Has our tactics/football been good enough??

Just a question.

We all accepted our football wasnt the best last year and after seeing the same after spending 35 million maybe VT has seen enough??

HOWEVER if that is the case there is a correct way about going about things.

Malky has got it right 90% of the time this season for me

We are underdogs every week and need every point and goal we can get.

Playing defensively against the bigger teams is what needs to be done (Man City game for example) Then we can go on the attack against the smaller sides (Fulham)

I dont want Malky gone, and I think he's been right most of the time so far, long may it continue

Malky has got it right 90% of the time this season for me

We are underdogs every week and need every point and goal we can get.

Playing defensively against the bigger teams is what needs to be done (Man City game for example) Then we can go on the attack against the smaller sides (Fulham)

I dont want Malky gone, and I think he's been right most of the time so far, long may it continue

good post

Agreed Paul. With a budget of 35m to still see us playing hoofball is so deflating that im not bothered if Malky goes to be honest.

Obviously concerned about the way VT appears to be going about it but then we dont know the full story yet.

Hoof ball was only a problem for me against West Ham (which i can forgive very easily as it was our first game) and Newcastle, i thought we played some great stuff against Fulham and all our other games have been against top sides.