Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:34 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:45 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:50 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:people went along with the rebrand for the survival of the club, as Tan threatened to pull out (which we now know was a bluff), and for the club to move forward! Tan's treatment of Malky is making our club look like a laughing stock as it shows he hasn't a clue! if he wanted to sack Malky, fine its his choice, but go about it the right way, not make up nonsense about MM and make threats just so save a few quid!
we're in the premier league now, we're in a far better and attractive position for others to buy the club if Tan wants to pack up and leave! that's why it's time for protest now, not then, as the club is in a better position incase the dictator packs up cos he isn't getting his own way!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:01 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:12 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:32 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:people went along with the rebrand for the survival of the club, as Tan threatened to pull out (which we now know was a bluff), and for the club to move forward! Tan's treatment of Malky is making our club look like a laughing stock as it shows he hasn't a clue! if he wanted to sack Malky, fine its his choice, but go about it the right way, not make up nonsense about MM and make threats just so save a few quid!
we're in the premier league now, we're in a far better and attractive position for others to buy the club if Tan wants to pack up and leave! that's why it's time for protest now, not then, as the club is in a better position incase the dictator packs up cos he isn't getting his own way!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:54 pm
Jinks wrote:How come nobody else protested against the rebrand or scarfgate?
Why is it only now that posters on this board are trying to drum up support for a protest?
Some say because Tan's treatment of malky is the final straw so is malky more important than the rebrand?
Wasn't the rebrand alone not worth a protest?
What was stopping you until now??
![]()
Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:54 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Cos their hypocrites.
Sold out for 100 pieces of silver and the lure of the Premiership. f**k all to do with the club being "saved" as some are
now claiming.
Tan was already in too deep and we had been "saved" some 2 years previous.
Sickening the way some are banging on about this now over a manager whos been there 2.5 years yet didnt want the fight for 100 years of our identity.
Also no coincidence Sams been paid up and certain people now want to protest.
Hmmmmmm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:26 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:people went along with the rebrand for the survival of the club, as Tan threatened to pull out (which we now know was a bluff), and for the club to move forward! Tan's treatment of Malky is making our club look like a laughing stock as it shows he hasn't a clue! if he wanted to sack Malky, fine its his choice, but go about it the right way, not make up nonsense about MM and make threats just so save a few quid!
we're in the premier league now, we're in a far better and attractive position for others to buy the club if Tan wants to pack up and leave! that's why it's time for protest now, not then, as the club is in a better position incase the dictator packs up cos he isn't getting his own way!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:32 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 8:40 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Cos their hypocrites.
Sold out for 100 pieces of silver and the lure of the Premiership. f**k all to do with the club being "saved" as some are
now claiming.
Tan was already in too deep and we had been "saved" some 2 years previous.
Sickening the way some are banging on about this now over a manager whos been there 2.5 years yet didnt want the fight for 100 years of our identity.
Also no coincidence Sams been paid up and certain people now want to protest.
Hmmmmmm