Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:27 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:32 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:35 pm
CityGent wrote:I didn't confirm it. I just said that was one of the nasty rumours going round, and i wouldn't believe the charges anyway
Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:37 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:12 pm
BACONSANDWICH-WITH -BROWNSAUCE wrote:Story from the other board and confirmed by city gent regarding transfer dealings.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:19 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:28 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:11 pm
xajax wrote:Cobblers. If he'd done wrong, he'd have been sacked. The fact he's been put on "gardening leave", means the club knows there are no grounds for dismissal, else they would have done so. Then it would have been Tan in need of a lawyer.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:41 pm
Natman Blue wrote:xajax wrote:Cobblers. If he'd done wrong, he'd have been sacked. The fact he's been put on "gardening leave", means the club knows there are no grounds for dismissal, else they would have done so. Then it would have been Tan in need of a lawyer.
Gardening leave can mean they suspect something but need to investigate fully before action is taken.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:49 pm
Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:51 pm
Owain wrote:BACONSANDWICH-WITH -BROWNSAUCE wrote:Story from the other board and confirmed by city gent regarding transfer dealings.
What's wrong with using one of your other usernames?
Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:21 pm
xajax wrote:Natman Blue wrote:xajax wrote:Cobblers. If he'd done wrong, he'd have been sacked. The fact he's been put on "gardening leave", means the club knows there are no grounds for dismissal, else they would have done so. Then it would have been Tan in need of a lawyer.
Gardening leave can mean they suspect something but need to investigate fully before action is taken.
Then he would have been suspended pending an investigation. What they have done is to remove him for the rest of the season, which suggests he's not done anything they can sack him for. He's just rubbed the boss up the wrong way.
It seems there are some who don't want you to know what is going on at your club.