If we went back to blue would that be the end of...

Bluebirds unite?

Bluebirds unite?

yes. but i think it might take them a bit of time to figure it out

Bluebirds unite?

It should be - they are about getting back to blue after all.

They could still represent the club on behalf of the fans and bluebirds unite could evolve into something more controversial...

I dunno maybe protest about players we sign and tactics malky is using or something more ridiculous

They could still represent the club on behalf of the fans and bluebirds unite could evolve into something more controversial...

I dunno maybe protest about players we sign and tactics malky is using or something more ridiculous

Thought that job was taken by Vincent Tan !?

Yes

No doubt,there'd be someone setting up a group to return to red

Bluebirds unite?

yes. but i think it might take them a bit of time to figure it out

Bluebirds unite?

I think it's already the end of them.

Bluebirds unite?

I think it's already the end of them.

How wrong you are moderator, how wrong you are...

If we went back to blue and Tan was still here, would they keep going to try and drive Tan out? I have been quiet on the issue until now, but I think switching to wanting Tan out has split the pro blues and split the BU members. VT has divided the fan base with the blue/red debate but BU divided their own members by switching their agenda to wanting Tan out on top of their initial goal of solely wanting our identity back.

I am 100% against the rebrand and I will always hate Tan for what he's done. Scarfgate made me feel like an away fan in my own stadium, I felt I didn't belong at the CCS anymore and I almost threw in the towel after that game, I was so distraught with our fans that night. But BU changed their agenda from wanting a return to blue to wanting Tan out and considering they wanted everyone in their group to unite together, changing the goals of the group was a silly thing to do.

I still believe the main aim of BU is to get our identity back and I hugely respect their efforts, but not every BU member wants Tan out. I believe this is why they had less members attending their second march, members gave up on BU because the group no longer represented the initial reason why they joined them.

In a way, Tan interfering with team issues has worked in his favour, as BU thought this gave them the right to gun for Tan, but this move has backfired and I fear BU have now lost any credibility they had built up. BU got involved with things they shouldn't have, if they had ignored outside issues and stuck to their initial plan they would be in a much stronger position now. It's a shame and I also feel sorry for Sian Branson as lots of BU members have let her down with their childish, abusive, idiotic behaviour, causing further criticism.

No doubt,there'd be someone setting up a group to return to red

If we went back to blue and Tan was still here, would they keep going to try and drive Tan out? I have been quiet on the issue until now, but I think switching to wanting Tan out has split the pro blues and split the BU members. VT has divided the fan base with the blue/red debate but BU divided their own members by switching their agenda to wanting Tan out on top of their initial goal of solely wanting our identity back.

I am 100% against the rebrand and I will always hate Tan for what he's done. Scarfgate made me feel like an away fan in my own stadium, I felt I didn't belong at the CCS anymore and I almost threw in the towel after that game, I was so distraught with our fans that night. But BU changed their agenda from wanting a return to blue to wanting Tan out and considering they wanted everyone in their group to unite together, changing the goals of the group was a silly thing to do.

I still believe the main aim of BU is to get our identity back and I hugely respect their efforts, but not every BU member wants Tan out. I believe this is why they had less members attending their second march, members gave up on BU because the group no longer represented the initial reason why they joined them.

In a way, Tan interfering with team issues has worked in his favour, as BU thought this gave them the right to gun for Tan, but this move has backfired and I fear BU have now lost any credibility they had built up. BU got involved with things they shouldn't have, if they had ignored outside issues and stuck to their initial plan they would be in a much stronger position now. It's a shame and I also feel sorry for Sian Branson as lots of BU members have let her down with their childish, abusive, idiotic behaviour, causing further criticism.

Good post !

It'll be interesting to see where the pro-blues turn if the rebrand is cranked up by Vincent Tan ! Will the pro-blue fan base have a tipping point if for example , Malky is dismissed with the team doing reasonably well or the name change is further mooted !?!

If we went back to blue and Tan was still here, would they keep going to try and drive Tan out? I have been quiet on the issue until now, but I think switching to wanting Tan out has split the pro blues and split the BU members. VT has divided the fan base with the blue/red debate but BU divided their own members by switching their agenda to wanting Tan out on top of their initial goal of solely wanting our identity back.

I am 100% against the rebrand and I will always hate Tan for what he's done. Scarfgate made me feel like an away fan in my own stadium, I felt I didn't belong at the CCS anymore and I almost threw in the towel after that game, I was so distraught with our fans that night. But BU changed their agenda from wanting a return to blue to wanting Tan out and considering they wanted everyone in their group to unite together, changing the goals of the group was a silly thing to do.

I still believe the main aim of BU is to get our identity back and I hugely respect their efforts, but not every BU member wants Tan out. I believe this is why they had less members attending their second march, members gave up on BU because the group no longer represented the initial reason why they joined them.

