Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:39 pm
Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:01 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:17 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:36 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:42 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:50 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:52 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:05 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:47 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 11:38 am
Wed Oct 23, 2013 3:07 pm
Berwyn wrote:In the interest of balance can I offer a defence of Vincent Tan in all of the goings on of late? To be fair, to do so would be a bit of a lonely voice but I always tend to look at both sides to get an even view.
In fairness VT committed the number one sin in football where, as owner, he dared to tell his manager how to win games. So is that indefensible? I have no doubt that he is not the first owner nor will he be the last to stick his nose in to what goes on over the white line. Let’s assume that this is true and he did actually do what everyone is saying.
Firstly, can I say that the biggest critics of his actions have been the national press. Well, come on, that is laughable. Yes I realise they are just filling columns but, really? The national press? How many England managers have faced the chop simply because they dared to pick a team that differed from the one the press decided on? It could be argued that the only reason that England have failed to win anything in practically living memory is because of the press deciding what the manager should do and putting him under massive pressure to fall in line. So to me, for the press to even comment on VT is beyond pot and kettle.
That in itself isn’t a defence as my title promised. What I would say is, VT’s biggest defence is he is very new to football. What he does, and what he is used to, is he gets a business. That business buys a load of stuff then sells that stuff and so on. At the end of the month VT looks at the balance sheet and says yes very good but buy more stuff and sell more. And so no. The rules are quite straight forward. They all follow business rules and an accountant makes sense of it all. This is the story of a very successful business man - Vincent Tan.
All of a sudden though he’s got himself in to a new “business” but this one doesn’t follow any of those business rules. In normal business you can, in reality, conclude that the more you invest, the more you make. Football isn’t like that though. Who was it that said “the best way to turn a rich man in to a poor man is through football”?
If anyone is looking to criticise the recruitment person at any football club, at this moment in time, then look no further than the guy at Real Madrid. His £100million on a broken Gareth Bale shadows anything any British club did. I’m not saying Bale was a bad buy, what I’m saying is football is unpredictable.
That is the game that VT will learn to either love or walk away from. He will learn that you cannot walk in to a casino, throw some cash on the crap table and then try to lecture the dice on how to land. Football is the same crap table, for an owner. You throw lots of good money on the crap table and hope something happens. Mostly though, for everyone, football is just a massive waste of money that will mostly just bring you lots of promise, anticipation, and then disappointment.
As an owner of a football club, the best you can do is throw your gamble on the table and just sit back and watch the horses come in, or not. The worst thing you can do is stick your nose in because that is the fastest and most perfect way of making sure you will lose. Even if the likes of Alex Ferguson bought a football club, guaranteed, if he stuck his nose in to the team then he will lose. On a match day the manager and his team is the football club. Everyone else is second place.
In my eyes VT has two choices. Either he accepts that the manger and the team are a no go zone or he spends a massive amount of money discovering that the manager and the team are a no go zone.
What we can’t do is blame him for not knowing this because he is very new to the mad game of football. It doesn’t surprise me that he’s tried to normalise it through his business eyes, it’s just football is nowhere near a normal business. Suits, accountants, smiles and handshakes do not score goals. Neither do the best footballers in the world. Teams win games. You f**k with that team, you lose.
Wed Oct 23, 2013 3:27 pm
underthebridge47 wrote:What an excellent post.
Something everyone should read.
I was fuming in the wake of the news moody had gone, screaming for "Tan out" not bothered by admitting that, but its when the storm calms, and when you read things like this, and also realise the press are full of shit you start to get a clearer more balanced view.
Thank for a great post
Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:05 pm
Steve the Tea TM (c) wrote:Berwyn wrote:In the interest of balance .....
Berwyn, you can't defend what he's done, mate.
StT.
Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:06 pm

Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:22 pm
Bluebird64 wrote:Why would anyone want to try and defend the indefendable?
Tan out , its the only way forward
Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:40 pm
Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:49 pm
Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:07 pm
Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:27 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Why would anyone want to try and defend the indefendable?
Tan out , its the only way forward
youve got millions in the back then?
happy days Bluebird64 for our new owner
Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:41 pm
Bluebird64 wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Why would anyone want to try and defend the indefendable?
Tan out , its the only way forward
youve got millions in the back then?
happy days Bluebird64 for our new owner
Johnny, you are attacking the wrong person mate. Tan is everything that you do not want in an owner and the sooner he leaves the better. Tan out, you know it makes sense.
Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:11 pm
Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:51 pm
Steve the Tea TM (c) wrote:Berwyn wrote:In the interest of balance can I offer a defence of Vincent Tan in all of the goings on of late? To be fair, to do so would be a bit of a lonely voice but I always tend to look at both sides to get an even view.
In fairness VT committed the number one sin in football where, as owner, he dared to tell his manager how to win games. So is that indefensible? I have no doubt that he is not the first owner nor will he be the last to stick his nose in to what goes on over the white line. Let’s assume that this is true and he did actually do what everyone is saying.
Firstly, can I say that the biggest critics of his actions have been the national press. Well, come on, that is laughable. Yes I realise they are just filling columns but, really? The national press? How many England managers have faced the chop simply because they dared to pick a team that differed from the one the press decided on? It could be argued that the only reason that England have failed to win anything in practically living memory is because of the press deciding what the manager should do and putting him under massive pressure to fall in line. So to me, for the press to even comment on VT is beyond pot and kettle.
