Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:17 pm
Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:16 pm
Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:16 pm
Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:58 am
CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:36 am
Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:54 am
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:22 am
sloper_road_legend wrote:Nothing would surprise me however unlikely.
Although I do believe tan is deliberately playing games with malky
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:33 am
CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:40 am
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:42 am
Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:49 am
Military Junta wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Just mentioning what others like Craig have stated yet they are now in denial!!! and you say that I twist things to suit my own agenda!!! FFS!!!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:52 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Military Junta wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Just mentioning what others like Craig have stated yet they are now in denial!!! and you say that I twist things to suit my own agenda!!! FFS!!!
Tell me Adam do you really understand things?
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:52 am
Military Junta wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Just mentioning what others like Craig have stated yet they are now in denial!!! and you say that I twist things to suit my own agenda!!! FFS!!!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:58 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Just mentioning what others like Craig have stated yet they are now in denial!!! and you say that I twist things to suit my own agenda!!! FFS!!!
Do you have a brain?
You said SSN said there is now no meeting on friday.
i said that the SSN segment you referred to doesnt even mention anything about Friday (one way or another)
Dalman told the press at Anfield the meeting was being arranged for Friday.
I have not supported Tan over his handling of this. Claiming I have is about as accurate as you claiming to be a city fan.
not rocket science brownie
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:02 am
Military Junta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:They didnt even mention friday lol
Adam is very much like Gwyn. He twists things to suit his own agenda.
Just mentioning what others like Craig have stated yet they are now in denial!!! and you say that I twist things to suit my own agenda!!! FFS!!!
Do you have a brain?
You said SSN said there is now no meeting on friday.
i said that the SSN segment you referred to doesnt even mention anything about Friday (one way or another)
Dalman told the press at Anfield the meeting was being arranged for Friday.
SSN didnt mention anything of the sort last night. They just said Malky wants to meet the owner hopefully by the end of the week.
typical spin coming from a politician.
only time I defend Tan is when inaccuracies are posted. Critisize about his rebrand, his lack of football knowledge (marshall story is clearly bollox btw) and for his disgusting handling of the Malky situation I agree, no need to critisize anybody based on untruths and I would do the same regarding anybody.
I have not supported Tan over his handling of this. Claiming I have is about as accurate as you claiming to be a city fan.
not rocket science brownie
SSN were claiming a 'possible' meeting next week which in my understanding is after Friday which is what Dalman stated. So now the Friday meeting is not happening!!!! Is that so difficult to understand..?
And people are claiming that I am trying to twist information FFS!!!
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:07 am
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:12 am
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:14 am
Military Junta wrote:You have been supporting Malky getting sacked. It may not be the way you would like but you are still supporting the removal of Malky. The only people who think this are clearly Tan supporters and you fall into that catagory in my book.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:18 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:You have been supporting Malky getting sacked. It may not be the way you would like but you are still supporting the removal of Malky. The only people who think this are clearly Tan supporters and you fall into that catagory in my book.
i support the sacking of Malky yes, on pure footballing reasons. I did not however, want it done in this ridiculous way.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:35 am
Military Junta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:You have been supporting Malky getting sacked. It may not be the way you would like but you are still supporting the removal of Malky. The only people who think this are clearly Tan supporters and you fall into that catagory in my book.
i support the sacking of Malky yes, on pure footballing reasons. I did not however, want it done in this ridiculous way.
i believe his ultra defensive style against teams around us will take us down, his substitutions are baffling to say the least and his dealings in the transfer window are questionable If he changed his style I might change my mind.
As Polo said, pro active rather than reactive!
What do you expect other managers to say when asked "yeah hes a bit defensive and crap really"
they said sacking Adkins was an awful decision.....look how that turned out!
Did I say that you did..? The same footballing reasons why the vast majority of the footballing world say that he's done and still doing a fantastic job for the club!!! Its a results business and there no 'head judge called Len' in the stand marking their performance!!! The target was always to survive and we are doing that so whats your problem..?
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:41 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Military Junta wrote:You have been supporting Malky getting sacked. It may not be the way you would like but you are still supporting the removal of Malky. The only people who think this are clearly Tan supporters and you fall into that catagory in my book.
i support the sacking of Malky yes, on pure footballing reasons. I did not however, want it done in this ridiculous way.
i believe his ultra defensive style against teams around us will take us down, his substitutions are baffling to say the least and his dealings in the transfer window are questionable If he changed his style I might change my mind.
As Polo said, pro active rather than reactive!
What do you expect other managers to say when asked "yeah hes a bit defensive and crap really"
they said sacking Adkins was an awful decision.....look how that turned out!
Did I say that you did..? The same footballing reasons why the vast majority of the footballing world say that he's done and still doing a fantastic job for the club!!! Its a results business and there no 'head judge called Len' in the stand marking their performance!!! The target was always to survive and we are doing that so whats your problem..?
Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:40 pm
Magners wrote:Off with his head.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:37 pm
.. 20 point would have been our halfway target.
Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:57 pm