so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:27 pm
just wondered what the truth is with regard to the debt...... 
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:29 pm
krabb wrote:just wondered what the truth is with regard to the debt......
langstone,pmg
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:32 pm
Well I don't know how high this wall f*cking is but Gwyns been trying to get over it since January!!!
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:36 pm
wez1927 wrote:krabb wrote:just wondered what the truth is with regard to the debt......
langstone,pmg
out of curiosity.....how much of the alledged 140 million has been cleared...
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:38 pm
Sorry but its still a debt Wez just under Tans name and not PMG and Langstone!!! Its still a debt owed to Tan directly from the club
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:41 pm
Military Junta wrote:Sorry but its still a debt Wez just under Tans name and not PMG and Langstone!!! Its still a debt owed to Tan directly from the club
just like any other club ,ie chelsea ,man utd the difference is its owed to out owner and cant see us being in 140 m debt by the end of this season due to out 100 plus million turnover
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:45 pm
wez1927 wrote:Military Junta wrote:Sorry but its still a debt Wez just under Tans name and not PMG and Langstone!!! Its still a debt owed to Tan directly from the club
just like any other club ,ie chelsea ,man utd the difference is its owed to out owner and cant see us being in 140 m debt by the end of this season due to out 100 plus million turnover
Turnover means jack shit if the mark-up is rubbish.
How on earth can you compare Champions League teams with City FFS!!!!
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:50 pm
Military Junta wrote:wez1927 wrote:Military Junta wrote:Sorry but its still a debt Wez just under Tans name and not PMG and Langstone!!! Its still a debt owed to Tan directly from the club
just like any other club ,ie chelsea ,man utd the difference is its owed to out owner and cant see us being in 140 m debt by the end of this season due to out 100 plus million turnover
Turnover means jack shit if the mark-up is rubbish.
How on earth can you compare Champions League teams with City FFS!!!!
there debt is huge comapred to oursthats why and they have one owner not loads of shareholders , the margin will be massive this season the wage bill will be around 50 million ,we didnt pay up front for our transfers most are over 3-4 years so this shouldnt be added ,this season will be the most profitable ever
if tan coverts debt to equity it will be even more profitable
Re: so...has Tan actually cleared ant debt
Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:55 pm
He will clear all debt.
We are not an attractive club with it.
He will clear it all and sell us.
We are not an attractive club with it.
He will clear it all and sell us.