Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Controversial but back to our next game

Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:55 pm

IMO we should rest the majority of our starting eleven as we are not expected to get anything against Liverpool
We need to target our 2home games and these are going to be played in a3day period
My starting eleven would be
Lewis
Brayford Connolly Hudson Taylor
Kimbo gunnerson cowie noone
Maynard Cornelius
Taylor would start as he needs games after his injury ,noone also has just got a starting place and should not need resting all the others need a start to keep them match fit as some of them may be needed against Sunderland as it comes only 2days after the Southampton game
IMO this would be a smart decision because not only would some players get a muched needed rest we would also find out if any of our 2nd string are up to premier league standard :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:02 pm

Forgot about Connolly.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:45 pm

Think some of our loans might be getting a game for us aswell after the january window shuts
Looks like we wont be signing any new players any time soon

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:33 pm

What a load of rubbish, we've gotten points out of games that we expected to get nothing before. Purposely throwing the game is insulting to the fans making the trip. We should be going into every game looking to get something out of it regardless of who its against

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:36 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You also do realise that you get punished for fielding a weakened side deliberately?

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:42 pm

Ffs who said anything about throwing the game
Take your point Barry but we named a 25man squad and it's up to the manager to pick from it

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:53 pm

Are you seriously suggesting we don't even fight for a point? Never! You think that's the way Malky will see it, Very much doubt it. We CAN get something.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:55 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:Ffs who said anything about throwing the game
Take your point Barry but we named a 25man squad and it's up to the manager to pick from it


If Mackay named that side at Anfield, he would get penalised for fielding a weak side. It would also be extremely disrespectful to fans who have paid good money to go there.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:10 pm

Well now that team has 7regular starters from last season :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:20 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:Well now that team has 7regular starters from last season :ayatollah:


Your point being? :lol:

It's a weakened side. Played deliberately - that would incur a penalty.

It's also massively disrespectful to the fans attending the game. :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:24 pm

Could say its disrespectful putting out a tired side for the third game in 7days we have a squad for a reason why not use it

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:46 am

troobloo3339 wrote:IMO we should rest the majority of our starting eleven as we are not expected to get anything against Liverpool
We need to target our 2home games and these are going to be played in a3day period
My starting eleven would be
Lewis
Brayford Connolly Hudson Taylor
Kimbo gunnerson cowie noone
Maynard Cornelius
Taylor would start as he needs games after his injury ,noone also has just got a starting place and should not need resting all the others need a start to keep them match fit as some of them may be needed against Sunderland as it comes only 2days after the Southampton game
IMO this would be a smart decision because not only would some players get a muched needed rest we would also find out if any of our 2nd string are up to premier league standard :ayatollah:



Tan would give Malky the bullet before the game not after :o

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:53 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Could say its disrespectful putting out a tired side for the third game in 7days we have a squad for a reason why not use it


You could, but you'd be wrong. :lol:

Fact is, if you were the manager and put out that side at Anfield, you'd find yourself given a penalty. :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:47 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:IMO we should rest the majority of our starting eleven as we are not expected to get anything against Liverpool
We need to target our 2home games and these are going to be played in a3day period
My starting eleven would be
Lewis
Brayford Connolly Hudson Taylor
Kimbo gunnerson cowie noone
Maynard Cornelius
Taylor would start as he needs games after his injury ,noone also has just got a starting place and should not need resting all the others need a start to keep them match fit as some of them may be needed against Sunderland as it comes only 2days after the Southampton game
IMO this would be a smart decision because not only would some players get a muched needed rest we would also find out if any of our 2nd string are up to premier league standard :ayatollah:


I can see where you are coming from mate because this next few weeks will be tough and player rotation will be key to combat the number of games in a short amount of time, but i dont think resting the whole first team would be a good move.

imo rest turner, whits and campbell. Start hudson, kim and cornelius. Give bellamy a run out at some point as well if he is fit.

Liverpool are on form but we can deffo get something out of this game!!! :malky: :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:12 pm

I hope we dont go into the game with that attitude. I hope we will have a go, who thought we would get anything against Man City.

Also a thrashing would be a disater for confidence and of course goal difference which could be worth a point come the end of the season, even keep us up.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:26 pm

What a bad post, I can't believe anyone would suggest to throw in the towel before the ball is kicked. Ever thought about how important goal difference could be at the end of the season?

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:31 pm

I remember back in our first season Brenda made a load of changes for an away game at villa called him all sorts when I saw the side. Called him a genius later on when we picked up an away win.
As for getting penalised for fielding a weakend side as long as the side is picked from the first team squad then you wont have a problem. We did the same at anfield last year just before the league cup final.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:09 pm

:lol: so chuckles is wrong then?

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:54 pm

Cardiff Daft! wrote::lol: so chuckles is wrong then?


No he isn't. :lol:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 378679.stm

Blackpool fined for fielding weakened team from their squad of 25.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football ... 521603.stm

Wolves fined for doing similar.

Stop being 'daft'. :thumbright:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:57 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Well now that team has 7regular starters from last season :ayatollah:


Your point being? :lol:

It's a weakened side. Played deliberately - that would incur a penalty.

It's also massively disrespectful to the fans attending the game. :ayatollah: :ayatollah:


Lets be fair, it's a bit tricky deciding which players are our strongest. :laughing6:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:13 pm

Chuckles is never wrong :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:15 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:Chuckles is never wrong :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Not at all! I've been wrong several times - always happy to admit it too... I'm not wrong here though & have provided evidence to back it up.

:thumbright:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:01 pm

It's only oppinion that this side is a weaker team :ayatollah:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:14 pm

If you're suggesting that Gunnarson is as strong as Medel, Turner and Caulker are the same as Connelly & Hudson, Lewis is as good as Marshall & Cowie a match for Whitts in the centre, then you're deluded!

Then again, you do think Gestede is the best striker out of Cardiff and Swansea combined, so I'm not that surprised.

:laughing6:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:16 pm

We have to put our strongest team out for every premier league game.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:13 pm

So the other 6 are ok then
Brayford , Taylor.kimbo, noone, Maynard, Cornelius

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:48 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:IMO we should rest the majority of our starting eleven as we are not expected to get anything against Liverpool
We need to target our 2home games and these are going to be played in a3day period
My starting eleven would be
Lewis
Brayford Connolly Hudson Taylor
Kimbo gunnerson cowie noone
Maynard Cornelius
Taylor would start as he needs games after his injury ,noone also has just got a starting place and should not need resting all the others need a start to keep them match fit as some of them may be needed against Sunderland as it comes only 2days after the Southampton game
IMO this would be a smart decision because not only would some players get a muched needed rest we would also find out if any of our 2nd string are up to premier league standard :ayatollah:


You've never been controversial Steve. :lol:

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:51 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:So the other 6 are ok then
Brayford , Taylor.kimbo, noone, Maynard, Cornelius


Brayford no.
Taylor yes.
Kimbo on the wing is pointless.
Noone is great - team has been crying out for him all season.
Maynard - similar to Campbell, but not quite as good in my view.
Cornelius - untested but needs to start soon in my eyes.

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:03 am

You're seriously suggesting we throw in the towel without a fight, f**k that we should go all out and give the hell, even if we lose at least we'll go down fighting not with our tails between our legs

Re: Controversial but back to our next game

Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:51 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote::lol: so chuckles is wrong then?


No he isn't. :lol:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 378679.stm

Blackpool fined for fielding weakened team from their squad of 25.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football ... 521603.stm

Wolves fined for doing similar.

Stop being 'daft'. :thumbright:


I was only asking if you were wrong, hence the "?"

Stop being 'a little bitch' :thumbup: