Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:32 am

Seeing as you didnt respond to my reply on the other thread can I have your thoughts on this article please.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400

You claim that Velonijka was a Malaysian signing ?

Yet Malky says he tracked him at Watford. And I quote:

“I almost took him to Watford, but the move broke down,” said the City boss.

“We have keenly followed his progress since then with interest and I am delighted he is joining our squad.

“He is a goalscorer who has played international football for his country and another talented young player with genuine potential.

“We are really excited to be bringing in an international striker. We thought the time was right to bring him to the UK and I’m looking forward to seeing his career continue to develop with Cardiff City.”


That does not sound like a player that was "forced" onto Malky. Not one bit.

I also recall when Kim wasnt getting a look in he was another "signed by the Malaysians for the Asian market".

Will Cornelius be the next flop "blamed" on the Malaysians?
Hmmmmmmmmm

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:38 am

Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:48 am

wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:59 am

I don't see how anyone can argue that he wasn't a Malky signing after seeing those direct quotes.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:07 am

Gonzo wrote:I don't see how anyone can argue that he wasn't a Malky signing after seeing those direct quotes.


Sadly Gonz, when it comes to apologising Malky, the truth matters very little.

It was only 2 weeks ago the shambolic performance at Palace was being blamed on a sickness bug in the camp, which MM said himself was nonsense.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:27 am

People don't want to read negative Malky news.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:14 pm

The problem being with getting inside info is the person your getting it from is probably only passing on info they've picked up. Now that's not so bad if they are neutral, but if they are biased one way or the other then they are probably interpreting it the way they want to. I feel that what Malky was saying on MOTD was interpreted to only take the phrase he would like 3 more players out of his statement because that was what was passed on to Tan leaving out the bit about talking to the chairman and seeing what could be done. Unfortunately this happens so often nowadays in the press and seems to be used as standard for nearly everybody. I seem to remember someone posting on this board quite a while ago about hearing that there would be no funds available in Jan as the budget had been spent in the summer, so it didn't come as any surprise to me and seems to have been decided long before this latest rumpas.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:58 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:11 pm

Karl wrote:People don't want to read negative Malky news.


I think if he is a Malaysian signing it put Malky in a worse light.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:22 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

thats bollocks mate malky wanted him at watford end off really ;)

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:28 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:Seeing as you didnt respond to my reply on the other thread can I have your thoughts on this article please.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400

You claim that Velonijka was a Malaysian signing ?

Yet Malky says he tracked him at Watford. And I quote:

“I almost took him to Watford, but the move broke down,” said the City boss.

“We have keenly followed his progress since then with interest and I am delighted he is joining our squad.

“He is a goalscorer who has played international football for his country and another talented young player with genuine potential.

“We are really excited to be bringing in an international striker. We thought the time was right to bring him to the UK and I’m looking forward to seeing his career continue to develop with Cardiff City.”


That does not sound like a player that was "forced" onto Malky. Not one bit.

I also recall when Kim wasnt getting a look in he was another "signed by the Malaysians for the Asian market".

Will Cornelius be the next flop "blamed" on the Malaysians?
Hmmmmmmmmm



Chris,

That link,post does not lie and it states Malky saying he that he almost took him to Watford, but it broke down, So yes he is a Malky signing and u proved me 100% wrong :thumbup:
But I stand by the Earnshaw signing no matter what Wez says :thumbup:

Chris
Also the difference between myself and u and a couple of others is, I will own up if I got it wrong, the sickness bug only Declan had it, I owned up, but in the same topic, I said it was lies about Bellamy on the coach which Malky confirmd, if I get one thing wrong out of 20, u will keep reminding me :lol: :lol:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:30 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Seeing as you didnt respond to my reply on the other thread can I have your thoughts on this article please.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400

You claim that Velonijka was a Malaysian signing ?

Yet Malky says he tracked him at Watford. And I quote:

“I almost took him to Watford, but the move broke down,” said the City boss.

“We have keenly followed his progress since then with interest and I am delighted he is joining our squad.

“He is a goalscorer who has played international football for his country and another talented young player with genuine potential.

“We are really excited to be bringing in an international striker. We thought the time was right to bring him to the UK and I’m looking forward to seeing his career continue to develop with Cardiff City.”


That does not sound like a player that was "forced" onto Malky. Not one bit.

I also recall when Kim wasnt getting a look in he was another "signed by the Malaysians for the Asian market".

