Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:27 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:29 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:33 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:39 pm
john52 wrote:Did not see match but people seem to be saying Malky got tactics wrong Was this tue and was he too negative considering we were the home side?
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:14 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:16 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:I blame the players. We set up same way 2nd half but played with more urgency. Mutch was fantastic
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:28 pm
john52 wrote:Did not see match but people seem to be saying Malky got tactics wrong Was this tue and was he too negative considering we were the home side?
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:35 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:I blame the players. We set up same way 2nd half but played with more urgency. Mutch was fantastic
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:40 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:I blame the players. We set up same way 2nd half but played with more urgency. Mutch was fantastic
Delusional.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:57 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:I blame the players. We set up same way 2nd half but played with more urgency. Mutch was fantastic
Delusional.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Really?
So what change was made in the 2nd half to the system we played 1st half?
Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:58 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:I blame the players. We set up same way 2nd half but played with more urgency. Mutch was fantastic
Delusional.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Really?
So what change was made in the 2nd half to the system we played 1st half?
Mutch was put on and he is more physical player which meant he could dominate in the midfield which alleviated pressure on others and allowed more possession in the middle to dictate the game. Still wasn't enough though as Gunnarsson should not have started as Medel doesn't need a babysitter and he should have started Mutch instead of Gunnarsson. Not hard to work out Craig.
Are you sure you are watching the correct sport?![]()
![]()
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:07 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:So it was players then and not the system....thx for agreeing
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:09 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:10 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:So it was players then and not the system....thx for agreeing
The players are part of the system and tactics overall and yes it did change as you will be shown on goals on Sunday tomorrow morning when they do the in depth analysis. Odemwingie stayed more to his right wing and didnt have to cover for Kim and that was Malky's tactics fault for putting Kim in their to be dominated by Tiote, Cabaye and Sissoko.
But of course your love in for Malky wont let you see it.
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:12 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Love in for Malky?
You must be right considering you're a serie A scout
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:15 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Love in for Malky?
You must be right considering you're a serie A scout
So you cant carry your argument so instead resort to things from the past? Okay, Jon Parkin.
Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:16 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:27 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:54 pm
Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:00 pm
Neath Bluebird wrote:Malkey and tactics? Turner oof ball and give it back to our opposition, that's malkey's tactics. Very very poor.
Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:02 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:
You do make me laugh. I bet you're a shithouse away from this forum
Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:09 pm
Syntax Design wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:
You do make me laugh. I bet you're a shithouse away from this forum
You can always try and find out if you want.
Onto the real point though, funny how today you are blaming Malky's poor system and tactics and dire brand of football and you are no longer blaming the players.
Sat Nov 09, 2013 6:17 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Barnett, dont try and get all tough.
Yes, i do blame Maljy now as at the time i believed that. Now as more and more games go by against weaker teams and we still play the same then questions need to be asked.