Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:31 am
Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:44 am
Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:47 am
Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:52 am
Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:11 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:32 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:06 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:43 pm
CardiffKid wrote:This is the biggest problem with the rebrand. It makes no commercial sense.
We now have a confused identity
Colour is not a determining factor in who people support
Most 'customers' have been upset (to varying degrees)
Most businesses rebrands are successful, people like them, or they are ambivalent. In City's case, most people hate it or are ambivalent.
All industries are specific. Cardiff is in the football industry where identity, history etc DO matter.I don't care about Lloyds TSB's colours are. It isn't important, yet in football, and sport in general these kind of things are important.
People often talk about the Washington Redskins maybe changing there name as it becomes increasingly controvsial. If I were a redskins fans, I'd probably oppose it, but at least there is a rationale behind them become the Washington Reds. At least it is understandable and makes sense.
Our rebrand makes zero sense. It hasn't benefitted us one bit, apart from in Tan's own warped mind.
It's full of shit, and as a customer of HSBC and Cardiff City, I'll tell you now..I care far more about the latter. I will switch my bank on a whim, but I won't switch my football club.
Our colours and identity mean a lot to me, and I'm not going to give it up without a fight.
That fight continues sunday, 2pm, outside the castle. All City fans should consider being there IMO.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:51 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:00 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:That's fine, but who are you to tell people to move on?
Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:06 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:That's fine, but who are you to tell people to move on?
Chuckles,pot,kettle,black.
Its only his opinion.You've got umteen thousand posts as the forum police.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:10 pm
markeMark wrote:Everyone knows that football is as much big business as it is sport. Cardiff City FC are a business that have a multi million pound turnover, and like all businesses are in a competitive dog eat dog world. Whether we like it or not, that world is changing, and the British football scene in 10 or 20 years time will be completely different to what it is now. We know what happens to businesses that don't move with the times, look at Woolworth, Bradford & Bingley, the British motorbike industry etc. etc. Plenty of companies have had to carry out rebranding exercises to ensure that they maintain commercial viability. Lloyds Bank for example have been branded green, then blue, now green again with the return of the black horse. Vincent Tan looks at Cardiff City as purely a business venture, and he needs a successful club to ensure he gets a good return on his investment. Whether he succeeds or fails remains to be seen. I would prefer to see the team play in Blue like most other supporters would, but we have to decide whether or not we want a football team playing at the highest level, or watch the likes of Hartlepool, Fleetwood and Newport on a regular basis. The leagues are growing further apart, and the money available for the top teams will continue to grow, while there will be less and less for the lower leagues. I can't see 92 league sides still in existence in 10 or 15 years time. If we want to be part of the top tiers of football, we are going to have to accept that change is inevitable, and move with the time, or return to playing unfashionable sides in front of four or five thousand people again.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:30 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:That's fine, but who are you to tell people to move on?
Chuckles,pot,kettle,black.
Its only his opinion.You've got umteen thousand posts as the forum police.
WRONG. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, as I've always said. What's wrong is for others to tell people it's time to get over it.
)
Wed Nov 20, 2013 3:56 pm
CardiffKid wrote:This is the biggest problem with the rebrand. It makes no commercial sense.
We now have a confused identity
Colour is not a determining factor in who people support
Most 'customers' have been upset (to varying degrees)
Most businesses rebrands are successful, people like them, or they are ambivalent. In City's case, most people hate it or are ambivalent.
All industries are specific. Cardiff is in the football industry where identity, history etc DO matter.I don't care about Lloyds TSB's colours are. It isn't important, yet in football, and sport in general these kind of things are important.
People often talk about the Washington Redskins maybe changing there name as it becomes increasingly controvsial. If I were a redskins fans, I'd probably oppose it, but at least there is a rationale behind them become the Washington Reds. At least it is understandable and makes sense.
Our rebrand makes zero sense. It hasn't benefitted us one bit, apart from in Tan's own warped mind.
It's full of shit, and as a customer of HSBC and Cardiff City, I'll tell you now..I care far more about the latter. I will switch my bank on a whim, but I won't switch my football club.
Our colours and identity mean a lot to me, and I'm not going to give it up without a fight.
That fight continues sunday, 2pm, outside the castle. All City fans should consider being there IMO.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:05 pm
JonCCFC wrote:CardiffKid wrote:This is the biggest problem with the rebrand. It makes no commercial sense.
We now have a confused identity
Colour is not a determining factor in who people support
Most 'customers' have been upset (to varying degrees)
Most businesses rebrands are successful, people like them, or they are ambivalent. In City's case, most people hate it or are ambivalent.
All industries are specific. Cardiff is in the football industry where identity, history etc DO matter.I don't care about Lloyds TSB's colours are. It isn't important, yet in football, and sport in general these kind of things are important.
People often talk about the Washington Redskins maybe changing there name as it becomes increasingly controvsial. If I were a redskins fans, I'd probably oppose it, but at least there is a rationale behind them become the Washington Reds. At least it is understandable and makes sense.
Our rebrand makes zero sense. It hasn't benefitted us one bit, apart from in Tan's own warped mind.
It's full of shit, and as a customer of HSBC and Cardiff City, I'll tell you now..I care far more about the latter. I will switch my bank on a whim, but I won't switch my football club.
Our colours and identity mean a lot to me, and I'm not going to give it up without a fight.
That fight continues sunday, 2pm, outside the castle. All City fans should consider being there IMO.
Great post. I wish the fans who keep licking Tan's arse would understand this.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:09 pm
JonCCFC wrote:CardiffKid wrote:This is the biggest problem with the rebrand. It makes no commercial sense.