In a way, Tan interfering with team issues has worked in his favour, as BU thought this gave them the right to gun for Tan, but this move has backfired and I fear BU have now lost any credibility they had built up. BU got involved with things they shouldn't have, if they had ignored outside issues and stuck to their initial plan they would be in a much stronger position now. It's a shame and I also feel sorry for Sian Branson as lots of BU members have let her down with their childish, abusive, idiotic behaviour, causing further criticism.

Good post !

It'll be interesting to see where the pro-blues turn if the rebrand is cranked up by Vincent Tan ! Will the pro-blue fan base have a tipping point if for example , Malky is dismissed with the team doing reasonably well or the name change is further mooted !?!

sacking a manager is a different issue to what colour we wear.i am sure many that now embrace the red would hate to see him go, and some who are staunch blue would be relieved he was going.....thats football.....everyone has a different opinion on most things

They should have a victory party then knock it on the head. Thank fuk

If we went back to blue and Tan was still here, would they keep going to try and drive Tan out? I have been quiet on the issue until now, but I think switching to wanting Tan out has split the pro blues and split the BU members. VT has divided the fan base with the blue/red debate but BU divided their own members by switching their agenda to wanting Tan out on top of their initial goal of solely wanting our identity back.

I am 100% against the rebrand and I will always hate Tan for what he's done. Scarfgate made me feel like an away fan in my own stadium, I felt I didn't belong at the CCS anymore and I almost threw in the towel after that game, I was so distraught with our fans that night. But BU changed their agenda from wanting a return to blue to wanting Tan out and considering they wanted everyone in their group to unite together, changing the goals of the group was a silly thing to do.

I still believe the main aim of BU is to get our identity back and I hugely respect their efforts, but not every BU member wants Tan out. I believe this is why they had less members attending their second march, members gave up on BU because the group no longer represented the initial reason why they joined them.

In a way, Tan interfering with team issues has worked in his favour, as BU thought this gave them the right to gun for Tan, but this move has backfired and I fear BU have now lost any credibility they had built up. BU got involved with things they shouldn't have, if they had ignored outside issues and stuck to their initial plan they would be in a much stronger position now. It's a shame and I also feel sorry for Sian Branson as lots of BU members have let her down with their childish, abusive, idiotic behaviour, causing further criticism.

Good post !

It'll be interesting to see where the pro-blues turn if the rebrand is cranked up by Vincent Tan ! Will the pro-blue fan base have a tipping point if for example , Malky is dismissed with the team doing reasonably well or the name change is further mooted !?!

sacking a manager is a different issue to what colour we wear.i am sure many that now embrace the red would hate to see him go, and some who are staunch blue would be relieved he was going.....thats football.....everyone has a different opinion on most things

Would those whom now embrace the red react any differently to the pro-blue fans if Vincent Tan did dismiss Malky in your opinion , Soul !?

If we went back to blue and Tan was still here, would they keep going to try and drive Tan out? I have been quiet on the issue until now, but I think switching to wanting Tan out has split the pro blues and split the BU members. VT has divided the fan base with the blue/red debate but BU divided their own members by switching their agenda to wanting Tan out on top of their initial goal of solely wanting our identity back.

I am 100% against the rebrand and I will always hate Tan for what he's done. Scarfgate made me feel like an away fan in my own stadium, I felt I didn't belong at the CCS anymore and I almost threw in the towel after that game, I was so distraught with our fans that night. But BU changed their agenda from wanting a return to blue to wanting Tan out and considering they wanted everyone in their group to unite together, changing the goals of the group was a silly thing to do.

I still believe the main aim of BU is to get our identity back and I hugely respect their efforts, but not every BU member wants Tan out. I believe this is why they had less members attending their second march, members gave up on BU because the group no longer represented the initial reason why they joined them.
In a way, Tan interfering with team issues has worked in his favour, as BU thought this gave them the right to gun for Tan, but this move has backfired and I fear BU have now lost any credibility they had built up. BU got involved with things they shouldn't have, if they had ignored outside issues and stuck to their initial plan they would be in a much stronger position now. It's a shame and I also feel sorry for Sian Branson as lots of BU members have let her down with their childish, abusive, idiotic behaviour, causing further criticism.

Good post !

It'll be interesting to see where the pro-blues turn if the rebrand is cranked up by Vincent Tan ! Will the pro-blue fan base have a tipping point if for example , Malky is dismissed with the team doing reasonably well or the name change is further mooted !?!

sacking a manager is a different issue to what colour we wear.i am sure many that now embrace the red would hate to see him go, and some who are staunch blue would be relieved he was going.....thats football.....everyone has a different opinion on most things

Would those whom now embrace the red react any differently to the pro-blue fans if Vincent Tan did dismiss Malky in your opinion , Soul !?

i dont get the connection.......avb.jol and chris houghton are shorter odds than malky to leave post.........fans at those clubs no doubt are split.......isnt a colour thing..isnt an anti tan thing either..if you read through here there are lots of pro blues that wouldnt be heartbroken if Malky left.........no doubt there are red scarf wearers that would be broken hearted.

Well yeah... the only purpose of Bluebirds Unite is to protest against the red. I don't think they would care if Tan if was in charge if we went back to blue.