Will Cornelius be the next flop "blamed" on the Malaysians?
Hmmmmmmmmm



Chris,

That link,post does not lie and it states Malky saying he that he almost took him to Watford, but it broke down, So yes he is a Malky signing and u proved me 100% wrong :thumbup:
But I stand by the Earnshaw signing no matter what Wez says :thumbup:


Chris
Also the difference between myself and u and a couple of others is, I will own up if I got it wrong, the sickness bug only Declan had it, I owned up, but in the same topic, I said it was lies about Bellamy on the coach which Malky confirmd, if I get one thing wrong out of 20, u will keep reminding me :lol: :lol:


earnshaw was before malky was appointed wasnt he annis or was in the pipeline ?

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:34 pm

wez1927 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Seeing as you didnt respond to my reply on the other thread can I have your thoughts on this article please.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ay-2027400

You claim that Velonijka was a Malaysian signing ?

Yet Malky says he tracked him at Watford. And I quote:

“I almost took him to Watford, but the move broke down,” said the City boss.

“We have keenly followed his progress since then with interest and I am delighted he is joining our squad.

“He is a goalscorer who has played international football for his country and another talented young player with genuine potential.

“We are really excited to be bringing in an international striker. We thought the time was right to bring him to the UK and I’m looking forward to seeing his career continue to develop with Cardiff City.”


That does not sound like a player that was "forced" onto Malky. Not one bit.

I also recall when Kim wasnt getting a look in he was another "signed by the Malaysians for the Asian market".

Will Cornelius be the next flop "blamed" on the Malaysians?
Hmmmmmmmmm



Chris,

That link,post does not lie and it states Malky saying he that he almost took him to Watford, but it broke down, So yes he is a Malky signing and u proved me 100% wrong :thumbup:
But I stand by the Earnshaw signing no matter what Wez says :thumbup:

earnshaw was before malky was appointed wasnt he annis or was in the pipeline ?


Chris
Also the difference between myself and u and a couple of others is, I will own up if I got it wrong, the sickness bug only Declan had it, I owned up, but in the same topic, I said it was lies about Bellamy on the coach which Malky confirmd, if I get one thing wrong out of 20, u will keep reminding me :lol: :lol:



Wez
The deal for Earnshaw was set up before Malky became our manager. :thumbup:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:39 pm

steve davies wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.


more rubbish...
if he was a tan signing { one of many}..and tan interferes in team selection,how come he doesnt even get a squad number?
if it was a MOURINHO recommended signing...we are to believe Mourinho doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....a player not good enough for a championship bench?
and most of all..why has Tan not insisted the boy go elsewhere on loan to make a point..i know i would if whats being said was true and i was the dictator.
Malky could buy a Kalesnikoff and drive around Cardiff killing people ,and there would be some people on here saying it was Tan wearing a Malky mask..ffs

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:44 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.


more rubbish...
if he was a tan signing { one of many}..and tan interferes in team selection,how come he doesnt even get a squad number?
if it was a MOURINHO recommended signing...we are to believe Mourinho doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....a player not good enough for a championship bench?
and most of all..why has Tan not insisted the boy go elsewhere on loan to make a point..i know i would if whats being said was true and i was the dictator.
Malky could buy a Kalesnikoff and drive around Cardiff killing people ,and there would be some people on here saying it was Tan wearing a Malky mask..ffs

spot on :thumbup:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:07 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
Gonzo wrote:I don't see how anyone can argue that he wasn't a Malky signing after seeing those direct quotes.


Sadly Gonz, when it comes to apologising Malky, the truth matters very little.

It was only 2 weeks ago the shambolic performance at Palace was being blamed on a sickness bug in the camp, which MM said himself was nonsense.


The same pair who gave Gestede a new contract, gave Lappin a contract, gave McNaughton another two years etc etc. No wonder VT's reluctant to give them any more money in January. In saying that, the indespensible Moody has now been removed, so maybe they will be a litte less frivilous with the owners money :lol:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:18 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.


more rubbish...
if he was a tan signing { one of many}..and tan interferes in team selection,how come he doesnt even get a squad number?
if it was a MOURINHO recommended signing...we are to believe Mourinho doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....a player not good enough for a championship bench?
and most of all..why has Tan not insisted the boy go elsewhere on loan to make a point..i know i would if whats being said was true and i was the dictator.
Malky could buy a Kalesnikoff and drive around Cardiff killing people ,and there would be some people on here saying it was Tan wearing a Malky mask..ffs

We shall have to see when the dust settles when malkys gone then as for your comment about mourinho and strikers his records exceptional this year :roll: sends a quality striker who scored goals in the premiership last season back out on loan and keeps the premierships biggest dud signing in Torres and signs the newest dud in eto. Oh year great with strikers mourinho is :lol:
Going back to Malky did you really expect him to come out and humiliate tan in public over velinkonja.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:27 pm

steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.


