Malky in Malky out. Tan in Tan out!?

I've got to be honest - I'm totally bemused by some of the postings on here. Going on today's performance as an example, if you'd pumped more than £100 million into this club would you be happy? I certainly wouldn't be! However, one poor performance doesn't deserve someone being sacked does it? But is this the only poor performance? No chance. I remember lots of people on here saying they'd be happy finishing 17th at the end of the season only to change their mind and even go so far as to mention top ten when we signed some 'quality' players. Are we playing anything like a top ten club? No chance. So who's to blame? Is it the man who has funded these 'quality' signings? Is it the man who is paid to pick the team, coach the players etc? At the end of the day there are some influential posters on this board - we all know who they are. These are the ones who whatever chairman we have - apart from Scam Hammam - will stir up trouble. There are too many 'sheep' who are brainwashed by these influential people and listen to their every word. Fair play, changing from blue to red and from a decent badge to a beer mat badge was a bad decision but should they really be making up other stories to force out the man who made these decisions. What is this Tan out business? Where does the money come from if he gets pushed out? Some say that someone rich could buy him out. Would you buy into this club when you have a bunch of stirring fans intent on causing trouble for your business? As far as I can see, Malky has to go - his players are not playing for him. His style of play is too negative. He is stubborn. The list goes on. Tan must stay. This club has made massive strides since he has been here even though he has made the blue to red mistake.
It could of course be better. Sam Hammam as chairman, Annis Abraham as Chief Executive, Carl Curtis as manager!

I've got to be honest - I'm totally bemused by some of the postings on here. Going on today's performance as an example, if you'd pumped more than £100 million into this club would you be happy? I certainly wouldn't be! However, one poor performance doesn't deserve someone being sacked does it? But is this the only poor performance? No chance. I remember lots of people on here saying they'd be happy finishing 17th at the end of the season only to change their mind and even go so far as to mention top ten when we signed some 'quality' players. Are we playing anything like a top ten club? No chance. So who's to blame? Is it the man who has funded these 'quality' signings? Is it the man who is paid to pick the team, coach the players etc? At the end of the day there are some influential posters on this board - we all know who they are. These are the ones who whatever chairman we have - apart from Scam Hammam - will stir up trouble. There are too many 'sheep' who are brainwashed by these influential people and listen to their every word. Fair play, changing from blue to red and from a decent badge to a beer mat badge was a bad decision but should they really be making up other stories to force out the man who made these decisions. What is this Tan out business? Where does the money come from if he gets pushed out? Some say that someone rich could buy him out. Would you buy into this club when you have a bunch of stirring fans intent on causing trouble for your business? As far as I can see, Malky has to go - his players are not playing for him. His style of play is too negative. He is stubborn. The list goes on. Tan must stay. This club has made massive strides since he has been here even though he has made the blue to red mistake.
It could of course be better. Sam Hammam as chairman, Annis Abraham as Chief Executive, Carl Curtis as manager!

would you trust the chairman and CEO,to not pass the manager notes though?

Totally agree with the OP. I read this forum regularly and rarely post but the OP is spot on. For me Tan has made two mistakes - changing our colours which I will tolerate but never accept. The second was letting that snake scam hamman anywhere near our club, for me the "influential" posters on here have an agenda which most fans disagree with. I will continue to believe that until I go to a game and hear the fans around me say otherwise. Until Saturday I was with malky but since then VT has given some ground and since that Malky has tried his best to get himself sacked, he won't give a f**k about us when he's got his 2m and a new job.

Time to wake up bluebirds!

Totally agree with the OP. I read this forum regularly and rarely post but the OP is spot on. For me Tan has made two mistakes - changing our colours which I will tolerate but never accept. The second was letting that snake scam hamman anywhere near our club, for me the "influential" posters on here have an agenda which most fans disagree with. I will continue to believe that until I go to a game and hear the fans around me say otherwise. Until Saturday I was with malky but since then VT has given some ground and since that Malky has tried his best to get himself sacked, he won't give a f**k about us when he's got his 2m and a new job.

Time to wake up bluebirds!

You do the hokey cokey and you turn around,
That's what it's all about.

WOOOOAAAAHHH, the Hokey Cokey!

etc,etc

I've got to be honest - I'm totally bemused by some of the postings on here. Going on today's performance as an example, if you'd pumped more than £100 million into this club would you be happy? I certainly wouldn't be! However, one poor performance doesn't deserve someone being sacked does it? But is this the only poor performance? No chance. I remember lots of people on here saying they'd be happy finishing 17th at the end of the season only to change their mind and even go so far as to mention top ten when we signed some 'quality' players. Are we playing anything like a top ten club? No chance. So who's to blame? Is it the man who has funded these 'quality' signings? Is it the man who is paid to pick the team, coach the players etc? At the end of the day there are some influential posters on this board - we all know who they are. These are the ones who whatever chairman we have - apart from Scam Hammam - will stir up trouble. There are too many 'sheep' who are brainwashed by these influential people and listen to their every word. Fair play, changing from blue to red and from a decent badge to a beer mat badge was a bad decision but should they really be making up other stories to force out the man who made these decisions. What is this Tan out business? Where does the money come from if he gets pushed out? Some say that someone rich could buy him out. Would you buy into this club when you have a bunch of stirring fans intent on causing trouble for your business? As far as I can see, Malky has to go - his players are not playing for him. His style of play is too negative. He is stubborn. The list goes on. Tan must stay. This club has made massive strides since he has been here even though he has made the blue to red mistake.
It could of course be better. Sam Hammam as chairman, Annis Abraham as Chief Executive, Carl Curtis as manager!

i am sure a billionaire business man knows when he has made a mistake.....{ colour } a look around our ground is enough,but i doubt he will back away from the challenges people throw at him....tan out malky in......really..does that mean malky for owner or what?..i bet he wished he had tans cash eh........i wonder what club HE might invest it in