Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:34 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:39 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:45 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Rubbish!
Why would a new manager face a backlash from fans? Not his decision to sack and appoint himself. The board may face a backlash but I would expect the crowd to get behind any new manager. The team is more important than Malky im afraid.
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:14 am
arri potta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Rubbish!
Why would a new manager face a backlash from fans? Not his decision to sack and appoint himself. The board may face a backlash but I would expect the crowd to get behind any new manager. The team is more important than Malky im afraid.
You obviously have no clue from the past 30 years of how city fans react to changing some thing they don't want!
It's just my view having seen it time and again - Annis knows what I'm getting at!
Of course the team is more important than a manager, but teams also play for managers more than others, change is not always correct, particulalry if there is no trust or players think 'who the feck is this muppet'!
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:33 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:57 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:07 am
Nuclearblue wrote:He is never gonna sack him he will loose to much money. He is trying to make him walk. And in return Malky wont walk unless the right job comes up. He is eying West Ham but that depends on big Sam keeping his job and he has done himself no harm on Saturday against Fulham.
Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:24 am
paulh_85 wrote:arri potta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Rubbish!
Why would a new manager face a backlash from fans? Not his decision to sack and appoint himself. The board may face a backlash but I would expect the crowd to get behind any new manager. The team is more important than Malky im afraid.
You obviously have no clue from the past 30 years of how city fans react to changing some thing they don't want!
It's just my view having seen it time and again - Annis knows what I'm getting at!
Of course the team is more important than a manager, but teams also play for managers more than others, change is not always correct, particulalry if there is no trust or players think 'who the feck is this muppet'!
why bring annis into it?![]()
Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:41 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:22 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:He is never gonna sack him he will loose to much money. He is trying to make him walk. And in return Malky wont walk unless the right job comes up. He is eying West Ham but that depends on big Sam keeping his job and he has done himself no harm on Saturday against Fulham.
Nukes if he doesnt think malky will keep us up and wants rid then he will get rid.
Hes not going to gamble keeping malky in charge, relegation and loss of Prem money for the sake of a few million severance pay.
Mon Dec 02, 2013 11:53 am
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:30 pm
llangainbluebird wrote:Managers get sacked all the time. If we lose against Stoke and Palace, and drop into the bottom three, then Malky will be in some difficulty. To be honest, Tan's behaviour has helped Malky, by getting us all behind him. Personally, I would like to see Malky stay, but football is a hard game.
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:38 pm
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:41 pm
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:46 pm
arri potta wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Rubbish!
Why would a new manager face a backlash from fans? Not his decision to sack and appoint himself. The board may face a backlash but I would expect the crowd to get behind any new manager. The team is more important than Malky im afraid.
You obviously have no clue from the past 30 years of how city fans react to changing some thing they don't want!
It's just my view having seen it time and again - Annis knows what I'm getting at!
Of course the team is more important than a manager, but teams also play for managers more than others, change is not always correct, particulalry if there is no trust or players think 'who the feck is this muppet'!
Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:57 pm
Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:07 pm
Bluetwin wrote:Just one man's speculation and view. not much substance to it. But that's what message boards are for!
Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:25 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:He is never gonna sack him he will loose to much money. He is trying to make him walk. And in return Malky wont walk unless the right job comes up. He is eying West Ham but that depends on big Sam keeping his job and he has done himself no harm on Saturday against Fulham.
Nukes if he doesnt think malky will keep us up and wants rid then he will get rid.
Hes not going to gamble keeping malky in charge, relegation and loss of Prem money for the sake of a few million severance pay.
Chief that is very true but as it stands now that is his game plan