We now have a confused identity
Colour is not a determining factor in who people support
Most 'customers' have been upset (to varying degrees)
Most businesses rebrands are successful, people like them, or they are ambivalent. In City's case, most people hate it or are ambivalent.
All industries are specific. Cardiff is in the football industry where identity, history etc DO matter.I don't care about Lloyds TSB's colours are. It isn't important, yet in football, and sport in general these kind of things are important.
People often talk about the Washington Redskins maybe changing there name as it becomes increasingly controvsial. If I were a redskins fans, I'd probably oppose it, but at least there is a rationale behind them become the Washington Reds. At least it is understandable and makes sense.
Our rebrand makes zero sense. It hasn't benefitted us one bit, apart from in Tan's own warped mind.
It's full of shit, and as a customer of HSBC and Cardiff City, I'll tell you now..I care far more about the latter. I will switch my bank on a whim, but I won't switch my football club.
Our colours and identity mean a lot to me, and I'm not going to give it up without a fight.
That fight continues sunday, 2pm, outside the castle. All City fans should consider being there IMO.
Great post. I wish the fans who keep licking Tan's arse would understand this.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:14 pm
mjw6150 wrote:
It's his opinion, he has posted it and subsequently said in a later post that is opinion is no more valid than others.
What's that word you keep using... (or misusing)
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:33 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:38 pm
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:39 pm
soulofthesea wrote:its a sensible post. the people buying clubs these days dont do it for the love of the club,and the money involved is insane.
i have read on here.we get tan out and a new buyer in.there has always been somebody ready to take over.
difference is,its now over 100 million. ALL our previous owners combined could not buy us now.
its getting more and more like the NFL.we could be white and red bull Cardiff nxt
im going to continue wearing blue.but really not sure of the future.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:40 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:soulofthesea wrote:its a sensible post. the people buying clubs these days dont do it for the love of the club,and the money involved is insane.
i have read on here.we get tan out and a new buyer in.there has always been somebody ready to take over.
difference is,its now over 100 million. ALL our previous owners combined could not buy us now.
its getting more and more like the NFL.we could be white and red bull Cardiff nxt
im going to continue wearing blue.but really not sure of the future.
It is a sensible post - but the non-sensible part is telling people that they should move on.![]()
I certainly won't.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:44 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:
It's his opinion, he has posted it and subsequently said in a later post that is opinion is no more valid than others.
What's that word you keep using... (or misusing)
You seem to have completely missed the thread title. Silly you.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:48 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:That's fine, but who are you to tell people to move on?
Chuckles,pot,kettle,black.
Its only his opinion.You've got umteen thousand posts as the forum police.
WRONG. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, as I've always said. What's wrong is for others to tell people it's time to get over it.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:50 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:JonCCFC wrote:CardiffKid wrote:This is the biggest problem with the rebrand. It makes no commercial sense.
We now have a confused identity
Colour is not a determining factor in who people support
Most 'customers' have been upset (to varying degrees)
Most businesses rebrands are successful, people like them, or they are ambivalent. In City's case, most people hate it or are ambivalent.
All industries are specific. Cardiff is in the football industry where identity, history etc DO matter.I don't care about Lloyds TSB's colours are. It isn't important, yet in football, and sport in general these kind of things are important.
People often talk about the Washington Redskins maybe changing there name as it becomes increasingly controvsial. If I were a redskins fans, I'd probably oppose it, but at least there is a rationale behind them become the Washington Reds. At least it is understandable and makes sense.
Our rebrand makes zero sense. It hasn't benefitted us one bit, apart from in Tan's own warped mind.
It's full of shit, and as a customer of HSBC and Cardiff City, I'll tell you now..I care far more about the latter. I will switch my bank on a whim, but I won't switch my football club.
Our colours and identity mean a lot to me, and I'm not going to give it up without a fight.
That fight continues sunday, 2pm, outside the castle. All City fans should consider being there IMO.
Great post. I wish the fans who keep licking Tan's arse would understand this.
Says you who has bought a rebranded top
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:50 pm
pembroke allan wrote:No more wrong than other posters who say red fans are not true fans ect ect, but who's opinions are defended by people on here!
Double standards at its best!
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:56 pm
markeMark wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:mjw6150 wrote:
It's his opinion, he has posted it and subsequently said in a later post that is opinion is no more valid than others.
What's that word you keep using... (or misusing)
You seem to have completely missed the thread title. Silly you.
I am not telling you that you have to move on, I am expressing a point of view in the same way that others do when using this forum. I believe what I said to be true, and I accept that I may be proved wrong in the future, time will tell. I know everyone has their own view on this, and I respect the fact that there are plenty of people who don't agree with me, but would not consider posting any derogatory remarks just because they disagree with my point of view.Everyone is entitled to their own viewpoint, and in some ways I hope that I am proved wrong, because I prefer the blue shirts as I stated previously. Just as a matter of interest, if Cardiff survive in this division and go from strength to strength and end up being a top ten side, would you still be fighting against the shirts if they are still playing in red in say 4 years time? I am just curious as to how long the fight will go on for, and whether people will stop watching them if they don't revert to blue.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:58 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No more wrong than other posters who say red fans are not true fans ect ect, but who's opinions are defended by people on here!
Double standards at its best!
You are right... Certainly isn't double standards by me though... so don't know why you are saying that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:00 pm
pembroke allan wrote:
Didnt say it was you did I??? Was posting an opinion on double standards which I understand we are all entitled to do? ?
Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:11 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:
Didnt say it was you did I??? Was posting an opinion on double standards which I understand we are all entitled to do? ?
I'm the only one complaining about it in this thread, so it must have been me... otherwise there is no possibility of any "double standards" are there Allan?
Keep up.
Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:21 pm