Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:07 pm

just to get his point across!!!

For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark.

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:10 pm

I know i wasn't there but I always thought Southampton would put a few past us, pochettino or how you spell it, is doing a cracking job at the Saints.

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:11 pm

Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.
Last edited by CraigCCFC on Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:12 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I know i wasn't there but I always thought Southampton would put a few past us, pochettino or how you spell it, is doing a cracking job at the Saints.


Just because they aren't a fashionable team make no mistakes Southampton aren't no mugs

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:13 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?

Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:14 pm

Military Junta wrote:just to get his point across!!!

For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark.

Your a f*cking clown!

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:15 pm

cityprem2013 wrote:
Military Junta wrote:just to get his point across!!!

For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark.

Your a f*cking clown!


and you are a c**t but I'm not complaining!!!

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:15 pm

Military Junta wrote:just to get his point across!!!

For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark.


Over the years you have spouted some sh*t on this site, but this statement must go down as your most ridiculous yet. :lol:

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:15 pm

Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?

Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:18 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?

Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell


No he didn't and others have stated it too on here!! Even the f*cking commentators were saying he was playing 4-4-2 FFS!!!! What game were you watching!!!

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:21 pm

Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?
Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell


No he didn't and others have stated it too on here!! Even the f*cking commentators were saying he was playing 4-4-2 FFS!!!! What game were you watching!!!

How did you watch it?? On a boycott arent you??

He did not play a straight 442.

It was 4-2-31........4-4-1-1 at best.

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:23 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?
Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell


No he didn't and others have stated it too on here!! Even the f*cking commentators were saying he was playing 4-4-2 FFS!!!! What game were you watching!!!

How did you watch it?? On a boycott arent you??

He did not play a straight 442.

It was 4-2-31........4-4-1-1 at best.


Maybe the fact that I stated that the commentators were even saying that it was 4-4-2 then I would have thought that it would have given you a clue FFS!!!! :lol:

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:24 pm

Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?
Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell


No he didn't and others have stated it too on here!! Even the f*cking commentators were saying he was playing 4-4-2 FFS!!!! What game were you watching!!!

How did you watch it?? On a boycott arent you??

He did not play a straight 442.

It was 4-2-31........4-4-1-1 at best.


Maybe the fact that I stated that the commentators were even saying that it was 4-4-2 then I would have thought that it would have given you a clue FFS!!!! :lol:


so you didnt watch the game. Thanks.

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:26 pm

Did he arrange a secret meeting with the players that don't talk to him? They've asked that he doesn't enter the dressing room, or training facilities - due to the fact that he didn't want to pay bonuses at a consistent rate to younger squad members.

Is it seriously being suggested that Vincent Tan would rather match fix, instead of simply sacking Mackay; and in-turn go back on his previously held view that current salaries being paid were enough.

Yeah, why not? Pay your employees more to underachieve. That's a valuable life lesson right there.

Not one logical thought crossed your mind before you posted that muck did it?

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:31 pm

Military Junta wrote:
cityprem2013 wrote:
Military Junta wrote:just to get his point across!!!

For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark.

Your a f*cking clown!


and you are a c**t but I'm not complaining!!!


Haha! Spat coffee everywhere after that, so you too browny are a c**t!

On topic nothing surprises me with suntan,but this is your most bonkers assumption ever!

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:33 pm

can people read my original comment again FFS!!! 'For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark' :lol:

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:37 pm

Military Junta wrote:can people read my original comment again FFS!!! 'For ALL the players to put in a below-par performance then something isn't right even if my idea is way off the mark' :lol:


Ofcourse something isn't right ffs, the owner and manager are having a row which has gone public and has effected the players!

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:39 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Military Junta wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Ive heard some crap off you Brownie but that is utterly ridiculous.

You are right about something not being right.....its Malkys tactics.


What the same change of tactics many on here were crying out for..? 4-4-2..?
Please note Craig that I did say 'way off the mark' too


he played 4-2-3-1

Odemwingie played just off Campbell


No he didn't and others have stated it too on here!! Even the f*cking commentators were saying he was playing 4-4-2 FFS!!!! What game were you watching!!!

How did you watch it?? On a boycott arent you??

He did not play a straight 442.

It was 4-2-31........4-4-1-1 at best.


Maybe the fact that I stated that the commentators were even saying that it was 4-4-2 then I would have thought that it would have given you a clue FFS!!!! :lol:


so you didnt watch the game. Thanks.


yes I did thanks

Re: I wouldn't put it past Tan to pay the players to lose!!!

Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:40 pm

Hey Adam maybe Malky knows he's going to WBA or WHU so he got us to lose as they will be in the relegation dogfight with us. :lol: