Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:43 pm
Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:46 pm
Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:51 pm
bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:59 pm
carlccfc wrote:bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Who the hell believes his appearance would be too provocative.
That is ludicrous.
Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:41 am
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:06 am
bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:35 am
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:45 am
Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:48 am
Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:07 am
BracklaBlue72 wrote:bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Oh FFS! Who the fck would be provoked by us parading one of our legendary players???!
There's no other conclusion other than that Tan doesn't want to upset the Jacks!
Another ridiculous decision by our Fruitcake owner
Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:18 am
RICK+CCFC wrote:Personally, i cant see why John Buchannan & maybe John Toshach or some other Swans player who played that match were presented before kick off,,,,,that would have been excellent.
Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:46 pm
Jackbustard wrote:RICK+CCFC wrote:Personally, i cant see why John Buchannan & maybe John Toshach or some other Swans player who played that match were presented before kick off,,,,,that would have been excellent.
Agreed let get Tate and Trundle out there with their flag. That will spice it up a bit.
Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:06 pm
bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Sat Nov 02, 2013 2:33 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:BracklaBlue72 wrote:bluebirddavid wrote:Whilst John remains City's guest at Sunday's game he will no longer be paraded on the pitch.
The reason being that it is deemed to be too provocative.
But there will be nowt wrong in chanting his name to acknowledge his presence.
Oh FFS! Who the fck would be provoked by us parading one of our legendary players???!
There's no other conclusion other than that Tan doesn't want to upset the Jacks!
Another ridiculous decision by our Fruitcake owner
Muppet
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:26 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:32 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:34 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:54 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I'm struggling to think how it would offend us jacks
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:03 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:05 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:13 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:20 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:38 pm
Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:01 pm
6 bysedd wrote:I'm struggling to think how it would offend us jacks