more rubbish...
if he was a tan signing { one of many}..and tan interferes in team selection,how come he doesnt even get a squad number?
if it was a MOURINHO recommended signing...we are to believe Mourinho doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....a player not good enough for a championship bench?
and most of all..why has Tan not insisted the boy go elsewhere on loan to make a point..i know i would if whats being said was true and i was the dictator.
Malky could buy a Kalesnikoff and drive around Cardiff killing people ,and there would be some people on here saying it was Tan wearing a Malky mask..ffs

We shall have to see when the dust settles when malkys gone then as for your comment about mourinho and strikers his records exceptional this year :roll: sends a quality striker who scored goals in the premiership last season back out on loan and keeps the premierships biggest dud signing in Torres and signs the newest dud in eto. Oh year great with strikers mourinho is :lol:
Going back to Malky did you really expect him to come out and humiliate tan in public over velinkonja.


There's a big difference in humiliating someone and just saying something along the lines of "we are very happy to have him here at Cardiff".
He was obviously a Malky signing, end of. The more you try to argue the opposite the more you make yourself look foolish and lose any credibility on here. :thumbup:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:34 pm

steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
wez1927 wrote:Fact is all the players were signed by Malky and moody not by anyone else hence the reason that tan is not happy and think His money has been wasted ,moody took.the fall for it


From recollection Tan met Mourinho at some charity gig and Mourinho recommended him so Tan went out and bought him. :lol:

Believe it or not polo that's exactly what happened and the quotes from Malky were attempting to cover tans arse I bet he wished he hadn't bothered now though.


more rubbish...
if he was a tan signing { one of many}..and tan interferes in team selection,how come he doesnt even get a squad number?
if it was a MOURINHO recommended signing...we are to believe Mourinho doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....a player not good enough for a championship bench?
and most of all..why has Tan not insisted the boy go elsewhere on loan to make a point..i know i would if whats being said was true and i was the dictator.
Malky could buy a Kalesnikoff and drive around Cardiff killing people ,and there would be some people on here saying it was Tan wearing a Malky mask..ffs

We shall have to see when the dust settles when malkys gone then as for your comment about mourinho and strikers his records exceptional this year :roll: sends a quality striker who scored goals in the premiership last season back out on loan and keeps the premierships biggest dud signing in Torres and signs the newest dud in eto. Oh year great with strikers mourinho is :lol:
Going back to Malky did you really expect him to come out and humiliate tan in public over velinkonja.

that was the choice? humiliate Tan or make up a load of lies... id hate him to be a witness against me in a court case if lies come so easy...............as for the Mourinho record with strikers utter crap..........are you serious? ..we are talking about a player not good enough for a championship teams bench, and this year not a squad place...........eto torres?.. .. as i said about the Malky mask.........your stance now is Malky LIED is a LIAR...but only did it out of the kindness of his heart to not make the feeble downtrodden Tan look silly..............get a f*cking drip

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:35 pm

Steve, I know your not one to be controversial or hysterical (unlike myself or Annis :lol:) but after reading Malkys comments I just cant see how this could be true.

Its one thing covering for Tan because he is your boss but quite another to be so glowing about a player you didnt want, and even bring your former club into it.

Malky is king of playing the media, I am sure he could have covered it being a Tan signing and not been so glowing about the lad.

Plus, if Tan had brought him in and tough titty on Malky I am sure he would have insisted he play him as well.

Tan bringing him in just doesnt add up for me.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:41 pm

one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:46 pm

soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:06 pm

wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:09 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.

got to agree ,malky is a great defensive manager just wish he could pick a decent striker weve only scored 12 goal which isnt good enough :(

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:55 pm

wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:



not the case wez malky has done lots wrong in my eyes with brayford etc.
malky has not lied about the budget as it did not go over and bellamy did not stay on the bus and that was confirmed by craig himself.
tan believes that because of the amount of money he has put in it allows him to decide what players to bring in and poke his nose in the changing room at half time if he thinks the teams not playing well.
moody was the guy who asked him to leave the changing room and then a week later he is gone.
i believe without tan the club would not exist but theres ways and means of doing things and we are not a culture you can run roughshod over as he is able to do in his own country.

