Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:57 pm

SIGN UP!!

I know there are 100s if not 1000s of you who are a little cautious about signing up due to the pro Tan feeling on this forum but implore you to stop curtain twitching and throw them open, air your views. This club is as much yours as it is there's, don't feel intimidated by the bullies on here who are scared of us and what we can achieve.

Since signing up I have been empowered and the more of us that sign up and have our say the better things will become, Barry Chuckles and CardiffKid are doing a good job spreading our message but we need more of us. Lets educate people on here and try and put across how much our identity means to us. Joining messageboards like this to educate pro reds and discourage them from promoting Tan and his filthy red rag is the best way to tackle the rebrand. Education not belittling has got to be the mantra from now on in.

And remember:

WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:04 pm

TheBlueWillRise wrote:SIGN UP!!

I know there are 100s if not 1000s of you who are a little cautious about signing up due to the pro Tan feeling on this forum but implore you to stop curtain twitching and throw them open, air your views. This club is as much yours as it is there's, don't feel intimidated by the bullies on here who are scared of us and what we can achieve.

Since signing up I have been empowered and the more of us that sign up and have our say the better things will become, Barry Chuckles and CardiffKid are doing a good job spreading our message but we need more of us. Lets educate people on here and try and put across how much our identity means to us. Joining messageboards like this to educate pro reds and discourage them from promoting Tan and his filthy red rag is the best way to tackle the rebrand. Education not belittling has got to be the mantra from now on in.

And remember:

WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED

You have my vote. :ayatollah:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:22 pm

WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:24 pm

soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


People who value the clubs identities and traditions more than a pile of money that's been LOANED to the club. :thumbup:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:27 pm

soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:38 pm

CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:51 pm

GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


No it won't. A million marched in London against the Iraq war but opinion polls showed that around half the population (30 million) opposed the war itself. It's the same with every march.

Yes, there is more to the club than a colour, but the colour and bluebirds represents so much. It's a real shame if you think not.

Tell me please, why have you got such a problem with people showing their pride in this? I am genuinely intrigued

Image

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:53 pm

Up the revolution! :happy1:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:55 pm

GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


how do u know the majority want him to stay ? have u gone round every Cardiff fans house and taken votes or summin lol ? I very much doubt it

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:59 pm

CardiffKid wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


No it won't. A million marched in London against the Iraq war but opinion polls showed that around half the population (30 million) opposed the war itself. It's the same with every march.

Yes, there is more to the club than a colour, but the colour and bluebirds represents so much. It's a real shame if you think not.

Tell me please, why have you got such a problem with people showing their pride in this? I am genuinely intrigued

Image

I haven't got a problem,i think its you who has a problem with fans who have rightly or wrongly made their choice.Stop trying to force your opinions on people and give it a rest.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:59 pm

Even if 27,000 marched, Tan would dig his heels in.

If Tan say's we are red, then we are red, sadly.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:01 pm

Canton stand bluebird wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


how do u know the majority want him to stay ? have u gone round every Cardiff fans house and taken votes or summin lol ? I very much doubt it

The independent done a poll and 7/10 fans said they were happy with tan and want him to stay.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:02 pm

GOLD NUGGET wrote:The independent done a poll and 7/10 fans said they were happy with tan and want him to stay.


How many were polled? First I heard of it.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:02 pm

GOLD NUGGET wrote:
Canton stand bluebird wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


how do u know the majority want him to stay ? have u gone round every Cardiff fans house and taken votes or summin lol ? I very much doubt it

The independent done a poll and 7/10 fans said they were happy with tan and want him to stay.


ohh wow because the paper said so okay then because papers never lie or be biased yeah ok :laughing6:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:04 pm

Canton stand bluebird wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
Canton stand bluebird wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


how do u know the majority want him to stay ? have u gone round every Cardiff fans house and taken votes or summin lol ? I very much doubt it

The independent done a poll and 7/10 fans said they were happy with tan and want him to stay.


ohh wow because the paper said so okay then because papers never lie or be biased yeah ok :laughing6:

you asked me and i told you.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:05 pm

GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
GOLD NUGGET wrote:
CardiffKid wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:WHO WOULD WANT OUR VERY RICH OWNER REMOVED THE MOST?

JACKS...........HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM


And who would revel in the disappearance of the bluebird and our famous Blue shirts? Jacks!

It's not a Tan in or out thing.

This is about being proud of who we are.

We are Cardiff City, we have our own icons and colours and we don't need new, fake ones imported.

:malky:

Fans are proud of Cardiff city,a club is about more than just a colour.
The majority of fans want vt to stay.Bu have misjudged the wish of the majority and this will be their downfall.The proof of this will be in how many turn up for the march.


