Thu Dec 26, 2013 7:21 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 7:45 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 7:54 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:13 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:15 am
CraigCCFC wrote:That bandwagon is getting awfully full
Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:21 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:That bandwagon is getting awfully full
Surely people are entitled to their opinions & if people have had enough of Tan's nonsense, they can do so.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:24 am
CraigCCFC wrote:never said otherwise. No issue with the protest.
its just sad to see people care more about a 2.5 year long management figure than a 100yr part of CCFC tradition.
gotta love the people ramping it up. Coming to the forefront when they think there might be some success yet have basically done jack shit for 18months.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:34 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:10 am
CraigCCFC wrote:I think this protest is the final nail in Malky's coffin.
Tan will see this as a pro malky protest as there hasnt been anything for 18 months concerning the rebrand apart from 100 people on BU marches. Tan will see Malky as a problem and remove the threat to his business.
If there was any hope for Malky then this has finished it.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:13 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:21 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:48 am
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:53 am
Nuclearblue wrote:I think Malky's heart is now wanting the West Ham job. He knows his relationship with dictator Tan is broken beyond repair but its a simple case of a battle of wills over a massive amount of money. Who gets it Malky or Tan.
But in the mean time its the club that gets damaged. Tan has made us a laughing stock with ghe rebrand and now with this.
I wish Malky good luck as how can he stay now ? Saying we have a right to protest is a clever move in there game of chess.
Lets be honest here if it wasnt for the compo Malky would of resigned by now or Tan would of sacked him.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:57 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:
It's funny - the Tan apologists are willing to believe every word that comes out of his mouth about debt to equity etc... But as soon as this is mentioned, they go quiet.
Doesn't suit their agenda to believe it I guess.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 10:07 am
Daya wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:I think Malky's heart is now wanting the West Ham job. He knows his relationship with dictator Tan is broken beyond repair but its a simple case of a battle of wills over a massive amount of money. Who gets it Malky or Tan.
But in the mean time its the club that gets damaged. Tan has made us a laughing stock with ghe rebrand and now with this.
I wish Malky good luck as how can he stay now ? Saying we have a right to protest is a clever move in there game of chess.
Lets be honest here if it wasnt for the compo Malky would of resigned by now or Tan would of sacked him.
the big question is though Nukes can the real fans have enough in them to pull off this demo???
Real fans will be there no doubt but aren't the majority newbie soul sellers or U turners at the the flick of the switch?
Lets be honest weve seen fans before as die hards stood at the gates in mug and bigger mug t shirts on a Friday afternoon and then soon covering them up and drinking cocktails down the bay a few hours later on the flick of a u turn switch.
Thu Dec 26, 2013 10:15 am
pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:
It's funny - the Tan apologists are willing to believe every word that comes out of his mouth about debt to equity etc... But as soon as this is mentioned, they go quiet.
Doesn't suit their agenda to believe it I guess.
So you believe tan won't swap debt to equity? And what is a tan apologist? Is that the same as malky apologist? ?? Just wondered.
I don't trust him at all. People like you are Tan apologists, the ones who wouldn't dream of criticising their beloved leader.