Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:37 pm
Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:39 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Not great, but not bad. Would I have taken that before this week? Yes, 100%.
However I would not have taken two piss poor, dreadful, gutless and toothless performances. I certainly would not have drawing a blank in these two games. Losing I can take if the performances was right, what I can't take is not trying to score, 6 shots on target in two games.
The in Malky we trust brigade can save their excuses about playing a team with a new manager.
Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:42 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Not great, but not bad. Would I have taken that before this week? Yes, 100%.
However I would not have taken two piss poor, dreadful, gutless and toothless performances. I certainly would not have drawing a blank in these two games. Losing I can take if the performances was right, what I can't take is not trying to score, 6 shots on target in two games.
The in Malky we trust brigade can save their excuses about playing a team with a new manager.
you would have taken 1 point from 2 games against nearest teams?
Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:44 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Not great, but not bad. Would I have taken that before this week? Yes, 100%.
However I would not have taken two piss poor, dreadful, gutless and toothless performances. I certainly would not have drawing a blank in these two games. Losing I can take if the performances was right, what I can't take is not trying to score, 6 shots on target in two games.
The in Malky we trust brigade can save their excuses about playing a team with a new manager.
you would have taken 1 point from 2 games against nearest teams?
Away from home, yes. IF the performances were good and we scored a goal or two. You are deluded if you think we have the divine right to go to places like Stoke who rarely lose on their own patch and win.
Craig, this is our first season in the top league, why are you expecting us to beat established teams like Stoke.
Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:49 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Not great, but not bad. Would I have taken that before this week? Yes, 100%.
However I would not have taken two piss poor, dreadful, gutless and toothless performances. I certainly would not have drawing a blank in these two games. Losing I can take if the performances was right, what I can't take is not trying to score, 6 shots on target in two games.
The in Malky we trust brigade can save their excuses about playing a team with a new manager.
you would have taken 1 point from 2 games against nearest teams?
Away from home, yes. IF the performances were good and we scored a goal or two. You are deluded if you think we have the divine right to go to places like Stoke who rarely lose on their own patch and win.
Craig, this is our first season in the top league, why are you expecting us to beat established teams like Stoke.
take the game for how it was. they were woeful against us and if we showed intent we could have beaten them quite easily.