No it won't. A million marched in London against the Iraq war but opinion polls showed that around half the population (30 million) opposed the war itself. It's the same with every march.

Yes, there is more to the club than a colour, but the colour and bluebirds represents so much. It's a real shame if you think not.

Tell me please, why have you got such a problem with people showing their pride in this? I am genuinely intrigued

Image

I haven't got a problem,i think its you who has a problem with fans who have rightly or wrongly made their choice.Stop trying to force your opinions on people and give it a rest.


It's a messageboard. I write what I think and you can choose to read it or not. Same goes with your posts. No one is forcing anything.

I just think the above badge and our colours are worth fighting for. You evidently don't. That's your prerogative, but lots of people care about this issue and we aren't going away, so the sooner Tan see's sense the better for all involved.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:15 pm

Noticed GOLD NUGGET conveniently avoided my questions. :laughing6:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:33 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:Noticed GOLD NUGGET conveniently avoided my questions. :laughing6:

do you think the majority want blue back?
and if so.what sort of percentage?

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:39 pm

soulofthesea wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Noticed GOLD NUGGET conveniently avoided my questions. :laughing6:

do you think the majority want blue back?
and if so.what sort of percentage?


Don't see the relevance, but I'd say that 100% of fans would prefer to see CCFC in blue.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:45 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Noticed GOLD NUGGET conveniently avoided my questions. :laughing6:

do you think the majority want blue back?
and if so.what sort of percentage?


Don't see the relevance, but I'd say that 100% of fans would prefer to see CCFC in blue.

i agree.
so with 100% already united..how the hell can a group spring up called Bluebirds Unite to fight for our colours that alienates the majority.
there is no anti blue
just anti idiots

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:56 pm

soulofthesea wrote:i agree.
so with 100% already united..how the hell can a group spring up called Bluebirds Unite to fight for our colours that alienates the majority.
there is no anti blue
just anti idiots


If you think the fan base is united about the rebrand, you're deluded sorry.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:01 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:i agree.
so with 100% already united..how the hell can a group spring up called Bluebirds Unite to fight for our colours that alienates the majority.
there is no anti blue
just anti idiots


If you think the fan base is united about the rebrand, you're deluded sorry.

you just said 100%
so its you thats deluded

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:05 pm

soulofthesea wrote:you just said 100%
so its you thats deluded


Not at all. I said 100% would prefer the blue... That doesn't mean that the fan base is totally united. Don't be so naive!

You've got people who think it's more important than being in the prem, so who don't really care about the colour (but prefer the red), some who've taken it on the chin reluctantly... And other strands. Nowhere near United.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:07 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
soulofthesea wrote:you just said 100%
so its you thats deluded


Not at all. I said 100% would prefer the blue... That doesn't mean that the fan base is totally united. Don't be so naive!

You've got people who think it's more important than being in the prem, so who don't really care about the colour (but prefer the red), some who've taken it on the chin reluctantly... And other strands. Nowhere near United.

right just wanted to clear this up.............your 100% is sort of like tans 5%........same school?

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:12 pm

soulofthesea wrote:right just wanted to clear this up.............your 100% is sort of like tans 5%........same school?


You asked me what percentage would prefer to see CCFC in blue, that doesn't mean the fan base is united.. It's split as to what cost should the return to blue should be... Simple enough. :thumbup:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:14 pm

seriously,i do know what you meant, but you know what i meant too. there are no ANTI blues, but there are a hell of a lot more pro blues that actually care and make a point of wearing the blue than BU attracts at present.
the concern is they look like they might do more harm than good.
we want our blue back....ffs ..how can you mess that up?
EVERYONE would prefer blue.....thousands actually wear blue..HOW?

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:16 pm

soulofthesea wrote:seriously,i do know what you meant, but you know what i meant too. there are no ANTI blues, but there are a hell of a lot more pro blues that actually care and make a point of wearing the blue than BU attracts at present.
the concern is they look like they might do more harm than good.
we want our blue back....ffs ..how can you mess that up?
EVERYONE would prefer blue.....thousands actually wear blue..HOW?


You asked a question, I gave you an answer.. The fan base certainly isn't united & if you think it is, you are deluded.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:21 pm

I think chuckles the point is Bu are more divisive than uniting.

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:25 pm

Legs 11 wrote:I think chuckles the point is Bu are more divisive than uniting.


I think you'll find it's Tan that caused the divide, nobody else. :thumbup:

Re: FAO of the BU browsers - Silent majority

Mon Nov 18, 2013 9:28 pm

Legs 11 wrote:I think chuckles the point is Bu are more divisive than uniting.

YEP.
thousands in blue watch a team in red..........conclusion ......they want blue back.thousands do
30 people demonstrate with anti tan banners......conclusion.......they want tan out......30 of them