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:02 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.



i agree with you regarding malky about his strikers but will reserve judgement on cornelius until he has played a few games.
as for mourinho i dont know whats happened to him since hes come back to the premiership apart from the lukaku bollock he must be the only person in this country who dosent rate mata. send him here january jose as he would be the one player capable of linking the mile between our midfield and strikers

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:15 pm

steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.



i agree with you regarding malky about his strikers but will reserve judgement on cornelius until he has played a few games.
as for mourinho i dont know whats happened to him since hes come back to the premiership apart from the lukaku bollock he must be the only person in this country who dosent rate mata. send him here january jose as he would be the one player capable of linking the mile between our midfield and strikers

im not a Chelsea fan Steve, as for Malky i can see both good and bad points..i do not like how we play,but he does seem to get some results............i dont however think he will be here very long...Tan will.....does the Tan hatred continue into the next managers reign?.. i honestly think fans need to step back and allow whatever is going to happen,just happen, if in a few weeks time we have a new manager, HE or SHE will need all our support and not a Malky hangover............i put the she in to not be sexist......i dont really think the Carol Voderman rumour is real

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:21 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.



i agree with you regarding malky about his strikers but will reserve judgement on cornelius until he has played a few games.
as for mourinho i dont know whats happened to him since hes come back to the premiership apart from the lukaku bollock he must be the only person in this country who dosent rate mata. send him here january jose as he would be the one player capable of linking the mile between our midfield and strikers

im not a Chelsea fan Steve, as for Malky i can see both good and bad points..i do not like how we play,but he does seem to get some results............i dont however think he will be here very long...Tan will.....does the Tan hatred continue into the next managers reign?.. i honestly think fans need to step back and allow whatever is going to happen,just happen, if in a few weeks time we have a new manager, HE or SHE will need all our support and not a Malky hangover............i put the she in to not be sexist......i dont really think the Carol Voderman rumour is real



i agree the football on times is dire and as i posted the other day tan is trying to sell us to the far east market and the football served up against stoke and palace will not endear us to any existing fans let alone new.
i dont support any manager only the team itself and as far as im concerned even if carol voderman came in to the club if the team played a better brand of football and finished 14th most fans would be saying malky who? ask southampton fans as theirs is a classic case

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:38 pm

steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
steve davies wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.



i agree with you regarding malky about his strikers but will reserve judgement on cornelius until he has played a few games.
as for mourinho i dont know whats happened to him since hes come back to the premiership apart from the lukaku bollock he must be the only person in this country who dosent rate mata. send him here january jose as he would be the one player capable of linking the mile between our midfield and strikers

im not a Chelsea fan Steve, as for Malky i can see both good and bad points..i do not like how we play,but he does seem to get some results............i dont however think he will be here very long...Tan will.....does the Tan hatred continue into the next managers reign?.. i honestly think fans need to step back and allow whatever is going to happen,just happen, if in a few weeks time we have a new manager, HE or SHE will need all our support and not a Malky hangover............i put the she in to not be sexist......i dont really think the Carol Voderman rumour is real



i agree the football on times is dire and as i posted the other day tan is trying to sell us to the far east market and the football served up against stoke and palace will not endear us to any existing fans let alone new.
i dont support any manager only the team itself and as far as im concerned even if carol voderman came in to the club if the team played a better brand of football and finished 14th most fans would be saying malky who? ask southampton fans as theirs is a classic case

my big fear here Steve is our fans are backing themselves into a corner over Malky...........and call a spade a spade,Malky knows this too, Malky goes,which is very likely, how much time does Carol get before she is being used to attack Tan with?
i support Cardiff, as things stand.........how can Malky remaining be a good thing for the club........or in fact be good for him?

Re: fao: Annis - re: Velonijka

Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm

wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
wez1927 wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:one minute Malky is this stand up pillar , dignified, honest, open.

then out of the blue... he has deceived us all and lied............but hang on.......ONLY to protect another.

so, has he lied about the budget to protect Moody?.........did he lie about Bellers staying on bus at palace? etc etc etc

stand up bloke or liar....................im not his greatest fan, but i do think he is straight UNLIKE YOU

but malky cant do no wrong :thumbup:


Malky should be judged on football matters.........results, tactics, signings......whats clear on here is those that back him will go to any lengths to back him............even in this case calling him a liar??????????????????......and to knock Mourinhos record with strikers is priceless in itself, but in a Malky thread..........i think i am correct in saying every striker Malky has brought in has scored far less than they have at previous clubs..........IMO he is the master of breaking play up, motivation, defensively as good as you could wish for........but aint got a clue how to change defence into attack,or get the best from a striker, he knows a good striker when he sees one, but doest GET how the rest of the team have to play for the striker to perform.

got to agree ,malky is a great defensive manager just wish he could pick a decent striker weve only scored 12 goal which isnt good enough :(


Yes, we'd all like more goals but this is about right for where we are in the league. Palace on 11, Sunderland on 12, West Ham on 13. Apart from West Brom who have 17 ( and where 2 points above them) we're doing pretty good IMO.

As for Velonijka, every manager makes mistakes & bigger & more experienced managers than Malky have made much bigger ones in the transfer market.

Again, we'd all like better, flowing, attacking football but to my mind our manager is doing pretty good in his & our first season in the prem.