buying out shareholders. It's not as if he has been sat around for 18 months, pen in hand. He now has the perfect opportunity to NEVER convert his shares into equity. Let's see if he is a man of his word or just goes down the SH line off holding debt over the club.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

And in that time he has been buying out shareholders. It's not as if he has been sat around for 18 months, pen in hand. He now has the perfect opportunity to NEVER convert his shares into equity. Let's see if he is a man of his word or just goes down the SH line off holding debt over the club.

Spot on, Tan has done so much in a short period of time but its still not enough for some people, you would swear it is the only business he has. Besides changing us to red he has done no wrong in my eyes

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

Like that time he said we'd play in blue last season......

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

Like that time he said we'd play in blue last season......

but the club,trust and supporters at the time went back to him and said they wanted the larger investment for the rebrand remember that he has always kept to his word ,you might not agree with it but always has done

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

Like that time he said we'd play in blue last season......

but the club,trust and supporters at the time went back to him and said they wanted the larger investment for the rebrand remember that he has always kept to his word ,you might not agree with it but always has done

I was a supporter and I did not go back. Infact I was not even asked as a ST.

I question the forensic accountant legits, how this article came ouit and finally how many numbers actually did request the rebrand. Makes me laugh how people say only 2,000 of 27,000 protested Boxing Day but how many of the 18000 STs wrote in asking for the rebrand. I very much doubt it was a higher proportion than those that protested Thursday.

Use the argument to suit the agenda comes to mind.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

Like that time he said we'd play in blue last season......

but the club,trust and supporters at the time went back to him and said they wanted the larger investment for the rebrand remember that he has always kept to his word ,you might not agree with it but always has done

I was a supporter and I did not go back. Infact I was not even asked as a ST.

I question the forensic accountant legits, how this article came ouit and finally how many numbers actually did request the rebrand. Makes me laugh how people say only 2,000 of 27,000 protested Boxing Day but how many of the 18000 STs wrote in asking for the rebrand. I very much doubt it was a higher proportion than those that protested Thursday.

Use the argument to suit the agenda comes to mind.

My agenda is cardiff city winning ? whats yours ? sometimes i think some people want cardiff to fail so they can say the rebrand failed

The timescales are...

In July he said he would proceed after Sam was sorted.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-23362625

Mid-August he said he hoped to complete with in 2 months, but had to deal with the major shareholders first.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ff-5737145

This was completed a few weeks ago.


Apart from the rumoured stalling from Isaacs then all the other things appear to be in place now.

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

For nearly 7 months Tan has stated he will do it and talking about it for 18 months.

annis hes kept his word on everything else wrongly or rightly ,issacs holding out is to blame but even you a few months back agreed with me that you think he will do it or have you changed your mind ?

Like that time he said we'd play in blue last season......

but the club,trust and supporters at the time went back to him and said they wanted the larger investment for the rebrand remember that he has always kept to his word ,you might not agree with it but always has done

I was a supporter and I did not go back. Infact I was not even asked as a ST.

I question the forensic accountant legits, how this article came ouit and finally how many numbers actually did request the rebrand. Makes me laugh how people say only 2,000 of 27,000 protested Boxing Day but how many of the 18000 STs wrote in asking for the rebrand. I very much doubt it was a higher proportion than those that protested Thursday.

Use the argument to suit the agenda comes to mind.

My agenda is cardiff city winning ? whats yours ? sometimes i think some people want cardiff to fail so they can say the rebrand failed

feeling i get as well, i know people who have been very critical of Malky,very critical.........but when it came out Tan wanted him sacked,chose to defend Malky against everything they thought re football,and his management just to be anti Tan..i can not get my head around it...........to support a manager that you have no confidence in just to get at tan...???????????

..didn't quite happen did it ? I'm pretty sure he had every intention of doing so as it would have made financial sense for him and the club in the long run. He sure isn't going to do it now.

Things like this take time not weeks, any business person would know this

If daya is to be believed Michael Isaacs holding everything up not selling his shares

This well could be the reason, but lets just all blame Tan as usual ffss

Poor Tan