A forum for all things Cardiff City
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:35 pm
Sue the BBC? What if and mean if, the have made a story up. There was no quotes and not the first time they would have done it. we all know there is things going on behind the scenes but I don't for one moment believe this story. That's me personally.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:42 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:Sue the BBC? What if and mean if, the have made a story up. There was no quotes and not the first time they would have done it. we all know there is things going on behind the scenes but I don't for one moment believe this story. That's me personally.
the bbc have back tracked and said it was a letter and not an email now ,i wonder if its duff information ? they also ran the story that malky had been asked to resign after the moody sacking which was a lie confirmed by malky himself ,who knows whats going on ,only the board and malky know whats happening the rest is spin
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:44 pm
I'd sue them. They've caused massive issues today.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:49 pm
Nothing to sue for.
Just for Malky to sue Tan.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:52 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Nothing to sue for.
Just for Malky to sue Tan.
do you know 100% for sure that an email was sent to malky from tan this week or is it an recycled story from the moody saga
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:55 pm
Well the BBC have caused major issues today. And possibly could be false. This could potential cause loss of earnings due to club shop and people refusing too watch them. If it is false I'd sue.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:59 pm
Also sky changing wording on its reports if you notice! ! Something odd going on.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:00 pm
Yes the club should sue without a doubt.
An organisation like the bbc can't spread story's unless there true.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:01 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Also sky changing wording on its reports if you notice! ! Something odd going on.
seems people have jumped the gun again and attacked tan before getting all the facts
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:06 pm
It all sounds like the moody afair all over again ,I wonder if by Monday the club makes a statement saying they are all behind malky
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:12 pm
Sky have claimed to have seen the evidence.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:19 pm
Daya wrote:Sky have claimed to have seen the evidence.
How did they get that ? I wonder if malky has leaked it ,I know tan or club wouldn't if it's true
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:20 pm
Daya wrote:Sky have claimed to have seen the evidence.
Surely claiming is not same as saying they have seen letter/mail? Like said they have changed tone of reports.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:21 pm
The email is 100% true, so nothing to sue.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:23 pm
Judging by the Brendan Rogers interview and his take on the situation, I think it's fair to say the email was sent and I would also go so far as to say that Rogers has actually seen it !!
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:25 pm
Forever Blue wrote:The email is 100% true, so nothing to sue.
First time I've said this, but I hope your wrong.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:33 pm
wez1927 wrote:Daya wrote:Sky have claimed to have seen the evidence.
How did they get that ? I wonder if malky has leaked it ,I know tan or club wouldn't if it's true
i hope its from that jack tw*t at anfield and ebveryone sues him tbh........fair play to brenda and all
Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:59 pm
One of two people leaked the letter, I doubt it was Tan.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:00 pm
bluebird66 wrote:Judging by the Brendan Rogers interview and his take on the situation, I think it's fair to say the email was sent and I would also go so far as to say that Rogers has actually seen it !!
That's why I believed he was talking to the city fans more than anybody else in that interview. I would say its beyond doubt that he has seen it and was speaking Malky's words as he knew Malky couldn't say anything himself.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:21 pm
2blue2handle wrote:One of two people leaked the letter, I doubt it was Tan.
Simon Lim I would put my money on if I was a gambling man.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:28 pm
carlccfc wrote:2blue2handle wrote:One of two people leaked the letter, I doubt it was Tan.
Simon Lim I would put my money on if I was a gambling man.
The guys a snake
Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:38 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebird66 wrote:Judging by the Brendan Rogers interview and his take on the situation, I think it's fair to say the email was sent and I would also go so far as to say that Rogers has actually seen it !!
That's why I believed he was talking to the city fans more than anybody else in that interview. I would say its beyond doubt that he has seen it and was speaking Malky's words as he knew Malky couldn't say anything himself.
During the interview Rogers appears to be very careful in what he's saying and almost pauses at times to ensure he doesn't drop anyone in the shit .
I'd put money on it that he's seen the email .
Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:19 pm
bluebird66 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebird66 wrote:Judging by the Brendan Rogers interview and his take on the situation, I think it's fair to say the email was sent and I would also go so far as to say that Rogers has actually seen it !!
That's why I believed he was talking to the city fans more than anybody else in that interview. I would say its beyond doubt that he has seen it and was speaking Malky's words as he knew Malky couldn't say anything himself.
During the interview Rogers appears to be very careful in what he's saying and almost pauses at times to ensure he doesn't drop anyone in the shit .
I'd put money on it that he's seen the email .
I agree - he couldn't have said what he said and with such venom if he wasn't 100% in the know. I also agree that it is probably Lim that has released all of the correspondence to the press.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:22 pm
If the email is true then they have nothing to hide and should reveal. Simple.
Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:28 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Also sky changing wording on its reports if you notice! ! Something odd going on.
Something odd going on.........understatement of 2013

Only the oddities are all curtesy of your friend vt, not sky or the bbc.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.