Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:26 pm
If we were to change to a 3-5-2 Formation, what starting 11 would you go with?
Personally I would go:
Marshall
Caulker Hudson Turner
Medel
Whittingham Mutch
Kim Bellamy
Campbell Odemwingie
Personally I would go:
Marshall
Caulker Hudson Turner
Medel
Whittingham Mutch
Kim Bellamy
Campbell Odemwingie
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Thu Oct 24, 2013 5:31 pm
You need to play wing backs in a 3-5-2.
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:40 pm
all out attack, if we conceed 3 score 4. its the only way malky can satisfy the fickle few.
lol, in malky we trust
lol, in malky we trust
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:50 pm
.....................marshall
........turner cauks huds..........
Theophile............................taylor
.......whitts medel mutch.........
.........campbell...PO............
Wouldnt fancy playing that formation myself but just to answer your question id go with the above
........turner cauks huds..........
Theophile............................taylor
.......whitts medel mutch.........
.........campbell...PO............
Wouldnt fancy playing that formation myself but just to answer your question id go with the above
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:21 pm
blue lagoon wrote:all out attack, if we conceed 3 score 4. its the only way malky can satisfy the fickle few.
lol, in malky we trust
Exactly. That tactic worked really well for Holloway at Palace! Remember Bobby Gould as Wales manager saying before our game away to Holland "we're not afraid, we will have a go at them". We lost 8-0!
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 9:13 am
JoeyBlue wrote:If we were to change to a 3-5-2 Formation, what starting 11 would you go with?
Personally I would go:
Marshall
Caulker Hudson Turner
Medel
Whittingham Mutch
Kim Bellamy
Campbell Odemwingie
You need wing backs with 3 at the back.
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 9:17 am
JoeyBlue wrote:If we were to change to a 3-5-2 Formation, what starting 11 would you go with?
Personally I would go:
Marshall
Caulker Hudson Turner
Medel
Whittingham Mutch
Kim Bellamy
Campbell Odemwingie
no offense.... but thats horrendous!
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 10:02 am
I would play Medel at the back in a 3-5-2 allowing for a slightly more attacking midfield
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:13 am
I dont think we have the CB's to platy 3 at the back, taylor and Theo could prob do a job at wingback but we would end up with a back 5.
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:31 am
Deano1 wrote:I would play Medel at the back in a 3-5-2 allowing for a slightly more attacking midfield
thats a really good shout, its where he plays for Chile.
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:40 am
Marshall
CB: Caulker
CB: Hudson
CB: Turner
RWB: KTC
LWB: Taylor
DM: Medel
CM: Whitts
CM: Kim Bo
AM: Mutch
ST: Campbell
I'd rather go with a 4-1-3-1-1 formation but yeh.
CB: Caulker
CB: Hudson
CB: Turner
RWB: KTC
LWB: Taylor
DM: Medel
CM: Whitts
CM: Kim Bo
AM: Mutch
ST: Campbell
I'd rather go with a 4-1-3-1-1 formation but yeh.
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:41 am
the concept of "all out attack"..is an anathema to Mackayblue lagoon wrote:all out attack, if we conceed 3 score 4. its the only way malky can satisfy the fickle few.
lol, in malky we trust
Re: Your 3-5-2 Formation?
Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:46 am
angelis49 wrote:the concept of "all out attack"..is an anathema to Mackayblue lagoon wrote:all out attack, if we conceed 3 score 4. its the only way malky can satisfy the fickle few.
lol, in malky we trust
Amongst other things its one of the reasons holloway got the sack and failed to keep blackpool up.