Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:28 am
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:33 am
underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:35 am
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:35 am
underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:44 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
To compare this to a rebrand, where someone has changed the club colours, symbol and crest, is daft.
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:50 am
underthebridge47 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
To compare this to a rebrand, where someone has changed the club colours, symbol and crest, is daft.
I'm not, and neither am I trying to wind anyone up or get a reaction.
I noticed it yesterday whilst in the pub (watching them f**k up my bet too ad it goes by winning)
Just noticed it, and couldn't recall any fuss being made over it.
Poster above has explained why now anyway.
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:52 am
JONNY012697 wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
To compare this to a rebrand, where someone has changed the club colours, symbol and crest, is daft.
I'm not, and neither am I trying to wind anyone up or get a reaction.
I noticed it yesterday whilst in the pub (watching them f**k up my bet too ad it goes by winning)
Just noticed it, and couldn't recall any fuss being made over it.
Poster above has explained why now anyway.
is the shirt still pink for breast cancer awareness or was that just for one season and the colour has stuck?
Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:57 am
underthebridge47 wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Played at HOME in PINK.
The opposition were playing in WHITE.
Blues COULD of therefore played in BLUE.
All this and no rebrand, and no fury from fans..
To compare this to a rebrand, where someone has changed the club colours, symbol and crest, is daft.
I'm not, and neither am I trying to wind anyone up or get a reaction.
I noticed it yesterday whilst in the pub (watching them f**k up my bet too ad it goes by winning)
Just noticed it, and couldn't recall any fuss being made over it.
Poster above has explained why now anyway.
is the shirt still pink for breast cancer awareness or was that just for one season and the colour has stuck?
Not sure.
Wasn't even aware of the fact they played in pink because of the Heineken cup until I read it just now
Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:12 am
Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:16 am
MOZZER1 wrote:a percentage of there gate goes to cancer awareness so i,m told hence the wearing of the pink tops
Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:43 pm