Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:40 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:03 pm
Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:04 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:08 pm
Stavross wrote:I don't think he has worked it out. It wasn't the lure of the premier league, it was the fear of not having a club to support if Tan did pull out, that forced them to 'accept' the rebrand. I think if anything, we are less dependent on his investment now, than we were when the rebrand was implemented in 2012.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:48 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:25 pm
Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:35 pm
abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:43 pm
jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:44 pm
factgasm wrote:Nevermind about Tan doing the Ayatollah, who is the woman in the red dress on the right?
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:49 pm
Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:55 pm
jackf wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
You cant be serious? Feck me you are? Wow.
Good job you didn't have any assistance from the council. You are blaming the current owners for the debt incurred by previous inept owners. Yep that makes sense. You decided to go begging around asia for a dictator we decided to ask our creditors if they would accept a reduced amount of the debt owed to them. Now which was the better decision? Only further supports my point.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:58 pm
Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
You cant be serious? Feck me you are? Wow.
Good job you didn't have any assistance from the council. You are blaming the current owners for the debt incurred by previous inept owners. Yep that makes sense. You decided to go begging around asia for a dictator we decided to ask our creditors if they would accept a reduced amount of the debt owed to them. Now which was the better decision? Only further supports my point.
Yes the council asissted us. Unfortunately only to a point and CCFC had to shell out £30-£40m on the ground. its there in the accounts for all to see.
I don't blame the current owners for the old debts - just pointing out THEY chose not to pay them. They were still Swansea City's debts no matter who owned them. It would be Ok if tomorrow I took over CCFC and decided not to pay anyone by your logic ? Great idea.
What has happened at our club is sh1t, but one thing is certain until we've shafted our creditors over for the 3rd time you lot are in no position to preach .
Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:17 pm
Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
You cant be serious? Feck me you are? Wow.
Good job you didn't have any assistance from the council. You are blaming the current owners for the debt incurred by previous inept owners. Yep that makes sense. You decided to go begging around asia for a dictator we decided to ask our creditors if they would accept a reduced amount of the debt owed to them. Now which was the better decision? Only further supports my point.
Yes the council asissted us. Unfortunately only to a point and CCFC had to shell out £30-£40m on the ground. its there in the accounts for all to see.
I don't blame the current owners for the old debts - just pointing out THEY chose not to pay them. They were still Swansea City's debts no matter who owned them. It would be Ok if tomorrow I took over CCFC and decided not to pay anyone by your logic ? Great idea.
What has happened at our club is sh1t, but one thing is certain until we've shafted our creditors over for the 3rd time you lot are in no position to preach .
Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:19 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:19 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:01 pm
NJ73 wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
You cant be serious? Feck me you are? Wow.
Good job you didn't have any assistance from the council. You are blaming the current owners for the debt incurred by previous inept owners. Yep that makes sense. You decided to go begging around asia for a dictator we decided to ask our creditors if they would accept a reduced amount of the debt owed to them. Now which was the better decision? Only further supports my point.
Yes the council asissted us. Unfortunately only to a point and CCFC had to shell out £30-£40m on the ground. its there in the accounts for all to see.
I don't blame the current owners for the old debts - just pointing out THEY chose not to pay them. They were still Swansea City's debts no matter who owned them. It would be Ok if tomorrow I took over CCFC and decided not to pay anyone by your logic ? Great idea.
What has happened at our club is sh1t, but one thing is certain until we've shafted our creditors over for the 3rd time you lot are in no position to preach .
So how much did you pay Hammam compared to the amount he was owed?
Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:03 am
Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:31 am
NJ73 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:Lawnmower wrote:jackf wrote:abergblue wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/owners-like-cardiffs-vincent-tan-ought-to-make-fans-careful-what-they-wish-for-8875146.html
I just read this and the guy seems to have it worked out. One thing for sure the whole world has heard of the "Bluebirds" now!!!
The Swansea model???? Poor reporting if he doesn't know about their bankruptcy history.
Far from it. What has our model got to do with bankruptcy which was caused by previous models. Feck me your all so obsessed with our past.
You do realise the people who put you into the CVA the last time are your current board and major shareholders ?
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... ns-1836528
They made the decision. Had you continued with those debts, which at the time were similar to ours God knows where you would be now.
Also having a free brand new 20000 seater and nothing to pay until you get to the Prem is a bit of an advantage. try having to put £30-£40m into it and see what that would have done to your debt.
Yeah - more fool the CCFc directors for paying it. Some would just say'good business' by your lot. If so fair enough, but not really a fair basis for comparison.
There are far better models, clubs like West Brom and Norwich who paid their debts off.
You cant be serious? Feck me you are? Wow.
Good job you didn't have any assistance from the council. You are blaming the current owners for the debt incurred by previous inept owners. Yep that makes sense. You decided to go begging around asia for a dictator we decided to ask our creditors if they would accept a reduced amount of the debt owed to them. Now which was the better decision? Only further supports my point.
Yes the council asissted us. Unfortunately only to a point and CCFC had to shell out £30-£40m on the ground. its there in the accounts for all to see.
I don't blame the current owners for the old debts - just pointing out THEY chose not to pay them. They were still Swansea City's debts no matter who owned them. It would be Ok if tomorrow I took over CCFC and decided not to pay anyone by your logic ? Great idea.
What has happened at our club is sh1t, but one thing is certain until we've shafted our creditors over for the 3rd time you lot are in no position to preach .
So how much did you pay Hammam compared to the amount he was owed?
Silence
Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:36 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:I'd take the Jacks situation no doubt about it. I'd take League 2, fan ownership and our own ways of being. We might have trips to places unknown worldwide and we might have to brave the rubbish weather for midweek games more often but it was much better.
That's when football was truly football. I miss the good old days sat behind a pillar. Back then as well the true traditionalist fans were nicer. Now the plastics only care about money and not their fellow fan. Even the stewards now think they are power rangers.
What's become of us aye? We could have worked our way properly to the top in blue parading the bluebird in Europe proudly and singing our songs with our diehard fans and a proper anthem we brought through like Roma and Liverpool and so on. We had that passionate club once and could have become recognised the proper way a football club should be.
Now we are a circus act. We are the Miley Cyrus of football and Tan is the wrecking ball.