IT WAS PERSONAL ALL ALONG

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

Depends on who you believe Jez.

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

Depends on who you believe Jez.

The mail has been very accurate with CCFC this season. Even the ITK brigade said as much.

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

Not really makes sense.
Malky wasted most of his budget so he wouldn't give him any more money. You only have to read the mail article at the top to see the crazy money spent.

A new manager deserves money and to be given a chance to spend money just like Malky was given the chance.

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

You are blinded by your agenda to get Tan out, if the press is to be believed this morning then Tan had every right to be annoyed (as would 99% of business owners would be).

Time to move on now and get behind the team.

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

Depends on who you believe Jez.

The mail has been very accurate with CCFC this season. Even the ITK brigade said as much.

yup the numbers dont lie, tans an idiot about how he goes about things, but his reasoning for them i cant argue with

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

You are blinded by your agenda to get Tan out, if the press is to be believed this morning then Tan had every right to be annoyed (as would 99% of business owners would be).

Time to move on now and get behind the team.

I am always behind the team.Always will be.

Mate have you just read the report in the Mail, now IF and I say IF its true would you not take it personal if someone wasted your money cos I would, I'm not sticking up for Tan but if its true I don't blame tan one bit

Mate have you just read the report in the Mail, now IF and I say IF its true would you not take it personal if someone wasted your money cos I would, I'm not sticking up for Tan but if its true I don't blame tan one bit

Tan had people in place to sign cheques that wasnt MM.
Of course Tan was blameless . Hitler had loads of followers as well. Doesnt mean they were correct.

Mate have you just read the report in the Mail, now IF and I say IF its true would you not take it personal if someone wasted your money cos I would, I'm not sticking up for Tan but if its true I don't blame tan one bit

I usually do'nt believe everything I read in the papers, but have to agree that the Daily Mail have been pretty spot on with stories about us this season.

And you know that do you, like I said and I will say it again IF its true would you take it personel ?

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

The manager he brought to the club and then extended his contract begore paying millions to get rid of. What a strange little man we have in charge of our club.

I did say IF its true cos I don't usually believe whats said in the papers

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

not really, why would tan give a further 25mil to a man who he doesnt want in the club, and doesnt trust with the money the way he spent last time. not rocket science, id do the same

and me.

our fans are blind.
we must be the only team in history to spend 14 million on 4 players in a championship squad and have none of them feature

Todays headline prove that Tan was just being a bitch. "Not a penny In January" changes to £25 Mill. What more proof do we need.
TAN OUT

obvious or at least i thought so............who keeps giving a manager money when you think he wastes it...........far from personal re january cash,,,,,,,,,,,,