Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:43 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:45 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:48 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Don't see anyone doing that on here.![]()
People aren't happy with him for parachuting his sons's mate, who was decorating the stadium in the summer, into the head of recruitment role.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:49 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:50 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Well, I've not seen one fan say Tan is a bad chairman for the reasons you give, but I've seen many say what I've pointed out.
So I can't see where all this "double standards" you claim, is coming from.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:52 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:55 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:05 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:05 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:06 am
Old school BLUE wrote:Chuckles I agree with you about replacing Moody with Tans sons mate but FFS stop repeating yourself your boring the pants off everyone !!!
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:09 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Yeah, I mean, theres been absolutely no support for Iain Moody on here, no calling Tan a C*nt for the bonus row
The only gripes are about the 23 year old kid
Barry Blinkers
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:09 am
Old school BLUE wrote:Chuckles I agree with you about replacing Moody with Tans sons mate but FFS stop repeating yourself your boring the pants off everyone !!!
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:11 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Yeah, I mean, theres been absolutely no support for Iain Moody on here, no calling Tan a C*nt for the bonus row
The only gripes are about the 23 year old kid
Barry Blinkers
The calls for Tan Out certainly aren't because he didn't pay sufficient bonuses.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:14 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:15 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:22 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:No, but then I've not seen VT labelled a **** for not paying the bonuses either... Then again, I've not checked every single post... There may be one or two, but certainly not a huge amount, which your OP suggests.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:24 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:28 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:31 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:33 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Chuckles, I have the flu and I come on here to read some news as I cant sleep. I don't appreciate reading your boring tripe this morning. Please give it a rest for a day FFS.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:34 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:48 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Chuckles, I have the flu and I come on here to read some news as I cant sleep. I don't appreciate reading your boring tripe this morning. Please give it a rest for a day FFS.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:51 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No, but then I've not seen VT labelled a **** for not paying the bonuses either... Then again, I've not checked every single post... There may be one or two, but certainly not a huge amount, which your OP suggests.
One or two
OK
Before the Iain Moody news broke, which seems to be as a result of the bonus fall out, there were people falling over themselves to blame Tan for disrupting the team over the bonus issue.
You probably didnt notice as you are too busy posting your own opinion a million times on different threads.
Mario Polotelli wrote:Yes I agree but people are getting the noose ready before the facts are known.
Its like a kangaroo court on this thread.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:08 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Jimbo he can help you sleep mate. Hes got a new motto:
"Barry the bore, makes you snore"
Barry Chuckle wrote:Already firmly back in the Tan In camp then?
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:11 am
JBCCFC1927 wrote:
No. I want Tan out of the club for good. I'd take the risk of forcing him out to be honest. I don't believe for a second we'll be debt free even when the debt to equity conversion happens because other financial agreements I believe will be made and possibly even gambles to try and make it. If you look at the top clubs in the Premier League, all of them are servicing debt with interest and if thats where Tan wants Cardiff to be then why are we going to be any different?
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:13 am
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:16 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Talk about scraping the barrel
Saying that it "seems" the reason why Moody has gone with what has unravelled this last 24 hours, is not quite the same as the Tan Out hysteria yesterday morning. Even such a staunch Tan hater as yourself can see that BB.
So because you didnt see any that means you disagree with the thread and imply its wrong.
And you call Tan a dictator.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:19 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Talk about scraping the barrel
Saying that it "seems" the reason why Moody has gone with what has unravelled this last 24 hours, is not quite the same as the Tan Out hysteria yesterday morning. Even such a staunch Tan hater as yourself can see that BB.
So because you didnt see any that means you disagree with the thread and imply its wrong.
And you call Tan a dictator.
Not scraping the barrel at all. You made an assumption about Moody's dismissal, despite having a go at others for doing exactly the same in the last 2 days.
Well, I've not seen one person say it, so I'd say it was wrong. Especially as you spoke about "Cardiff City fans" as a collaborative. Had you said "one or two fans" maybe it would have been more accurate.
Yes I do, what else would you call someone who threatens to walk and potentially destroy the club just because the fans won't go on along with his favourite colour?
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:22 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:So youve not seen one person imply Tan was in the wrong over the bonus?
No. I've already said this.
And because of that this thread is "Wrong".
Now where have I said that the thread was "wrong"? Stop making things up. I simply disagreed with it.
You know how to use the search button Barry now you can either do this and then pipe down or I will put up several links if you like?
Barry Chuckle wrote:No, but then I've not seen VT labelled a **** for not paying the bonuses either... Then again, I've not checked every single post... There may be one or two, but certainly not a huge amount, which your OP suggests.
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:36 am
Don't see anyone doing that on here.
Well, I've not seen one fan say Tan is a bad chairman for the reasons you give
There may be one or two
Now where have I said that the thread was "wrong"? Stop making things up. I simply disagreed with it
Well, I've not seen one person say it, so I'd say it was wrong.