That in itself isn’t a defence as my title promised. What I would say is, VT’s biggest defence is he is very new to football. What he does, and what he is used to, is he gets a business. That business buys a load of stuff then sells that stuff and so on. At the end of the month VT looks at the balance sheet and says yes very good but buy more stuff and sell more. And so no. The rules are quite straight forward. They all follow business rules and an accountant makes sense of it all. This is the story of a very successful business man - Vincent Tan.
All of a sudden though he’s got himself in to a new “business” but this one doesn’t follow any of those business rules. In normal business you can, in reality, conclude that the more you invest, the more you make. Football isn’t like that though. Who was it that said “the best way to turn a rich man in to a poor man is through football”?
If anyone is looking to criticise the recruitment person at any football club, at this moment in time, then look no further than the guy at Real Madrid. His £100million on a broken Gareth Bale shadows anything any British club did. I’m not saying Bale was a bad buy, what I’m saying is football is unpredictable.
That is the game that VT will learn to either love or walk away from. He will learn that you cannot walk in to a casino, throw some cash on the crap table and then try to lecture the dice on how to land. Football is the same crap table, for an owner. You throw lots of good money on the crap table and hope something happens. Mostly though, for everyone, football is just a massive waste of money that will mostly just bring you lots of promise, anticipation, and then disappointment.
As an owner of a football club, the best you can do is throw your gamble on the table and just sit back and watch the horses come in, or not. The worst thing you can do is stick your nose in because that is the fastest and most perfect way of making sure you will lose. Even if the likes of Alex Ferguson bought a football club, guaranteed, if he stuck his nose in to the team then he will lose. On a match day the manager and his team is the football club. Everyone else is second place.
In my eyes VT has two choices. Either he accepts that the manger and the team are a no go zone or he spends a massive amount of money discovering that the manager and the team are a no go zone.
What we can’t do is blame him for not knowing this because he is very new to the mad game of football. It doesn’t surprise me that he’s tried to normalise it through his business eyes, it’s just football is nowhere near a normal business. Suits, accountants, smiles and handshakes do not score goals. Neither do the best footballers in the world. Teams win games. You f**k with that team, you lose.
Berwyn, you can't defend what he's done, mate.
StT.
Wed Oct 23, 2013 11:33 pm
soulofthesea wrote:Steve the Tea TM (c) wrote:Berwyn wrote:In the interest of balance can I offer a defence of Vincent Tan in all of the goings on of late? To be fair, to do so would be a bit of a lonely voice but I always tend to look at both sides to get an even view.
In fairness VT committed the number one sin in football where, as owner, he dared to tell his manager how to win games. So is that indefensible? I have no doubt that he is not the first owner nor will he be the last to stick his nose in to what goes on over the white line. Let’s assume that this is true and he did actually do what everyone is saying.
Firstly, can I say that the biggest critics of his actions have been the national press. Well, come on, that is laughable. Yes I realise they are just filling columns but, really? The national press? How many England managers have faced the chop simply because they dared to pick a team that differed from the one the press decided on? It could be argued that the only reason that England have failed to win anything in practically living memory is because of the press deciding what the manager should do and putting him under massive pressure to fall in line. So to me, for the press to even comment on VT is beyond pot and kettle.
That in itself isn’t a defence as my title promised. What I would say is, VT’s biggest defence is he is very new to football. What he does, and what he is used to, is he gets a business. That business buys a load of stuff then sells that stuff and so on. At the end of the month VT looks at the balance sheet and says yes very good but buy more stuff and sell more. And so no. The rules are quite straight forward. They all follow business rules and an accountant makes sense of it all. This is the story of a very successful business man - Vincent Tan.
All of a sudden though he’s got himself in to a new “business” but this one doesn’t follow any of those business rules. In normal business you can, in reality, conclude that the more you invest, the more you make. Football isn’t like that though. Who was it that said “the best way to turn a rich man in to a poor man is through football”?
If anyone is looking to criticise the recruitment person at any football club, at this moment in time, then look no further than the guy at Real Madrid. His £100million on a broken Gareth Bale shadows anything any British club did. I’m not saying Bale was a bad buy, what I’m saying is football is unpredictable.
That is the game that VT will learn to either love or walk away from. He will learn that you cannot walk in to a casino, throw some cash on the crap table and then try to lecture the dice on how to land. Football is the same crap table, for an owner. You throw lots of good money on the crap table and hope something happens. Mostly though, for everyone, football is just a massive waste of money that will mostly just bring you lots of promise, anticipation, and then disappointment.
As an owner of a football club, the best you can do is throw your gamble on the table and just sit back and watch the horses come in, or not. The worst thing you can do is stick your nose in because that is the fastest and most perfect way of making sure you will lose. Even if the likes of Alex Ferguson bought a football club, guaranteed, if he stuck his nose in to the team then he will lose. On a match day the manager and his team is the football club. Everyone else is second place.
In my eyes VT has two choices. Either he accepts that the manger and the team are a no go zone or he spends a massive amount of money discovering that the manager and the team are a no go zone.
What we can’t do is blame him for not knowing this because he is very new to the mad game of football. It doesn’t surprise me that he’s tried to normalise it through his business eyes, it’s just football is nowhere near a normal business. Suits, accountants, smiles and handshakes do not score goals. Neither do the best footballers in the world. Teams win games. You f**k with that team, you lose.
Berwyn, you can't defend what he's done, mate.
StT.
his biggest defence is that he is new to football................hmmmm.......he has come into football and in a very short time has come to the conclusion that he is an expert...........arrogance im afraid isnt a defence